Literature DB >> 8178788

Invited commentary: ecologic studies--biases, misconceptions, and counterexamples.

S Greenland1, J Robins.   

Abstract

Many authors have pointed out that relative-risk estimates derived from ecologic data are vulnerable to biases not found in estimates derived from individual-level data. Nevertheless, biases in ecologic studies still are often dealt with in the same manner as biases in other observational studies, and so are not given adequate treatment. This commentary reviews and illustrates some of the more recent findings about bias in ecologic estimates. Special attention is given to problems of ecologic confounder control when individual risks follow a nonlinear model, and to misconceptions about ecologic bias that have appeared in the literature.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8178788     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  104 in total

1.  Ecological effects in multi-level studies.

Authors:  T A Blakely; A J Woodward
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Needs-based primary medical care capitation: development and evaluation of alternative approaches.

Authors:  B Hutchison; J Hurley; S Birch; J Lomas; S D Walter; J Eyles; F Stratford-Devai
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2000-02

3.  The association of dietary folate, B6, and B12 with cardiovascular mortality in Spain: an ecological analysis.

Authors:  M J Medrano; M J Sierra; J Almazán; M T Olalla; G López-Abente
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Assessing socioeconomic effects on different sized populations: to weight or not to weight?

Authors:  N Frohlich; K C Carriere; L Potvin; C Black
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.710

5.  On the importance of age-adjustment methods in ecological studies of social determinants of mortality.

Authors:  Jeffrey Milyo; Jennifer M Mellor
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Ecologic proxies for household income: how well do they work for the analysis of health and health care utilization?

Authors:  Murray M Finkelstein
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr

7.  Ecological Inference in the Social Sciences.

Authors:  Adam Glynn; Jon Wakefield
Journal:  Stat Methodol       Date:  2010-05-01

8.  The statistical power of epidemiological studies analyzing the relationship between exposure to ionizing radiation and cancer, with special reference to childhood leukemia and natural background radiation.

Authors:  M P Little; R Wakeford; J H Lubin; G M Kendall
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.841

9.  Firearms, youth homicide, and public health.

Authors:  Robert S Levine; Irwin Goldzweig; Barbara Kilbourne; Paul Juarez
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2012-02

10.  Confidence interval estimation for pooled-sample biomonitoring from a complex survey design.

Authors:  Samuel P Caudill
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 9.621

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.