Literature DB >> 8844184

Acoustic input impedance of the stapes and cochlea in human temporal bones.

S N Merchant1, M E Ravicz, J J Rosowski.   

Abstract

The acoustic input impedance of the stapes and cochlea ZSC represents the mechanical load driven by the tympanic membrane, malleus and incus. ZSC was calculated from broad-band measurements (20 Hz to 11 kHz) of stapes displacement made with an optical motion sensor and of sound pressure at the stapes head in a human temporal-bone preparation. Measurements were made in 12 fresh temporal bones with the round window insulated from the sound stimulus. Below 1 kHz, the magnitude of ZSC was approximately inversely proportional to frequency, and ZSC angle was between 0.10 and -0.20 periods. This behavior is consistent with a mixed stiffness and resistance. Between 1 and 4 kHz, ZSC was resistance-dominated with a magnitude between 40 and 100 mks acoustic G omega that was roughly independent of frequency, and its angle was between -0.12 and 0 periods. Between 4 and 7 kHz, the magnitude of ZSC was either constant or increased with frequency while ZSC angle was near 0. Between 7 and 8 kHz, both ZSC magnitude and angle decreased sharply with frequency, and both increased somewhat at higher frequencies. The input impedance of the cochlea ZC was estimated in one ear from ZSC measurements made before and after draining the inner ear fluids. ZC was stiffness-dominated below 100 HZ, and resistance-dominated from 100 Hz to 5 kHz. The frequency-dependent magnitude of ZSC in our bones is similar to those reported by other investigators in cadaver temporal bones (Nakamura et al., 1992; Kurokawa and Goode, 1995). Our ZSC measurements are qualitatively similar to theoretical predictions (Zwislocki, 1962; Kringlebotn, 1988), but are a factor of 3 greater in magnitude, implying that ZSC may be more resistive and stiffer than previously thought. We found inter-ear variations of a factor of 4 (12 dB), which may explain some of the clinically observed variations in size of the air bone gap in individuals with middle ear lesions or after middle-ear reconstructive surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8844184

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  19 in total

1.  Posture-induced changes in distortion-product otoacoustic emissions and the potential for noninvasive monitoring of changes in intracranial pressure.

Authors:  Susan E Voss; Nicholas J Horton; Taronne H P Tabucchi; Fopefolu O Folowosele; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.210

2.  The effect of methodological differences in the measurement of stapes motion in live and cadaver ears.

Authors:  Wade Chien; Michael E Ravicz; Saumil N Merchant; John J Rosowski
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2006-03-02       Impact factor: 1.854

3.  Gerbil middle-ear sound transmission from 100 Hz to 60 kHz.

Authors:  Michael E Ravicz; Nigel P Cooper; John J Rosowski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Finite element modeling of sound transmission with perforations of tympanic membrane.

Authors:  Rong Z Gan; Tao Cheng; Chenkai Dai; Fan Yang; Mark W Wood
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Simultaneous measurements of ossicular velocity and intracochlear pressure leading to the cochlear input impedance in gerbil.

Authors:  O de la Rochefoucauld; W F Decraemer; S M Khanna; E S Olson
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2008-05-06

6.  Elastic Properties of the Annular Ligament of the Human Stapes--AFM Measurement.

Authors:  Monika Kwacz; Zygmunt Rymuza; Marcin Michałowski; Jarosław Wysocki
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-06-04

7.  Inertial bone conduction: symmetric and anti-symmetric components.

Authors:  Namkeun Kim; Kenji Homma; Sunil Puria
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-03-01

8.  Finite-Element Modelling of the Acoustic Input Admittance of the Newborn Ear Canal and Middle Ear.

Authors:  Hamid Motallebzadeh; Nima Maftoon; Jacob Pitaro; W Robert J Funnell; Sam J Daniel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-10-07

9.  Attenuating the ear canal feedback pressure of a laser-driven hearing aid.

Authors:  Morteza Khaleghi; Sunil Puria
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Stapes displacement and intracochlear pressure in response to very high level, low frequency sounds.

Authors:  Nathaniel T Greene; Herman A Jenkins; Daniel J Tollin; James R Easter
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.