Literature DB >> 8873632

Recent trends in Canadian infant mortality rates: effect of changes in registration of live newborns weighing less than 500 g.

K S Joseph1, M S Kramer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To ascertain whether the increase in the crude infant mortality rate in Canada in 1993 was due to a recent increase in the registration of newborns weighing less than 500 g as live births.
DESIGN: Ecological study, with Poisson regression analysis.
SETTING: Canada.
SUBJECTS: All live births and infant deaths in Canada between 1987 and 1993, as reported by Statistics Canada. Data from Newfoundland were excluded because they were incomplete for 4 years. OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of live births by low-birth-weight category; and annual crude and adjusted infant mortality rates.
RESULTS: Over the study period the proportion of newborns weighing less than 500 g registered as live births increased significantly (chi 2 for trend = 71.26, p < 0.01). This trend was an isolated phenomenon rather than a general increase in all low-birth-weight categories (chi 2 for trend in the proportion of newborns weighing 500 to 2400 g registered as live births = 1.14, p = 0.28). The crude infant mortality rate per 1000 live births decreased from 6.4 in 1991 to 6.1 in 1992 and then increased to 6.3 in 1993. Poisson regression analysis revealed that the apparent increase in the infant mortality rate was caused by the increased registration of infants weighing less than 500 g as live births. The adjusted infant mortality estimate for 1993 was lower than that for 1992.
CONCLUSIONS: The increased infant mortality rate in Canada in 1993 appears to be due to increased registration of infants weighing less than 500 g as live births. Comparisons of infant mortality rates by place and time should be adjusted for the proportion of such live births, especially if the comparisons involve recent years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8873632      PMCID: PMC1335353     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  10 in total

1.  Estimability and estimation in case-referent studies.

Authors:  O Miettinen
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1976-02       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Attitudes to viability of preterm infants and their effect on figures for perinatal mortality.

Authors:  A C Fenton; D J Field; E Mason; M Clarke
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-02-17

3.  The reliability of perinatal mortality statistics in The Netherlands.

Authors:  J P Doornbos; H J Nordbeck; P E Treffers
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Perinatal mortality rates do not contain what they purport to contain.

Authors:  M J Keirse
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1984-05-26       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Limit of fetal viability.

Authors:  R D Milner; R W Beard
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1984-05-12       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 6.  Invited commentary: ecologic studies--biases, misconceptions, and counterexamples.

Authors:  S Greenland; J Robins
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1994-04-15       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  International infant mortality rates: bias from reporting differences.

Authors:  E M Howell; B Blondel
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  International rankings of infant mortality and the United States' vital statistics natality data collecting system--failure and success.

Authors:  S Sepkowitz
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 7.196

9.  The impact of extreme prematurity and congenital anomalies on the interpretation of international comparisons of infant mortality.

Authors:  B P Sachs; R C Fretts; R Gardner; S Hellerstein; N S Wampler; P H Wise
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Effect of changing the stillbirth definition on evaluation of perinatal mortality rates.

Authors:  P H Cartlidge; J H Stewart
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1995-08-19       Impact factor: 79.321

  10 in total
  19 in total

1.  Trends and variations in perinatal mortality and low birthweight: the contribution of socio-economic factors.

Authors:  I N Luginaah; K S Lee; T J Abernathy; D Sheehan; G Webster
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec

2.  Comparing international infant mortality rates.

Authors:  K S Joseph
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-09-05       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Infant mortality in Alberta and all of Canada.

Authors:  K S Joseph; Michael S Kramer; Alexander C Allen; Reg Sauve
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-03-29       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Alberta's infant mortality rate: the effect of the registration of live newborns weighing less than 500 grams.

Authors:  L W Svenson; D P Schopflocher; R S Sauve; C M Robertson
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  1998 May-Jun

5.  Perinatal mortality and its relationship to the reporting of low-birthweight infants.

Authors:  S T Phelan; R Goldenberg; G Alexander; S P Cliver
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Trends and variations in neonatal length of in-hospital stay in Canada.

Authors:  S W Wen; S Liu; D Fowler
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  1998 Mar-Apr

7.  A warning from the cradle?

Authors:  G Chance
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1997-09-01       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Recent trends in infant mortality rates and proportions of low-birth-weight live births in Canada.

Authors:  K S Joseph; M S Kramer
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1997-09-01       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Variations in mortality rates among Canadian neonatal intensive care units.

Authors:  Koravangattu Sankaran; Li-Yin Chien; Robin Walker; Mary Seshia; Arne Ohlsson
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-01-22       Impact factor: 8.262

10.  Regional patterns of infant mortality caused by lethal congenital anomalies.

Authors:  S W Wen; S Liu; K S Joseph; K Trouton; A Allen
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  1999 Sep-Oct
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.