Literature DB >> 8836984

Effect of stimulus intensity and voluntary contraction on corticospinal potentials following transcranial magnetic stimulation.

K Kaneko1, S Kawai, Y Fuchigami, G Shiraishi, T Ito.   

Abstract

Following magnetic transcranial stimulation, motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) from the abductor digiti minimi muscle, and evoked spinal cord potentials (ESCPs) from the cervical epidural space were recorded simultaneously in 9 subjects in the awake and anesthetized condition. In the awake condition, during voluntary contraction, one (n = 5) or two (n = 4) components of the ESCPs were elicited at the threshold stimulus intensity of the MEPs. As the stimulus intensity increased, an early response (n = 7) and multiple late components were recorded. The first component at high stimulus output (average 80%) preceded the small potentials elicited at threshold stimulus intensity. The latency of each component of the ESCPs during voluntary contraction was the same as that during the resting condition. In addition, the enhancement of amplitude of the ESCPs during voluntary contraction was not significant compared with that recorded at rest. During general anesthesia with volatile anesthetics, the first component of the ESCPs could be elicited at high stimulus intensity, but later components were markedly attenuated. In paired transcranial magnetic stimulation, the amplitude of this first potential following the test stimulus completely recovered within the 2 ms interstimulus interval. From these results, we hypothesized that the first component was generated non-synaptically (D-wave), but later components were generated transsynaptically (I-waves). Compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) and F-waves also were recorded following supramaximal ulnar nerve stimulation at the wrist. Peripheral conduction time, which included synaptic delay in spinal motor neurons, was measured as follows (latency of CMAPs+ latency of F-wave + 1)/2 (ms). The central motor conduction time (CMCT) was measured by subtracting the peripheral conduction time from the onset latency of the MEP at high stimulus intensity in the awake state. During voluntary contraction, the calculated CMCT (4.9 +/- 1.0 ms) was the same as the onset latency of the second component of the ESCPs (I-wave, 4.3 +/- 0.2 ms) recorded from the C6-C6/7 epidural space. These results suggest that transcranial magnetic stimulation generates I-waves preferentially when the stimulus intensity was set at just the threshold level of the MEPs during voluntary contraction in the awake condition. At high stimulus intensity, transcranial magnetic stimulation can elicit both D- and I-waves, but most spinal cells require I-wave activation to fire. Facilitatory effects of voluntary contraction on the muscle response following transcranial magnetic stimulation mainly originates at a spinal level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8836984

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Sci        ISSN: 0022-510X            Impact factor:   3.181


  22 in total

Review 1.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation: studying the brain-behaviour relationship by induction of 'virtual lesions'.

Authors:  A Pascual-Leone; D Bartres-Faz; J P Keenan
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1999-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Interaction of transcranial magnetic stimulation and electrical transmastoid stimulation in human subjects.

Authors:  Janet L Taylor; N T Petersen; Jane E Butler; S C Gandevia
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 3.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation: studying motor neurophysiology of psychiatric disorders.

Authors:  Fumiko Maeda; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2003-06-26       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Training-induced modifications of corticospinal reactivity in severely affected stroke survivors.

Authors:  Ruth N Barker; Sandra G Brauer; Benjamin K Barry; Toby J Gill; Richard G Carson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Functional demanded excitability changes of human hand motor area.

Authors:  Zhen Ni; Makoto Takahashi; Takamasa Yamashita; Nan Liang; Yoshiyuki Tanaka; Toshio Tsuji; Susumu Yahagi; Tatsuya Kasai
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-19       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Influence of sensory deprivation and perturbation of trigeminal afferent fibers on corticomotor control of human tongue musculature.

Authors:  L Halkjaer; B Melsen; A S McMillan; P Svensson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-17       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Physiological processes influencing motor-evoked potential duration with voluntary contraction.

Authors:  Mehdi A J van den Bos; Nimeshan Geevasinga; Parvathi Menon; David Burke; Matthew C Kiernan; Steve Vucic
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Mechanisms of motor-evoked potential facilitation following prolonged dual peripheral and central stimulation in humans.

Authors:  M C Ridding; J L Taylor
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-12-01       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Men and women exhibit a similar time to task failure for a sustained, submaximal elbow extensor contraction.

Authors:  Douglas J Dearth; Jonathan Umbel; Richard L Hoffman; David W Russ; Thad E Wilson; Brian C Clark
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-12-19       Impact factor: 3.078

10.  Neural correlate of the contextual interference effect in motor learning: a kinematic analysis.

Authors:  Chien-Ho Janice Lin; Beth E Fisher; Allan D Wu; Yi-An Ko; Lung-Yee Lee; Carolee J Winstein
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.328

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.