Literature DB >> 8887892

The influence of otoliths and somatic graviceptors on angular velocity estimation.

M L Mittelstaedt1, H Mittelstaedt.   

Abstract

In three psychophysical experiments subjects (Ss), blindfolded and earphoned with white noise, estimated their angular speed A) after brief acceleration to constant centric or eccentric rotation, and B) after deceleration to a full stop. Ss either indicated whenever they were rotated through 180 degrees, or manipulated the objective velocity such that the subjective one stayed constant. With Ss in an earth-vertical attitude, subjective speed declined exponentially with a time constant that depended on eccentricity in paradigm A, but not in B. The time constant depended linearly on the amount of the centrifugal force, but not on its direction. Thus, centrifugal force has an enhancing effect on perceived angular speed. The relevant sense organs were identified with Ss in a radial, earth-horizontal attitude. The enhancing effect was minimal when the axis of rotation was caudal of the otoliths, indicating an effect of graviceptors in the trunk. This effect, just as the effect of recently discovered truncal graviceptors on the perception of posture, turned out to depend on leg position: The minimum of the enhancing effect shifted from about 30 cm to about 60 cm caudal of the otoliths, when leg position changed from flexed to extended. It is concluded that the centrifugal force, measured by otoliths and truncal graviceptors, serves to provide information on angular velocity at eccentric rotation, at least as long as the output of the velocity storage is not yet zero.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8887892

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vestib Res        ISSN: 0957-4271            Impact factor:   2.435


  16 in total

1.  Maintaining spatial body alignment on a rotating platform by means of active counter-circling: role of vestibular and podokinesthetic afferents.

Authors:  Volker Diekmann; Reinhart Jürgens; Wolfgang Becker
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-08-06       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Inertial cues do not enhance knowledge of environmental layout.

Authors:  David Waller; Jack M Loomis; Sibylle D Steck
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-12

3.  Canal-otolith interactions and detection thresholds of linear and angular components during curved-path self-motion.

Authors:  Paul R MacNeilage; Amanda H Turner; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Optokinetic circular vection: a test of visual-vestibular conflict models of vection nascensy.

Authors:  R Jürgens; K Kliegl; J Kassubek; W Becker
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Perceived tilt and translation during variable-radius swing motion with congruent or conflicting visual and vestibular cues.

Authors:  Andrew A Rader; Charles M Oman; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-03-19       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Reproduction of ON-center and OFF-center self-rotations.

Authors:  I Israël; M Crockett; L Zupan; D Merfeld
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-06-04       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The role of body-based sensory information in the acquisition of enduring spatial representations.

Authors:  David Waller; Nathan Greenauer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-09-05

8.  Whole-motion model of perception during forward- and backward-facing centrifuge runs.

Authors:  Jan E Holly; Arturs Vrublevskis; Lindsay E Carlson
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.435

9.  The contribution of otoliths and semicircular canals to the perception of two-dimensional passive whole-body motion in humans.

Authors:  Y P Ivanenko; R Grasso; I Israël; A Berthoz
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1997-07-01       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Direction of balance and perception of the upright are perceptually dissociable.

Authors:  Heather Panic; Alexander Sacha Panic; Paul DiZio; James R Lackner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.