Literature DB >> 6144886

Perinatal mortality rates do not contain what they purport to contain.

M J Keirse.   

Abstract

Three cases of perinatal death, of which two needed to be included in and one excluded from national perinatal mortality statistics, were presented to 1004 specialist and trainee obstetricians in northern Belgium (ie, Flanders) and the Netherlands. Of the respondents (52%), 69% admitted that they would report none of the cases and 13% would report all of them. Overreporting occurred twice as often and underreporting ten times as often as correct reporting--only 6% would apply the current regulations for registration of perinatal mortality correctly in all three cases. Although the statutory regulations with regard to the cases were similar in the two countries, there were differences between Belgian and Dutch doctors in their reporting of these three cases. This indicates that Belgian and Dutch perinatal mortality statistics do not measure the same thing and that neither contains what it purports to contain. The findings cast doubts on the validity of using national perinatal mortality figures as indicators of perinatal health or perinatal care in and between European countries.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Belgium; Data Collection; Data Reporting; Demographic Factors; Developed Countries; Europe; Evaluation; Evaluation Methodology; Fetal Death; Health Personnel; Infant Mortality; Measurement; Mortality; Netherlands; Physicians; Population; Population Dynamics; Reliability; Research Methodology; Western Europe

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6144886     DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(84)91405-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  15 in total

1.  Effect of nonviable infants on the infant mortality rate in Philadelphia, 1992.

Authors:  E Gibson; J Culhane; T Saunders; D Webb; J Greenspan
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Infant health and mortality indicators: their accuracy for monitoring the socio-economic development in the Europe of 1994.

Authors:  G Masuy-stroobant; C Gourbin
Journal:  Eur J Popul       Date:  1995

3.  Perinatal mortality and its relationship to the reporting of low-birthweight infants.

Authors:  S T Phelan; R Goldenberg; G Alexander; S P Cliver
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Attitudes to viability of preterm infants and their effect on figures for perinatal mortality.

Authors:  A C Fenton; D J Field; E Mason; M Clarke
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-02-17

5.  Recent trends in Canadian infant mortality rates: effect of changes in registration of live newborns weighing less than 500 g.

Authors:  K S Joseph; M S Kramer
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1996-10-15       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Birth weights in two rural hospitals in the United Republic of Tanzania.

Authors:  J van Roosmalen
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 9.408

7.  Quality of perinatal death registration. A study in Hainaut, Belgium.

Authors:  L Hertoghe; P De Wals; M Piron; F Bertrand; M F Lechat
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 3.183

8.  Perinatal statistics, 1984: a commentary on the first annual report of the Irish Perinatal Reporting System.

Authors:  P N Kirke
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 1.568

9.  Accuracy of fetal death reports: comparison with data from an independent stillbirth assessment program.

Authors:  A E Greb; R M Pauli; R S Kirby
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  International infant mortality rates: bias from reporting differences.

Authors:  E M Howell; B Blondel
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.