Literature DB >> 15830212

Pull-out strength of the suprapedicle claw construct: a biomechanical study.

Abdulrazzaq Alobaid1, Vincent Arlet, Andre Busato, Thomas Steffen.   

Abstract

The pull-out of the superior screw is a well recognized problem in anterior instrumentation of the spine for scoliosis. A biomechanical pull-out study of anterior vertebral body screw in cadaveric thoracic spine was therefore designed to investigate and compare the pull-out strength of three different anterior vertebral body fixations using the AO Universal Spine System: simple bicortical screw, bicortical screw with an opposite washer (sometimes called pull-out resistant nut), and a new construct made of a bicortical screw with the addition of a suprapedicular hook on the same vertebra (or claw construct). The T4 to T9 vertebral bodies from six human cadavers (total of 36 specimens) were instrumented with three different instrumentation constructs after measuring the bone mineral density of each individual vertebra. After stabilization of the vertebral bodies, the screws were extracted employing a material testing system using axial pull-out. The maximum axial forces were recorded at the time of the construct failure. The mean ultimate fixation strength (UFS) values after being adjusted for bone mineral density and vertebral body diameter were 631, 711, and 1244 N for the three different constructs, respectively (screw alone, screw with an opposite washer, and screw with a suprapedicle claw). The difference in UFS was not significant for the first two constructs tested (screw alone and screw with an opposite washer). However, the difference in ultimate fixation strength between the claw and the other constructs was highly significant (P<0.0001). Specimens with low BMD did not benefit as much from claw construct as the ones did with a normal BMD. The failure mode of each construct was described, but was in neither case judged dangerous for the spinal cord. This study shows that the suprapedicle claw construct improves the pull-out strength of an anterior vertebral body screw by 80%, and changes the mode of failure so as not to rely only on the screw characteristics or solely on the vertebral body. By adding a suprapedicle hook in a claw configuration, one may prevent superior screw pull-out in anterior spine surgery for scoliosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15830212      PMCID: PMC3489246          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-004-0805-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  11 in total

1.  The suprapedicle claw construct in anterior scoliosis surgery.

Authors:  Vincent Arlet; Jeffrey Shilt; Jean Ouellet
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-04-14       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  A biomechanical study of anterior thoracolumbar screw fixation.

Authors:  S W Breeze; B J Doherty; P S Noble; A LeBlanc; M H Heggeness
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Strength of fixation of anterior vertebral body screws.

Authors:  W C Horton; S F Blackstock; J T Norman; C S Hill; M A Feiertag; W C Hutton
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Factors affecting the pullout strength of cancellous bone screws.

Authors:  J R Chapman; R M Harrington; K M Lee; P A Anderson; A F Tencer; D Kowalski
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.097

5.  Anterior vertebral body screw pullout testing. A comparison of Zeilke, Kaneda, Universal Spine System, and Universal Spine System with pullout-resistant nut.

Authors:  I H Lieberman; R Khazim; T Woodside
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Comparison between single-screw and triangulated, double-screw fixation in anterior spine surgery. A biomechanical test.

Authors:  M Ogon; C Haid; M Krismer; W Sterzinger; R Bauer
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Optimizing bone screw pullout force.

Authors:  T A DeCoster; D B Heetderks; D J Downey; J S Ferries; W Jones
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.512

8.  Prospective radiographic and clinical outcomes and complications of single solid rod instrumented anterior spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  F A Sweet; L G Lenke; K H Bridwell; K M Blanke; J Whorton
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Comparison of anterior and posterior instrumentation for correction of adolescent thoracic idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  R R Betz; J Harms; D H Clements; L G Lenke; T G Lowe; H L Shufflebarger; D Jeszenszky; B Beele
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  The position of the aorta relative to the spine: a comparison of patients with and without idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Daniel J Sucato; Clark Duchene
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  3 in total

1.  The suprapedicle claw construct in anterior scoliosis surgery.

Authors:  Vincent Arlet; Jeffrey Shilt; Jean Ouellet
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-04-14       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Pullout strength of anterior spinal instrumentation: a product comparison of seven screws in calf vertebral bodies.

Authors:  Konrad Seller; Dieter Wahl; Alexander Wild; Rüdiger Krauspe; Erich Schneider; Berend Linke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-02-02       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Analysis of stress induced by screws in the vertebral fixation system.

Authors:  Sarah Fakher Fakhouri; Marcos Massao Shimano; Cleudmar Amaral de Araújo; Helton Luiz Aparecido Defino; Antônio Carlos Shimano
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 0.513

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.