Literature DB >> 7770264

The impact of extreme prematurity and congenital anomalies on the interpretation of international comparisons of infant mortality.

B P Sachs1, R C Fretts, R Gardner, S Hellerstein, N S Wampler, P H Wise.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify the potential impact that different definitions of live births and practice patterns have on infant mortality rates in England and Wales, France, Japan, and the United States.
METHODS: United States data were obtained from the 1986 linked national birth-infant death cohort, and those for the other countries came from either published sources or directly from the Ministries of Health.
RESULTS: In 1986 in the United States, infants weighing less than 1 kg accounted for 36% of deaths (32% white and 46% black); 32% resulted from fatal congenital anomalies. These rates were much higher in both categories than in England and Wales in 1990 (24 and 22%, respectively), France in 1990 (15 and 25%, respectively), and Japan in 1991 (9% for infants weighing less than 1 kg, percentage of fatal congenital anomalies unknown). These cases are more likely to be excluded from infant mortality statistics in their countries than in the United States.
CONCLUSIONS: In 1990, the United States infant mortality rate was 9.2 per 1000 live births, ranking the United States 19th internationally. However, infant mortality provides a poor comparative measure of reproductive outcome because there are enormous regional and international differences in clinical practices and in the way live births are classified. Future international and state comparisons of reproductive health should standardize the definition of a live birth and fatal congenital anomaly, and use weight-specific fetal-infant mortality ratios and perinatal statistics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7770264     DOI: 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00056-W

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  16 in total

1.  Effect of nonviable infants on the infant mortality rate in Philadelphia, 1992.

Authors:  E Gibson; J Culhane; T Saunders; D Webb; J Greenspan
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Home uterine activity monitoring in the prevention of very low birth weight.

Authors:  A Kempe; B P Sachs; H Ricciotti; A M Sobol; P H Wise
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

3.  Perinatal mortality and its relationship to the reporting of low-birthweight infants.

Authors:  S T Phelan; R Goldenberg; G Alexander; S P Cliver
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Recent trends in Canadian infant mortality rates: effect of changes in registration of live newborns weighing less than 500 g.

Authors:  K S Joseph; M S Kramer
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1996-10-15       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Infant mortality and congenital anomalies from 1950 to 1994: an international perspective.

Authors:  A Rosano; L D Botto; B Botting; P Mastroiacovo
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.710

6.  Trend of stillbirth rates and the associated risk factors in babol, northern iran.

Authors:  Karimollah Hajian-Tilaki; Seddegheh Esmaielzadeh; Ghazaleh Sadeghian
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2014-01

7.  Infant mortality and family welfare: policy implications for Indonesia.

Authors:  S Poerwanto; M Stevenson; N de Klerk
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 8.  Global Birth Prevalence of Spina Bifida by Folic Acid Fortification Status: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Callie A M Atta; Kirsten M Fiest; Alexandra D Frolkis; Nathalie Jette; Tamara Pringsheim; Christine St Germaine-Smith; Thilinie Rajapakse; Gilaad G Kaplan; Amy Metcalfe
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Sudden infant death syndrome: a re-examination of temporal trends.

Authors:  Sarka Lisonkova; Jennifer A Hutcheon; K S Joseph
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Why Is Infant Mortality Higher in the United States Than in Europe?

Authors:  Alice Chen; Emily Oster; Heidi Williams
Journal:  Am Econ J Econ Policy       Date:  2016-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.