Literature DB >> 8895626

In vivo knee kinematics derived using an inverse perspective technique.

D A Dennis1, R D Komistek, W A Hoff, S M Gabriel.   

Abstract

Sixty-four subjects having implanted and nonimplanted knees were studied using fluoroscopic videos. Each subject, flexing in the sagittal plane, performed successive deep knee bends under fluoroscopic surveillance. Femorotibial contact in the sagittal plane was then determined using image matching and discrete digitization. At full extension, the mean contact point of the normal and posterior stabilized implanted femurs was anterior to the tibial midpoint in the sagittal plane. The average position was 6.49 mm (+3 - +13 mm) for the normal knees and 0.30 mm (0 - +4 mm) for the posterior stabilized knees. The implanted posterior cruciate retaining and anterior cruciate ligament deficient knees differed from the other knee types. Their average initial contact was posterior. The average contact at full extension for the posterior cruciate retaining and anterior cruciate ligament deficient knees was -5.13 mm (-2 - -8 mm) and -5.45 mm (-2 - -14 mm), respectively. The femur of the normal knee contacts the tibia anterior to the midpoint in the sagittal plane in full extension and translates posteriorly during flexion. The femur of the posterior stabilized knee contacts the tibia anteriorly, slightly less than the normal knee, and rolls back posteriorly during flexion similar to normal knees. The femurs of the posterior cruciate retaining and anterior cruciate ligament deficient knees contact the tibia posterior in extension, but translate anteriorly during midflexion in a substantial number of cases, which is kinematically opposite of the normal knees. The abnormal anterior femoral translation observed in the posterior cruciate retaining knees may be a factor in the premature polyethylene wear seen in retrieval studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8895626     DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199610000-00015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  38 in total

1.  Kinematic analysis of mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing knee prostheses by simulation.

Authors:  K Higashijima; A Ishida; Y Fukuoka; A Hoshino; H Minamitani
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 2.  Dynamic knee laxity measurement devices.

Authors:  Mattias Ahldén; Yuichi Hoshino; Kristian Samuelsson; Paulo Araujo; Volker Musahl; Jón Karlsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-12-31       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Prosthetic component segmentation with blur compensation: a fast method for 3D fluoroscopy.

Authors:  Giacomo Tarroni; Luca Tersi; Cristiana Corsi; Rita Stagni
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  The hysteresis effect in carpal kinematics.

Authors:  Sunjay Berdia; Walter H Short; Frederick W Werner; Jason K Green; Manohar Panjabi
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.230

5.  [In vivo biomechanics of unicondylar knee replacement performed using minimally invasive technique].

Authors:  J-N A Argenson; R D Komistek; S Akizuki
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  [TKA kinematics. In vivo techniques and results].

Authors:  R von Eisenhart-Rothe; T Vogl; K-H Englmeier; D A Dennis
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  Intraoperative evaluation of total knee replacement: kinematic assessment with a navigation system.

Authors:  Daniela Casino; Stefano Zaffagnini; Sandra Martelli; Nicola Lopomo; Simone Bignozzi; Francesco Iacono; Alessandro Russo; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-12-20       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Posterior stabilized TKA reduce patellofemoral contact pressure compared with cruciate retaining TKA in vitro.

Authors:  Christoph Becher; Thomas J Heyse; Nadine Kron; Sven Ostermeier; Christof Hurschler; Markus D Schofer; Susanne Fuchs-Winkelmann; Carsten O Tibesku
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-03-21       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Factors affecting intraoperative kinematic patterns and flexion angles in navigated total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kazunari Ishida; Nao Shibanuma; Tomoyuki Matsumoto; Hiroshi Sasaki; Koji Takayama; Akihiko Toda; Ryosuke Kuroda; Masahiro Kurosaka
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Survivorship at minimum 10-year follow-up of a rotating-platform, mobile-bearing, posterior-stabilised total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Michele Ulivi; Luca Orlandini; Valentina Meroni; Olmo Consonni; Valerio Sansone
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.