Literature DB >> 25031038

Sugar flux through the flight muscles of hovering vertebrate nectarivores: a review.

Kenneth C Welch1, Chris C W Chen.   

Abstract

In most vertebrates, uptake and oxidation of circulating sugars by locomotor muscles rises with increasing exercise intensity. However, uptake rate by muscle plateaus at moderate aerobic exercise intensities and intracellular fuels dominate at oxygen consumption rates of 50% of maximum or more. Further, uptake and oxidation of circulating fructose by muscle is negligible. In contrast, hummingbirds and nectar bats are capable of fueling expensive hovering flight exclusively, or nearly completely, with dietary sugar. In addition, hummingbirds and nectar bats appear capable of fueling hovering flight completely with fructose. Three crucial steps are believed to be rate limiting to muscle uptake of circulating glucose or fructose in vertebrates: (1) delivery to muscle; (2) transport into muscle through glucose transporter proteins (GLUTs); and (3) phosphorylation of glucose by hexokinase (HK) within the muscle. In this review, we summarize what is known about the functional upregulation of exogenous sugar flux at each of these steps in hummingbirds and nectar bats. High cardiac output, capillary density, and blood sugar levels in hummingbirds and bats enhance sugar delivery to muscles (step 1). Hummingbird and nectar bat flight muscle fibers have relatively small cross-sectional areas and thus relatively high surface areas across which transport can occur (step 2). Maximum HK activities in each species are enough for carbohydrate flux through glycolysis to satisfy 100 % of hovering oxidative demand (step 3). However, qualitative patterns of GLUT expression in the muscle (step 2) raise more questions than they answer regarding sugar transport in hummingbirds and suggest major differences in the regulation of sugar flux compared to nectar bats. Behavioral and physiological similarities among hummingbirds, nectar bats, and other vertebrates suggest enhanced capacities for exogenous fuel use during exercise may be more wide spread than previously appreciated. Further, how the capacity for uptake and phosphorylation of circulating fructose is enhanced remains a tantalizing unknown.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25031038     DOI: 10.1007/s00360-014-0843-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol B        ISSN: 0174-1578            Impact factor:   2.200


  79 in total

1.  Regulation of glucose uptake in muscle. III. The interaction of membrane transport and phosphorylation in the control of glucose uptake.

Authors:  R L POST; H E MORGAN; C R PARK
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1961-02       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 2.  Circulatory variables and the flight performance of birds.

Authors:  Charles M Bishop
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Comparison of exogenous glucose, fructose and galactose oxidation during exercise using 13C-labelling.

Authors:  Yan Burelle; Marie-Catherine Lamoureux; François Péronnet; Denis Massicotte; Carole Lavoie
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.718

4.  Dissociation of effects of insulin and contraction on glucose transport in rat epitrochlearis muscle.

Authors:  R Nesher; I E Karl; D M Kipnis
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1985-09

Review 5.  Balance of carbohydrate and lipid utilization during exercise: the "crossover" concept.

Authors:  G A Brooks; J Mercier
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1994-06

6.  Intestinal disaccharidases in five species of phyllostomoid bats.

Authors:  A Hernandez; C Martinez del Rio
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol B       Date:  1992-09

7.  Sugar and protein digestion in flowerpiercers and hummingbirds: a comparative test of adaptive convergence.

Authors:  J E Schondube; C Martinez del Rio
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2004-02-03       Impact factor: 2.200

Review 8.  Exercise, GLUT4, and skeletal muscle glucose uptake.

Authors:  Erik A Richter; Mark Hargreaves
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 37.312

9.  Pathways through the intercellular clefts of frog mesenteric capillaries.

Authors:  R H Adamson; C C Michel
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Fiber type homogeneity of the flight musculature in small birds.

Authors:  Kenneth C Welch; Douglas L Altshuler
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 2.231

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  (13)C-Breath testing in animals: theory, applications, and future directions.

Authors:  Marshall D McCue; Kenneth C Welch
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 2.200

2.  GLUT5 (SLC2A5) enables fructose-mediated proliferation independent of ketohexokinase.

Authors:  Roger J Liang; Samuel Taylor; Navid Nahiyaan; Junho Song; Charles J Murphy; Ezequiel Dantas; Shuyuan Cheng; Ting-Wei Hsu; Shakti Ramsamooj; Rahul Grover; Seo-Kyoung Hwang; Bryan Ngo; Lewis C Cantley; Kyu Y Rhee; Marcus D Goncalves
Journal:  Cancer Metab       Date:  2021-03-24

Review 3.  Sugar Metabolism in Hummingbirds and Nectar Bats.

Authors:  Raul K Suarez; Kenneth C Welch
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 5.717

4.  Diet-MEF2 interactions shape lipid droplet diversification in muscle to influence Drosophila lifespan.

Authors:  Xiao Zhao; Xiaotong Li; Xiangyu Shi; Jason Karpac
Journal:  Aging Cell       Date:  2020-06-14       Impact factor: 9.304

5.  Synergism, Bifunctionality, and the Evolution of a Gradual Sensory Trade-off in Hummingbird Taste Receptors.

Authors:  Glenn Cockburn; Meng-Ching Ko; Keren R Sadanandan; Eliot T Miller; Tomoya Nakagita; Amanda Monte; Sungbo Cho; Eugeni Roura; Yasuka Toda; Maude W Baldwin
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 16.240

6.  Single-molecule, full-length transcript sequencing provides insight into the extreme metabolism of the ruby-throated hummingbird Archilochus colubris.

Authors:  Rachael E Workman; Alexander M Myrka; G William Wong; Elizabeth Tseng; Kenneth C Welch; Winston Timp
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 6.524

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.