Literature DB >> 8884837

Diagnostic accuracy of direct digital dental radiography for the detection of periapical bone lesions: overall comparison between conventional and direct digital radiography.

B Kullendorff1, M Nilsson, M Rohlin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The diagnostic accuracy of direct digital radiography for the detection of small, experimentally made, periapical lesions was compared with that of E speed film. The high- and low-contrast resolutions of the imaging systems were also compared. STUDY
DESIGN: The high-contrast resolution was evaluated with a line pair plate. The low-contrast resolution was determined with a contrast-detail plexiglass phantom. To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy, the periapical region of dry human mandibles was examined. Receiver operating characteristic based on the readings of seven observers were generated.
RESULTS: The high-contrast resolution of the digital system was inferior, but the low-contrast resolution was comparable to that of E-speed film. For diagnostic accuracy no significant difference was seen between the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves.
CONCLUSIONS: The quality of the direct digital images is comparable to that of E-speed film for the detection of periapical bone lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8884837     DOI: 10.1016/s1079-2104(96)80364-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod        ISSN: 1079-2104


  11 in total

1.  Comparison of changes in dental and bone radiographic densities in the presence of different soft-tissue simulators using pixel intensity and digital subtraction analyses.

Authors:  R S de Molon; R G Batitucci; R Spin-Neto; G M Paquier; C E Sakakura; G M Tosoni; G Scaf
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  The effect of anatomical noise on perception of low contrast in intra-oral radiographs: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Lars Olsson; Mats Nilsson; Björn Svenson; Kristina Hellén-Halme
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Effect of two X-ray tube voltages on detection of approximal caries in digital radiographs. An in vitro study.

Authors:  Kristina Hellén-Halme
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Different digital imaging techniques in dental practice.

Authors:  Amela Lacević; Edina Vranić
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.363

5.  The Effects on Absorbed Dose Distribution in Intraoral X-ray Imaging When Using Tube Voltages of 60 and 70 kV for Bitewing Imaging.

Authors:  Kristina Hellén-Halme; Mats Nilsson
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2013-10-01

Review 6.  The missing link in image quality assessment in digital dental radiography.

Authors:  Kazutoshi Okamura; Kazunori Yoshiura
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2019-07-13       Impact factor: 1.852

7.  A comparative study on image quality of two digital intraoral sensors.

Authors:  Cinar Aziman; Kristina Hellén-Halme; Xie-Qi Shi
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 2.419

8.  Accuracy of digital radiography and cone beam computed tomography on periapical radiolucency detection in endodontically treated teeth.

Authors:  Tadas Venskutonis; Povilas Daugela; Marijus Strazdas; Gintaras Juodzbalys
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2014-07-01

9.  Accuracy of Cone Beam Computed Tomography, Photostimulable Phosphor Plate Digital Radiography and Conventional Radiography for Detection of Artificial Cancellous Bone Defects.

Authors:  Roghieh Bardal; Hassan Jahanihashemi; Maryam Mostafavi; Esmaeil Kalhor; Maryam Tofangchiha; Mahdieh Dehghani
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2015-11

10.  A comparative study of cone beam computed tomography and conventional radiography in diagnosing the extent of root resorptions.

Authors:  Elham Alamadi; Hisham Alhazmi; Ken Hansen; Ted Lundgren; Julia Naoumova
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 2.750

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.