Literature DB >> 16757834

Posture-induced changes in distortion-product otoacoustic emissions and the potential for noninvasive monitoring of changes in intracranial pressure.

Susan E Voss1, Nicholas J Horton, Taronne H P Tabucchi, Fopefolu O Folowosele, Christopher A Shera.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring is currently an invasive procedure that requires access to the intracranial space through an opening in the skull. Noninvasive monitoring of ICP via the auditory system is theoretically possible because changes in ICP transfer to the inner ear through connections between the cerebral spinal fluid and the cochlear fluids. In particular, low-frequency distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs), measured noninvasively in the external ear canal, have magnitudes that depend on ICP. Postural changes in healthy humans cause systematic changes in ICP. Here, we quantify the effects of postural changes, and presumably ICP changes, on DPOAE magnitudes.
METHODS: DPOAE magnitudes were measured on seven normal-hearing, healthy subjects at four postural positions on a tilting table (angles 90 degrees , 0 degrees , - 30 degrees , and - 45 degrees to the horizontal). At these positions, it is expected that ICP varied from about 0 (90 degrees ) to 22 mm Hg ( - 45 degrees ). DPOAE magnitudes were measured for a set of frequencies 750 < f2 < 4000, with f2/f1 = 1.2.
RESULTS: For the low-frequency range of 750 <or=f2<or= 1500, the differences in DPOAE magnitude between upright and - 45 degrees were highly significant (all p < 0.01), and above 1500 Hz there were minimal differences between magnitudes at 90 degrees versus - 45 degrees. There were no significant differences in the DPOAE magnitudes with subjects at 90 degrees and 0 degrees postures.
CONCLUSIONS: Changes in ICP can be detected using the auditory-based measurement of DPOAEs. In particular, changes are largest at low frequencies. Although this approach does not allow for absolute measurement of ICP, it appears that measurement of DPOAEs may be a useful means of noninvasively monitoring ICP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16757834     DOI: 10.1385/NCC:4:3:251

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurocrit Care        ISSN: 1541-6933            Impact factor:   3.210


  28 in total

1.  Detection of intracochlear and intracranial pressure changes with otoacoustic emissions: a gerbil model.

Authors:  Béla Büki; Emile de Kleine; Hero P Wit; Paul Avan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Positional changes and stabilization of middle ear pressure.

Authors:  M Gaihede; D Kjaer
Journal:  Auris Nasus Larynx       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 1.863

3.  Acoustic input impedance of the stapes and cochlea in human temporal bones.

Authors:  S N Merchant; M E Ravicz; J J Rosowski
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Neonatal hearing screening with otoscopy, auditory brain stem response, and otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  K J Doyle; B Burggraaff; S Fujikawa; J Kim; C J MacArthur
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.497

5.  Families of lines: random effects in linear regression analysis.

Authors:  H A Feldman
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1988-04

6.  Repeatability of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in normally hearing humans.

Authors:  J Roede; F P Harris; R Probst; L Xu
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1993 Sep-Oct

7.  Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system.

Authors:  D T Kemp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Random-effects models for longitudinal data.

Authors:  N M Laird; J H Ware
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Hydrostatic pressure in the inner ear fluid compartments and its effects on inner ear function.

Authors:  A Böhmer
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol Suppl       Date:  1993

10.  Impedance measurement as a noninvasive technique for the monitoring of intracranial pressure variations.

Authors:  M Magnano; R Albera; M Lacilla; A Gabini; M Naddeo; D Bruno
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1994 Jul-Aug
View more
  18 in total

1.  Distortion product otoacoustic emissions for assessment of intracranial hypertension at extreme altitude?

Authors:  Bernhard Olzowy; Gregor von Gleichenstein; Martin Canis; Klaus Mees
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2008-01-11       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Posture-induced changes of ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials suggest a modulation by intracranial pressure.

Authors:  Claudia Jerin; Robert Gürkov
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-03-29       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Non-invasive intracranial pressure assessment.

Authors:  Llewellyn C Padayachy
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 1.475

4.  Endolymphatic hydrops in idiopathic intracranial hypertension: prevalence and clinical outcome after lumbar puncture. Preliminary data.

Authors:  Angelo Ranieri; Michele Cavaliere; Stefania Sicignano; Pietro Falco; Federico Cautiero; Roberto De Simone
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 3.307

Review 5.  Noninvasive assessment of cerebrospinal fluid pressure.

Authors:  Beau B Bruce
Journal:  J Neuroophthalmol       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.042

6.  Posture systematically alters ear-canal reflectance and DPOAE properties.

Authors:  Susan E Voss; Modupe F Adegoke; Nicholas J Horton; Kevin N Sheth; Jonathan Rosand; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Towards a joint reflection-distortion otoacoustic emission profile: Results in normal and impaired ears.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Radha Kalluri
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Ophthalmodynamometry for ICP prediction and pilot test on Mt. Everest.

Authors:  Henry W Querfurth; Philip Lieberman; Steve Arms; Steve Mundell; Michael Bennett; Craig van Horne
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 2.474

9.  Can intracranial pressure be measured non-invasively bedside using a two-depth Doppler-technique?

Authors:  Lars-Owe D Koskinen; Jan Malm; Rolandas Zakelis; Laimonas Bartusis; Arminas Ragauskas; Anders Eklund
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 2.502

10.  Level alterations of the 2f (1)-f (2) distortion product due to hypoxia in the guinea pig depend on the stimulus frequency.

Authors:  Bernhard Olzowy; Gregor von Gleichenstein; Martin Canis; Nikolaus Plesnila; Sebastian Strieth; Christoph Deppe; Klaus Mees
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.