Literature DB >> 8870531

Isolated and interrelated concepts.

R L Goldstone1.   

Abstract

A continuum between purely isolated and purely interrelated concepts is described. Along this continuum, a concept is interrelated to the extent that it is influenced by other concepts. Methods for manipulating and identifying a concept's degree of interrelatedness are introduced. Relatively isolated concepts can be empirically identified by a relatively large use of nondiagnostic features, and by better categorization performance for a concept's prototype than for a caricature of the concept. Relatively interrelated concepts can be identified by minimal use of nondiagnostic features, and by better categorization performance for a caricature than for a prototype. A concept is likely to be relatively isolated when subjects are instructed to create images for their concepts rather than find discriminating features, when concepts are given unrelated labels, and when the categories that are displayed alternate rarely between trials. The entire set of manipulations and measurements supports a graded distinction between isolated and interrelated concepts. The distinction is applied to current models of category learning, and a connectionist framework for interpreting the empirical results is presented.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8870531     DOI: 10.3758/bf03201087

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  25 in total

1.  Operationism and the concept of perception.

Authors:  W R GARNER; H W HAKE; C W ERIKSEN
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1956-05       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  ALCOVE: an exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning.

Authors:  J K Kruschke
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 3.  On the pragmatics of contrast.

Authors:  E V Clark
Journal:  J Child Lang       Date:  1990-06

4.  Tracing the footsteps of Sherlock Holmes: cognitive representations of hypothesis testing.

Authors:  L R Van Wallendael; R Hastie
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1990-05

5.  Aligning pictorial descriptions: an approach to object recognition.

Authors:  S Ullman
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1989-08

6.  Identification and ratings of caricatures: implications for mental representations of faces.

Authors:  G Rhodes; S Brennan; S Carey
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex.

Authors:  D H Hubel; T N Wiesel
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1968-03       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding.

Authors:  Irving Biederman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Problem structure and the use of base-rate information from experience.

Authors:  D L Medin; S M Edelson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1988-03

10.  Perceptual units in the acquisition of visual categories.

Authors:  H S Hock; C Tromley; L Polmann
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 3.051

View more
  34 in total

1.  (Non)complementary updating of belief in two hypotheses.

Authors:  C R McKenzie
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-01

2.  Consistent contrast aids concept learning.

Authors:  D Billman; D Dávila
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-10

3.  Comparing supervised and unsupervised category learning.

Authors:  Bradley C Love
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-12

4.  The multifaceted nature of unsupervised category learning.

Authors:  Bradley C Love
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-03

5.  Conceptual interrelatedness and caricatures.

Authors:  Robert L Goldstone; Mark Steyvers; Brian J Rogosky
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-03

Review 6.  A knowledge-resonance (KRES) model of category learning.

Authors:  Bob Rehder; Gregory L Murphy
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-12

7.  What is typical about the typicality effect in category-based induction?

Authors:  Jonathan R Rein; Micah B Goldwater; Arthur B Markman
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-04

8.  Category learning in the context of co-presented items.

Authors:  Janet K Andrews; Kenneth R Livingston; Kenneth J Kurtz
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2010-11-14

9.  Asymmetries in categorization, perceptual discrimination, and visual search for reference and nonreference exemplars.

Authors:  Olivier Corneille; Robert L Goldstone; Sarah Queller; Timothy Potter
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-04

10.  Context effects on musical chord categorization: Different forms of top-down feedback in speech and music?

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Joel L Dennhardt; Andrew Struck-Marcell
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.