Literature DB >> 25008082

Three-dimensional flow and lift characteristics of a hovering ruby-throated hummingbird.

Jialei Song1, Haoxiang Luo2, Tyson L Hedrick3.   

Abstract

A three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics simulation is performed for a ruby-throated hummingbird (Archilochus colubris) in hovering flight. Realistic wing kinematics are adopted in the numerical model by reconstructing the wing motion from high-speed imaging data of the bird. Lift history and the three-dimensional flow pattern around the wing in full stroke cycles are captured in the simulation. Significant asymmetry is observed for lift production within a stroke cycle. In particular, the downstroke generates about 2.5 times as much vertical force as the upstroke, a result that confirms the estimate based on the measurement of the circulation in a previous experimental study. Associated with lift production is the similar power imbalance between the two half strokes. Further analysis shows that in addition to the angle of attack, wing velocity and surface area, drag-based force and wing-wake interaction also contribute significantly to the lift asymmetry. Though the wing-wake interaction could be beneficial for lift enhancement, the isolated stroke simulation shows that this benefit is buried by other opposing effects, e.g. presence of downwash. The leading-edge vortex is stable during the downstroke but may shed during the upstroke. Finally, the full-body simulation result shows that the effects of wing-wing interaction and wing-body interaction are small.
© 2014 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aerodynamics; animal flight; computational fluid dynamics; hummingbird

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25008082      PMCID: PMC4233705          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2014.0541

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  17 in total

Review 1.  The aerodynamics of insect flight.

Authors:  Sanjay P Sane
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Resolution of a paradox: hummingbird flight at high elevation does not come without a cost.

Authors:  Douglas L Altshuler; Robert Dudley; Jimmy A McGuire
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-12-14       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Structure of the vortex wake in hovering Anna's hummingbirds (Calypte anna).

Authors:  M Wolf; V M Ortega-Jimenez; R Dudley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Lift production in the hovering hummingbird.

Authors:  Douglas R Warrick; Bret W Tobalske; Donald R Powers
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Details of insect wing design and deformation enhance aerodynamic function and flight efficiency.

Authors:  John Young; Simon M Walker; Richard J Bomphrey; Graham K Taylor; Adrian L R Thomas
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Analysis of the transitional flow field over a fixed hummingbird wing.

Authors:  Yossef Elimelech; Charles P Ellington
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  The aerodynamics of free-flight maneuvers in Drosophila.

Authors:  Steven N Fry; Rosalyn Sayaman; Michael H Dickinson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-04-18       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Morphological and kinematic basis of the hummingbird flight stroke: scaling of flight muscle transmission ratio.

Authors:  Tyson L Hedrick; Bret W Tobalske; Ivo G Ros; Douglas R Warrick; Andrew A Biewener
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Three-dimensional kinematics of hummingbird flight.

Authors:  Bret W Tobalske; Douglas R Warrick; Christopher J Clark; Donald R Powers; Tyson L Hedrick; Gabriel A Hyder; Andrew A Biewener
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Unsteady aerodynamic force generation by a model fruit fly wing in flapping motion.

Authors:  Mao Sun; Jian Tang
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  17 in total

1.  Lift enhancement by bats' dynamically changing wingspan.

Authors:  Shizhao Wang; Xing Zhang; Guowei He; Tianshu Liu
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-12-06       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Power reduction and the radial limit of stall delay in revolving wings of different aspect ratio.

Authors:  Jan W Kruyt; GertJan F van Heijst; Douglas L Altshuler; David Lentink
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Flying in reverse: kinematics and aerodynamics of a dragonfly in backward free flight.

Authors:  Ayodeji T Bode-Oke; Samane Zeyghami; Haibo Dong
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 4.  Evolution of avian flight: muscles and constraints on performance.

Authors:  Bret W Tobalske
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Flight feather attachment in rock pigeons (Columba livia): covert feathers and smooth muscle coordinate a morphing wing.

Authors:  Tobin L Hieronymus
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 2.610

6.  Limitations of rotational manoeuvrability in insects and hummingbirds: evaluating the effects of neuro-biomechanical delays and muscle mechanical power.

Authors:  Pan Liu; Bo Cheng
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  Flow pattern similarities in the near wake of three bird species suggest a common role for unsteady aerodynamic effects in lift generation.

Authors:  Roi Gurka; Krishnamoorthy Krishnan; Hadar Ben-Gida; Adam J Kirchhefer; Gregory A Kopp; Christopher G Guglielmo
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 3.906

8.  State-space aerodynamic model reveals high force control authority and predictability in flapping flight.

Authors:  Yagiz E Bayiz; Bo Cheng
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 4.293

9.  Field Flight Dynamics of Hummingbirds during Territory Encroachment and Defense.

Authors:  Katherine M Sholtis; Ryan M Shelton; Tyson L Hedrick
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Three-dimensional simulation for fast forward flight of a calliope hummingbird.

Authors:  Jialei Song; Bret W Tobalske; Donald R Powers; Tyson L Hedrick; Haoxiang Luo
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 2.963

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.