Literature DB >> 8872262

Factors affecting the pullout strength of cancellous bone screws.

J R Chapman1, R M Harrington, K M Lee, P A Anderson, A F Tencer, D Kowalski.   

Abstract

Screws placed into cancellous bone in orthopedic surgical applications, such as fixation of fractures of the femoral neck or the lumbar spine, can be subjected to high loads. Screw pullout is a possibility, especially if low density osteoporotic bone is encountered. The overall goal of this study was to determine how screw thread geometry, tapping, and cannulation affect the holding power of screws in cancellous bone and determine whether current designs achieve maximum purchase strength. Twelve types of commercially available cannulated and noncannulated cancellous bone screws were tested for pullout strength in rigid unicellular polyurethane foams of apparent densities and shear strengths within the range reported for human cancellous bone. The experimentally derived pullout strength was compared to a predicted shear failure force of the internal threads formed in the polyurethane foam. Screws embedded in porous materials pullout by shearing the internal threads in the porous material. Experimental pullout force was highly correlated to the predicted shear failure force (slope = 1.05, R2 = 0.947) demonstrating that it is controlled by the major diameter of the screw, the length of engagement of the thread, the shear strength of the material into which the screw is embedded, and a thread shape factor (TSF) which accounts for screw thread depth and pitch. The average TSF for cannulated screws was 17 percent lower than that of noncannulated cancellous screws, and the pullout force was correspondingly less. Increasing the TSF, a result of decreasing thread pitch or increasing thread depth, increases screw purchase strength in porous materials. Tapping was found to reduce pullout force by an average of 8 percent compared with nontapped holes (p = 0.0001). Tapping in porous materials decreases screw pullout strength because the removal of material by the tap enlarges hole volume by an average of 27 percent, in effect decreasing the depth and shear area of the internal threads in the porous material.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8872262     DOI: 10.1115/1.2796022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   2.097


  73 in total

1.  High density polyetherurethane foam as a fragmentation and radiographic surrogate for cortical bone.

Authors:  C L Beardsley; A D Heiner; E A Brandser; J L Marsh; T D Brown
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2000

2.  Experimental in vivo acute and chronic biomechanical and histomorphometrical comparison of self-drilling and self-tapping anterior cervical screws.

Authors:  Maximiliano Aguiar Porto; Patrícia Silva; Rodrigo Rosa; José Batista Volpon; Antônio Carlos Shimano; Francisco José Albuquerque de Paula; Helton Luiz Aparecido Defino
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Advanced Multi-Axis Spine Testing: Clinical Relevance and Research Recommendations.

Authors:  Timothy P Holsgrove; Nikhil R Nayak; William C Welch; Beth A Winkelstein
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-07-17

4.  Accuracy of DXA scanning of the thoracic spine: cadaveric studies comparing BMC, areal BMD and geometric estimates of volumetric BMD against ash weight and CT measures of bone volume.

Authors:  Meena M Sran; Karim M Khan; Kathy Keiver; Jason B Chew; Heather A McKay; Thomas R Oxland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-12-23       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Mechanical behavior of screws in normal and osteoporotic bone.

Authors:  J Seebeck; J Goldhahn; M M Morlock; E Schneider
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-10-27       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Pull-out strength of the suprapedicle claw construct: a biomechanical study.

Authors:  Abdulrazzaq Alobaid; Vincent Arlet; Andre Busato; Thomas Steffen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-04-14       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  How pilot-hole size affects bone-screw pullout strength in human cadaveric cancellous bone.

Authors:  Mark Steeves; Craig Stone; John Mogaard; Stephanie Byrne
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 8.  [Stabilization of the osteoporotic spine from a biomechanical viewpoint].

Authors:  C-E Heyde; A Rohlmann; U Weber; R Kayser
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.087

9.  Local bone quality measurements correlates with maximum screw torque at the femoral diaphysis.

Authors:  Christopher M McAndrew; Avinesh Agarwalla; Adam C Abraham; Eric Feuchtbaum; William M Ricci; Simon Y Tang
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2018-02-03       Impact factor: 2.063

10.  Comparison and prediction of pullout strength of conical and cylindrical pedicle screws within synthetic bone.

Authors:  Wen-Chi Tsai; Po-Quang Chen; Tung-Wu Lu; Shing-Sheng Wu; Kao-Shang Shih; Shang-Chih Lin
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.