Literature DB >> 20234027

What is typical about the typicality effect in category-based induction?

Jonathan R Rein1, Micah B Goldwater, Arthur B Markman.   

Abstract

Research on category-based induction has documented a consistent typicality effect: Typical exemplars promote stronger inferences about their broader category than atypical exemplars. This work has been largely confined to categories whose central tendencies are also the most typical members of the category. Does the typicality effect apply to the broad set of categories for which the ideal category member is considered most typical? In experiments with natural and artificial categories, typicality and induction-strength ratings were obtained for ideal and central-tendency exemplars. Induction strength was greatest for the central-tendency exemplars, regardless of whether the central tendency or the ideal was rated more typical. These results suggest that the so-called "typicality" effect is a special case of a more universal central-tendency effect in category-based induction.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20234027     DOI: 10.3758/MC.38.3.377

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  23 in total

1.  Conceptual interrelatedness and caricatures.

Authors:  Robert L Goldstone; Mark Steyvers; Brian J Rogosky
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-03

Review 2.  Category use and category learning.

Authors:  Arthur B Markman; Brian H Ross
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  Structured statistical models of inductive reasoning.

Authors:  Charles Kemp; Joshua B Tenenbaum
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Does rank have its privilege? Inductive inferences within folkbiological taxonomies.

Authors:  J D Coley; D L Medin; S Atran
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1997-07

5.  Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship.

Authors:  R M Nosofsky
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1986-03

6.  Ideals, central tendency, and frequency of instantiation as determinants of graded structure in categories.

Authors:  L W Barsalou
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  On the genesis of abstract ideas.

Authors:  M I Posner; S W Keele
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1968-07

8.  Inductive reasoning in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  E E Smith; J Rhee; K Dennis; M Grossman
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.310

9.  Similarity, plausibility, and judgments of probability.

Authors:  E E Smith; E Shafir; D Osherson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1993 Oct-Nov

10.  Ad hoc categories.

Authors:  L W Barsalou
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1983-05
View more
  3 in total

1.  Typicality mediates performance during category verification in both ad-hoc and well-defined categories.

Authors:  Chaleece Sandberg; Rajani Sebastian; Swathi Kiran
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 2.288

2.  Categorizing entities by common role.

Authors:  Micah B Goldwater; Arthur B Markman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-04

3.  Licensing Novel Role-Governed Categories: An ERP Analysis.

Authors:  Micah B Goldwater; Arthur B Markman; Logan T Trujillo; David M Schnyer
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 3.169

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.