Literature DB >> 19366656

Neural correlate of the contextual interference effect in motor learning: a kinematic analysis.

Chien-Ho Janice Lin1, Beth E Fisher, Allan D Wu, Yi-An Ko, Lung-Yee Lee, Carolee J Winstein.   

Abstract

The contextual interference (CI) effect affirms that learning is enhanced when interference during practice is high, such as when participants practice multiple tasks in a random order. Previous research showed a distinct response in the cortical motor (CM) regions of participants performing under high CI practice conditions compared with low CI conditions. Specifically, there was increased corticomotor activity in a high CI condition when participants practiced 3 arm tasks, each with specific spatial and temporal requirements. Using disruptive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), the authors' purpose was to determine whether CM is preferentially processing the spatial, temporal, or both parameters of the task during high CI practice. Participants were randomized to 1 of 6 practice conditions derived from 3 stimulation conditions (no TMS, TMS, sham TMS) and 2 CI conditions (blocked [low CI] and random [high CI]). The authors measured performance accuracy in movement timing (temporal) and amplitude (spatial) across practice and no-stimulation recall phases. TMS perturbation deterred learning of movement timing under random, but not blocked, practice order; the authors did not observe this in spatial parameter learning. The authors' data suggest that increased corticomotor activity during high CI practice may reflect preferential processing of the temporal parameter of the task.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19366656      PMCID: PMC2687810          DOI: 10.3200/JMBR.41.3.232-242

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mot Behav        ISSN: 0022-2895            Impact factor:   1.328


  57 in total

1.  Total activation change of visual and motor area due to various disturbances.

Authors:  S C Chung; B C Min; C J Kim; Z H Cho
Journal:  J Physiol Anthropol Appl Human Sci       Date:  2000-03

2.  Evidence for a dynamic-dominance hypothesis of handedness.

Authors:  Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-11-22       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The contextual interference effect in acquisition of dart-throwing skill tested on a transfer test with extended trials.

Authors:  C M Meira; G Tani
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  2001-06

Review 4.  The neurobiology of learning and memory: some reminders to remember.

Authors:  L Cahill; J L McGaugh; N M Weinberger
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 13.837

5.  Movement-related cortical potentials: their relationship to the laterality, complexity and learning of a movement.

Authors:  T Demiralp; S Karamürsel; Y E Karakullukçu; N Gökhan
Journal:  Int J Neurosci       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 2.292

6.  The contribution of elaborative processing to the contextual interference effect.

Authors:  D L Wright; Y Li; C Whitacre
Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.500

7.  The human dorsal premotor cortex generates on-line error corrections during sensorimotor adaptation.

Authors:  Ji-Hang Lee; Paul van Donkelaar
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-03-22       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  When forgetting benefits motor retention.

Authors:  J B Shea; D L Wright
Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 2.500

9.  Short-term brain 'plasticity' in humans: transient finger representation changes in sensory cortex somatotopy following ischemic anesthesia.

Authors:  P M Rossini; G Martino; L Narici; A Pasquarelli; M Peresson; V Pizzella; F Tecchio; G Torrioli; G L Romani
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1994-04-11       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Mapping of cortical sites where transcranial magnetic stimulation results in delay of voluntary movement.

Authors:  J L Taylor; D S Wagener; J G Colebatch
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-12
View more
  5 in total

1.  Learning through observation: a combination of expert and novice models favors learning.

Authors:  Hassan Rohbanfard; Luc Proteau
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Differential contribution of the supplementary motor area to stabilization of a procedural motor skill acquired through different practice schedules.

Authors:  Satoshi Tanaka; Manabu Honda; Takashi Hanakawa; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-12-27       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  White matter microstructural correlates of superior long-term skill gained implicitly under randomized practice.

Authors:  Sunbin Song; Nikhil Sharma; Ethan R Buch; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-09-12       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 4.  Rewiring the brain: potential role of the premotor cortex in motor control, learning, and recovery of function following brain injury.

Authors:  Shailesh S Kantak; James W Stinear; Ethan R Buch; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 3.919

5.  Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the primary motor cortex does not enhance the learning benefits of self-controlled feedback schedules.

Authors:  Michael J Carter; Victoria Smith; Anthony N Carlsen; Diane M Ste-Marie
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-02-27
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.