Literature DB >> 28031404

Physiological processes influencing motor-evoked potential duration with voluntary contraction.

Mehdi A J van den Bos1, Nimeshan Geevasinga1, Parvathi Menon1,2, David Burke1,3, Matthew C Kiernan1,3,4, Steve Vucic5,2.   

Abstract

Voluntary contraction leads to facilitation of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) producing greater amplitude, shorter onset latency, and prolonged duration of the electromyography potential. Whereas hyperexcitability of spinal motoneurons and changes in descending corticospinal volleys have been proposed as putative mechanisms for changes in MEP amplitude and onset latency, a contribution of propriospinal interneurons, exerting modulatory effects on α-motoneurons, has been proposed as a potential explanation for prolongation of MEP duration. The aim of the present study is to gain further insight into the physiological processes underlying changes in MEP duration. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) studies were undertaken on 30 healthy controls, using a 90-mm circular coil, with MEPs recorded at rest and during facilitation, produced by contraction of abductor pollicis brevis. In the same experiment, short interval-intracortical inhibition (SICI) was recorded at rest. Facilitation resulted in a significant prolongation of MEP duration, which increased with stimulus intensity and was accompanied by an increase in MEP amplitude. The main effect (TMS intensity × activation state) was correlated with MEP duration (F = 10.9, P < 0.001), whereas TMS intensity (F = 30.5, P < 0.001) and activation state (F = 125.8, P < 0.001) in isolation were correlated with MEP amplitude. There was a significant inverse relationship between SICI and MEP duration at rest (R2 = 0.141, P = 0.041) and during facilitation (R2 = 0.340, P = 0.001). The present findings suggest that similar physiological processes mediate changes in the facilitated MEP duration and amplitude and that both cortical and nonpropriospinal spinal mechanisms contribute to changes in MEP duration.NEW &amp; NOTEWORTHY Muscle contraction is associated with a significant increase in motor-evoked potential (MEP) duration and amplitude. Whereas the increase in MEP duration was linear, the amplitude increase exhibited a ceiling effect. Importantly, the MEP duration increase strongly correlated with short interval-intracortical inhibition, a biomarker of motor cortical function. This suggests that whereas similar physiological processes contribute to changes in facilitated MEP duration and amplitude, cortical mechanisms appear to contribute to MEP duration changes.
Copyright © 2017 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MEP duration; cortical processes; propriospinal

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28031404      PMCID: PMC5340882          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00832.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  37 in total

1.  Enhanced propriospinal excitation from hand muscles to wrist flexors during reach-to-grasp in humans.

Authors:  Louis-Solal Giboin; Alexandra Lackmy-Vallée; David Burke; Véronique Marchand-Pauvert
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  I-wave origin and modulation.

Authors:  V Di Lazzaro; P Profice; F Ranieri; F Capone; M Dileone; A Oliviero; F Pilato
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 8.955

3.  Assessment of cortical excitability using threshold tracking techniques.

Authors:  Steve Vucic; James Howells; Louise Trevillion; Matthew C Kiernan
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.217

4.  Properties of propriospinal neurons in the C3-C4 segments mediating disynaptic pyramidal excitation to forelimb motoneurons in the macaque monkey.

Authors:  Tadashi Isa; Yukari Ohki; Kazuhiko Seki; Bror Alstermark
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-02-22       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Short-interval cortical inhibition and intracortical facilitation during submaximal voluntary contractions changes with fatigue.

Authors:  Sandra K Hunter; Chris J McNeil; Jane E Butler; Simon C Gandevia; Janet L Taylor
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Motor cortex stimulation in intact man. 2. Multiple descending volleys.

Authors:  B L Day; J C Rothwell; P D Thompson; J P Dick; J M Cowan; A Berardelli; C D Marsden
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 7.  Transmission of the cortical command for human voluntary movement through cervical propriospinal premotoneurons.

Authors:  E Pierrot-Deseilligny
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  1996 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 11.685

8.  Effects produced in human arm and forearm motoneurones after electrical stimulation of ulnar and median nerves at wrist level.

Authors:  G Lourenço; C Iglesias; V Marchand-Pauvert
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-11-08       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Primary motor cortex of the parkinsonian monkey: altered encoding of active movement.

Authors:  Benjamin Pasquereau; Mahlon R DeLong; Robert S Turner
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  Clinical Value of the Assessment of Changes in MEP Duration with Voluntary Contraction.

Authors:  Marisa Brum; Christopher Cabib; Josep Valls-Solé
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 4.677

View more
  7 in total

1.  Characterizing off-target corticospinal responses to double-cone transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  F Proessl; M C Canino; M E Beckner; A M Sinnott; S R Eagle; A D LaGoy; W R Conkright; A J Sterczala; C Connaboy; F Ferrarelli; A Germain; B C Nindl; S D Flanagan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-02-06       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Motor evoked potential latency and duration from tibialis anterior in individuals with chronic stroke.

Authors:  Brice T Cleland; Emily Sisel; Sangeetha Madhavan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 2.064

3.  Motor corticospinal excitability: a novel facet of pain modulation?

Authors:  Yelena Granovsky; Elliot Sprecher; Alon Sinai
Journal:  Pain Rep       Date:  2019-03-08

4.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation reveals diminished homoeostatic metaplasticity in cognitively impaired adults.

Authors:  Mark H Sundman; Koeun Lim; Viet Ton That; Jack-Morgan Mizell; Chidi Ugonna; Rudolph Rodriguez; Nan-Kuei Chen; Andrew J Fuglevand; Yilin Liu; Robert C Wilson; Jean-Marc Fellous; Steven Rapcsak; Ying-Hui Chou
Journal:  Brain Commun       Date:  2020-11-27

5.  Integration of Convergent Sensorimotor Inputs Within Spinal Reflex Circuits in Healthy Adults.

Authors:  Alejandro J Lopez; Jiang Xu; Maruf M Hoque; Carly McMullen; Trisha M Kesar; Michael R Borich
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Evaluating the Effects of 5-Hz Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation With and Without Wrist-Ankle Acupuncture on Improving Spasticity and Motor Function in Children With Cerebral Palsy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Jiamin Li; Cen Chen; Shenyu Zhu; Xiulian Niu; Xidan Yu; Jie Ren; Min Shen
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Intracortical and Intercortical Motor Disinhibition to Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Newly Diagnosed Celiac Disease Patients.

Authors:  Francesco Fisicaro; Giuseppe Lanza; Carmela Cinzia D'Agate; Raffaele Ferri; Mariagiovanna Cantone; Luca Falzone; Giovanni Pennisi; Rita Bella; Manuela Pennisi
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 5.717

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.