Literature DB >> 9234209

The contribution of otoliths and semicircular canals to the perception of two-dimensional passive whole-body motion in humans.

Y P Ivanenko1, R Grasso, I Israël, A Berthoz.   

Abstract

1. Perception of two-dimensional (2-D) whole-body passive motion in the horizontal plane was studied in twelve blindfolded healthy volunteers: pure rotation in place (180 deg), linear motion (4.5 m) and a semicircular trajectory (radius, 1.5 m; angular acceleration, 0.2 rad s-2) were applied in random sequence by means of a remote-controlled robot equipped with a racing-car seat. The seat orientation in the horizontal plane was controlled by the experimenter, independent of the robot trajectory. Thus different degrees of otolith-canal interaction were obtained. The maximal linear acceleration during the semicircular trajectory was 0.1 g; however, the linear acceleration vector was complex as it rotated relative to the subject's head. 2. In the first of two sessions, subjects were instructed to maintain an angular pointer oriented towards a remote (15 m) previously seen target during the passive movements. In the second session they had to make a drawing of the path of the perceived trajectory, after the movement was finished. 3. The results showed that, on average, the movement of the pointer matched the dynamics of the rotatory component of the 2-D motion well. This suggests that, in the range of linear accelerations used in this study, no appreciable influence of otolith input on canal-mediated perception of angular motion occurred. 4. The curvature of the drawn paths was mostly explained by the input to the semicircular canals. Subjects' reconstruction of motion did not account for the directional dynamics of the input to the otoliths occurring during passive motion. 5. This finding proves that reconstructing trajectory in space does not imply a mathematically perfect transformation of the linear and angular motion-related inputs into a Cartesian or polar 2-D representation. Physiological constraints on the interaction between motion direction and change of heading play an important role in motion perception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9234209      PMCID: PMC1159584          DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1997.223bl.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  26 in total

1.  The dynamics of spatial orientation during complex and changing linear and angular acceleration.

Authors:  F E Guedry; A H Rupert; B J McGrath; C M Oman
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.435

2.  How to explain a constant subjective vertical at constant high speed rotation about an earth-horizontal axis.

Authors:  H Mittelstaedt; S Glasauer; G Gralla; M L Mittelstaedt
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol Suppl       Date:  1989

3.  Self-controlled reorienting movements in response to rotational displacements in normal subjects and patients with labyrinthine disease.

Authors:  T Metcalfe; M Gresty
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1992-05-22       Impact factor: 5.691

4.  Adaptive modification of vestibularly perceived rotation.

Authors:  J Bloomberg; G Melvill Jones; B Segal
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The role of the vestibular organs in space orientation.

Authors:  P WORCHEL
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1952-07

6.  Goal-directed linear locomotion in normal and labyrinthine-defective subjects.

Authors:  S Glasauer; M A Amorim; E Vitte; A Berthoz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  A multidimensional model of the effect of gravity on the spatial orientation of the monkey.

Authors:  D M Merfeld; L R Young; C M Oman; M J Shelhamer
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.435

8.  Estimation of passive horizontal linear whole-body displacement in humans.

Authors:  I Israël; N Chapuis; S Glasauer; O Charade; A Berthoz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Contribution of the otoliths to the calculation of linear displacement.

Authors:  I Israël; A Berthoz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Human perception of horizontal trunk and head rotation in space during vestibular and neck stimulation.

Authors:  T Mergner; C Siebold; G Schweigart; W Becker
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  16 in total

1.  Effects of galvanic vestibular stimulation during human walking.

Authors:  R C Fitzpatrick; D L Wardman; J L Taylor
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1999-06-15       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Visuo-vestibular interaction in the reconstruction of travelled trajectories.

Authors:  R J V Bertin; A Berthoz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-11-05       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Canal-otolith interactions and detection thresholds of linear and angular components during curved-path self-motion.

Authors:  Paul R MacNeilage; Amanda H Turner; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  Constructive perception of self-motion.

Authors:  Jan E Holly; Gin McCollum
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.435

5.  Integration of canal and otolith inputs by central vestibular neurons is subadditive for both active and passive self-motion: implication for perception.

Authors:  Jerome Carriot; Mohsen Jamali; Jessica X Brooks; Kathleen E Cullen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Virtual head rotation reveals a process of route reconstruction from human vestibular signals.

Authors:  Brian L Day; Richard C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-07-07       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Mathematical requirements of visual-vestibular integration.

Authors:  Douglas A Hanes
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 2.259

8.  Vestibular heading discrimination and sensitivity to linear acceleration in head and world coordinates.

Authors:  Paul R MacNeilage; Martin S Banks; Gregory C DeAngelis; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Evidence for cognitive vestibular integration impairment in idiopathic scoliosis patients.

Authors:  Martin Simoneau; Vincent Lamothe; Emilie Hutin; Pierre Mercier; Normand Teasdale; Jean Blouin
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 3.288

10.  Imagined self-motion differs from perceived self-motion: evidence from a novel continuous pointing method.

Authors:  Jennifer L Campos; Joshua H Siegle; Betty J Mohler; Heinrich H Bülthoff; Jack M Loomis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.