Literature DB >> 15629022

Different digital imaging techniques in dental practice.

Amela Lacević1, Edina Vranić.   

Abstract

Different imaging techniques are used to pick up the signal of interest in digital sensors, including charge-coupled devices (CCD), complementary metal-oxide semiconductors (CMOS), photostimulable phosphors plates (PSP) and tuned-aperture computed tomography (TACT) Digital radiography sensors are divided into: storage phosphor plates (SPP) called photostimulable phosphor plates (PSP), silicon devices such as charge-coupled devices (CCD) or complementary metal oxide semiconductors (CMOS). Relatively new type of imaging that may hold advantage over current radiographic modalities is tuned-aperture computed tomography (TACT).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15629022      PMCID: PMC7250122          DOI: 10.17305/bjbms.2004.3412

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci        ISSN: 1512-8601            Impact factor:   3.363


  21 in total

1.  Identification of root canals in molars by tuned-aperture computed tomography.

Authors:  R Nance; D Tyndall; L G Levin; M Trope
Journal:  Int Endod J       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.264

2.  Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of digital imaging by using CCD and CMOS-APS sensors with E-speed film in the detection of periapical bony lesions.

Authors:  S B Paurazas; J R Geist; F E Pink; M M Hoen; H R Steiman
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2000-03

3.  In vivo accuracy and reliability of color-coded image enhancements for the assessment of periradicular lesion dimensions.

Authors:  W C Scarfe; V J Czerniejewski; A G Farman; S L Avant; R Molteni
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  1999-11

4.  Endodontic measurements in digital radiographs acquired by a photostimulable, storage phosphor system.

Authors:  E Borg; H G Gröndahl
Journal:  Endod Dent Traumatol       Date:  1996-02

5.  An evaluation of periapical radiography with a charge-coupled device.

Authors:  C H Versteeg; G C Sanderink; F C van Ginkel; P F van der Stelt
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  Experience of Norwegian general dental practitioners with solid state and storage phosphor detectors.

Authors:  A Wenzel; A Møystad
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.419

7.  Computed dental radiography: evaluation of a new charge-coupled device-based intraoral radiographic system.

Authors:  A G Farman; W C Scarfe; D B Schick; P M Rumack
Journal:  Quintessence Int       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 1.677

8.  Factors influencing the radiographic appearance of bony lesions.

Authors:  I B Bender
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 4.171

9.  A comparative evaluation of the diagnostic efficacy of film and digital sensors for detection of simulated periapical lesions.

Authors:  J A Wallace; M K Nair; M F Colaco; S F Kapa
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2001-07

10.  Pre-clinical performance comparing intraoral film and CCD-based systems.

Authors:  Tracey Malarkey Sommers; Sally M Mauriello; John B Ludlow; Enrique Platin; Donald A Tyndall
Journal:  J Dent Hyg       Date:  2002
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.