Literature DB >> 27431590

Wingbeat kinematics and energetics during weightlifting in hovering hummingbirds across an elevational gradient.

Derrick J E Groom1,2, M Cecilia B Toledo3, Kenneth C Welch4,5.   

Abstract

Hummingbirds differentially modify flight kinematics in response to the type of challenge imposed. Weightlifting is associated with increases in stroke amplitude (the angle swept by the wings) to increase the angular velocity of the wings and generate the requisite lift, but only up to 160°. Conversely, flight in hypodense air is accomplished by increasing the angular velocity of the wing through increases in wingbeat frequency and stroke amplitudes, with larger increases in amplitude than seen in weightlifting flight. The kinematic differences between these two challenges may be facilitated by the lower energetic costs associated with overcoming drag and inertial forces over the wing during hypodense flight. Thus, we hypothesized that energetic expenditure is what limits the kinematics of weightlifting flight, with lower air densities permitting increases in angular velocity at comparatively lower costs. To explore the kinematic and energetic effects of air density and weightlifting on hovering flight performance, video and respirometric recordings of weightlifting were performed on four species of hummingbirds across an elevational gradient. Contrary to our hypothesis, wingbeat frequency did not vary due to elevation. Instead, wingbeat frequency seems to increase depending on the power requirements for sustaining hovering flight. Furthermore, metabolic rates during hovering increased with angular velocity alone, independent of elevation. Thus, it appears that the differential responses to flight challenges are not driven by variation in the flight media.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Elevation; Hovering; Hummingbirds; Kinematics; Load-lifting; Metabolism

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27431590     DOI: 10.1007/s00360-016-1016-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol B        ISSN: 0174-1578            Impact factor:   2.200


  25 in total

1.  Maximal horizontal flight performance of hummingbirds: effects of body mass and molt.

Authors:  P Chai; D L Altshuler; D B Stephens; M E Dillon
Journal:  Physiol Biochem Zool       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.247

2.  The power of feeder-mask respirometry as a method for examining hummingbird energetics.

Authors:  Kenneth C Welch
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 2.320

3.  Resolution of a paradox: hummingbird flight at high elevation does not come without a cost.

Authors:  Douglas L Altshuler; Robert Dudley; Jimmy A McGuire
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-12-14       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Limits to vertical force and power production in bumblebees (Hymenoptera: Bombus impatiens).

Authors:  R Buchwald; R Dudley
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  Short-amplitude high-frequency wing strokes determine the aerodynamics of honeybee flight.

Authors:  Douglas L Altshuler; William B Dickson; Jason T Vance; Stephen P Roberts; Michael H Dickinson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-12-05       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Hovering flight in the honeybee Apis mellifera: kinematic mechanisms for varying aerodynamic forces.

Authors:  Jason T Vance; Douglas L Altshuler; William B Dickson; Michael H Dickinson; Stephen P Roberts
Journal:  Physiol Biochem Zool       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 2.247

7.  The effects of age and behavioral development on honey bee (Apis mellifera) flight performance.

Authors:  Jason T Vance; Jason B Williams; Michelle M Elekonich; Stephen P Roberts
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Neuromuscular control of hovering wingbeat kinematics in response to distinct flight challenges in the ruby-throated hummingbird, Archilochus colubris.

Authors:  Sajeni Mahalingam; Kenneth C Welch
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Kinematics of hovering hummingbird flight along simulated and natural elevational gradients.

Authors:  Douglas L Altshuler; Robert Dudley
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  The changes in power requirements and muscle efficiency during elevated force production in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  F O Lehmann; M H Dickinson
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  2 in total

1.  Integrating morphology and kinematics in the scaling of hummingbird hovering metabolic rate and efficiency.

Authors:  Derrick J E Groom; M Cecilia B Toledo; Donald R Powers; Bret W Tobalske; Kenneth C Welch
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  The biomechanical origin of extreme wing allometry in hummingbirds.

Authors:  Dimitri A Skandalis; Paolo S Segre; Joseph W Bahlman; Derrick J E Groom; Kenneth C Welch; Christopher C Witt; Jimmy A McGuire; Robert Dudley; David Lentink; Douglas L Altshuler
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 14.919

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.