Literature DB >> 2107894

Attitudes to viability of preterm infants and their effect on figures for perinatal mortality.

A C Fenton1, D J Field, E Mason, M Clarke.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine how local attitudes to management of extreme preterm labour can influence data on perinatal mortality.
DESIGN: One year prospective study in a geographically defined population.
SETTING: The 17 perinatal units of Trent region. PATIENTS: All preterm infants of less than or equal to 32 weeks' gestation in the Trent region.
INTERVENTIONS: Infants who had been considered viable at birth were referred for intensive care; those who had been considered non-viable received terminal care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Whether each infant was born alive, dead, or alive but considered non-viable.
RESULTS: Large differences were observed among units in the rates of delivery of infants of less than or equal to 27 weeks' gestation (rates varied from 7.2 to 0 per 1000 births). These differences were not present in the data relating to infants of between 28 and 32 weeks' gestation. The variation seemed to result from different approaches to the management of extreme preterm labour--that is, whether management took place in a labour ward or a gynaecology ward.
CONCLUSIONS: Place of delivery of premature babies (less than or equal to 27 weeks' gestation) may influence classification and hence figures for perinatal mortality. In addition, the fact that the onus of judgment regarding viability and classification is often placed on relatively junior staff might also affect the figures for perinatal mortality. The introduction of a standard recording system for all infants greater than 500 g would be advantageous.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2107894      PMCID: PMC1662236          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.300.6722.434

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  2 in total

1.  Perinatal mortality rates do not contain what they purport to contain.

Authors:  M J Keirse
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1984-05-26       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Is perinatal mortality still a good indicator of perinatal care?

Authors:  D J Field; H Smith; E Mason; A D Milner
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 3.980

  2 in total
  19 in total

1.  Trends and variations in perinatal mortality and low birthweight: the contribution of socio-economic factors.

Authors:  I N Luginaah; K S Lee; T J Abernathy; D Sheehan; G Webster
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec

2.  Severe retinopathy of prematurity and its association with different rates of survival in infants of less than 1251 g birth weight.

Authors:  J Vyas; D Field; E S Draper; G Woodruff; A R Fielder; J Thompson; N J Shaw; D Clark; R Gregson; J Burke; G Durbin
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.747

3.  Effect of nonviable infants on the infant mortality rate in Philadelphia, 1992.

Authors:  E Gibson; J Culhane; T Saunders; D Webb; J Greenspan
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Bench marking and performance management in neonatal care: easier said than done!

Authors:  D Field; B Manktelow; E S Draper
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.747

5.  Infant health and mortality indicators: their accuracy for monitoring the socio-economic development in the Europe of 1994.

Authors:  G Masuy-stroobant; C Gourbin
Journal:  Eur J Popul       Date:  1995

6.  Trends in prevalence and survival of very low birthweight infants, England and Wales: 1983-7.

Authors:  E Alberman; B Botting
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 3.791

7.  Trends in low birth weight: a comparison of two birth cohorts separated by a 15-year interval in Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.

Authors:  A A Silva; M A Barbieri; U A Gomes; H Bettiol
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 9.408

8.  Perinatal mortality and its relationship to the reporting of low-birthweight infants.

Authors:  S T Phelan; R Goldenberg; G Alexander; S P Cliver
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Attitudes to viability of preterm infants.

Authors:  A Macfarlane
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-04-07

10.  International infant mortality rates: bias from reporting differences.

Authors:  E M Howell; B Blondel
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.