Literature DB >> 22777103

Training-induced modifications of corticospinal reactivity in severely affected stroke survivors.

Ruth N Barker1, Sandra G Brauer, Benjamin K Barry, Toby J Gill, Richard G Carson.   

Abstract

When permitted access to the appropriate forms of rehabilitation, many severely affected stroke survivors demonstrate a capacity for upper limb functional recovery well in excess of that formerly considered possible. Yet, the mechanisms through which improvements in arm function occur in such profoundly impaired individuals remain poorly understood. An exploratory study was undertaken to investigate the capacity for brain plasticity and functional adaptation, in response to 12-h training of reaching using the SMART Arm device, in a group of severely affected stroke survivors with chronic upper limb paresis. Twenty-eight stroke survivors were enroled. Eleven healthy adults provided normative data. To assess the integrity of ipsilateral and contralateral corticospinal pathways, transcranial magnetic stimulation was applied to evoke responses in triceps brachii during an elbow extension task. When present, contralateral motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) were delayed and reduced in amplitude compared to those obtained in healthy adults. Following training, contralateral responses were more prevalent and their average onset latency was reduced. There were no reliable changes in ipsilateral MEPs. Stroke survivors who exhibited contralateral MEPs prior to training achieved higher levels of arm function and exhibited greater improvements in performance than those who did not initially exhibit contralateral responses. Furthermore, decreases in the onset latency of contralateral MEPs were positively related to improvements in arm function. Our findings demonstrate that when severely impaired stroke survivors are provided with an appropriate rehabilitation modality, modifications of corticospinal reactivity occur in association with sustained improvements in upper limb function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22777103     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-012-3163-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  54 in total

Review 1.  Plasticity of the human motor cortex and recovery from stroke.

Authors:  M Hallett
Journal:  Brain Res Brain Res Rev       Date:  2001-10

2.  Analysis of recovery processes after stroke by means of transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Hank T Hendricks; Jaco W Pasman; Johannes L Merx; Jacques van Limbeek; Machiel J Zwarts
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.177

3.  Rehabilitation of reaching after stroke: task-related training versus progressive resistive exercise.

Authors:  Gergory T Thielman; Catherine M Dean; A M Gentile
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.966

4.  Predictors of stroke outcome using objective measurement scales.

Authors:  S C Loewen; B A Anderson
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 7.914

5.  Spinal cord terminations of the medial wall motor areas in macaque monkeys.

Authors:  R P Dum; P L Strick
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1996-10-15       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Corticomotor threshold to magnetic stimulation: normal values and repeatability.

Authors:  K R Mills; K A Nithi
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.217

7.  Reliability of the Modified Motor Assessment Scale and the Barthel Index.

Authors:  S C Loewen; B A Anderson
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1988-07

8.  Functional potential in chronic stroke patients depends on corticospinal tract integrity.

Authors:  Cathy M Stinear; P Alan Barber; Peter R Smale; James P Coxon; Melanie K Fleming; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 9.  Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review.

Authors:  Gert Kwakkel; Boudewijn J Kollen; Hermano I Krebs
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2007-09-17       Impact factor: 3.919

10.  Reorganization of the human ipsilesional premotor cortex after stroke.

Authors:  Esteban A Fridman; Takashi Hanakawa; Melissa Chung; Friedhelm Hummel; Ramon C Leiguarda; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2004-01-28       Impact factor: 13.501

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  The uses and interpretations of the motor-evoked potential for understanding behaviour.

Authors:  Sven Bestmann; John W Krakauer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Upper Limbs Muscle Co-contraction Changes Correlated With the Impairment of the Corticospinal Tract in Stroke Survivors: Preliminary Evidence From Electromyography and Motor-Evoked Potential.

Authors:  Wenfei Sheng; Shijue Li; Jiangli Zhao; Yujia Wang; Zichong Luo; Wai Leung Ambrose Lo; Minghui Ding; Chuhuai Wang; Le Li
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 5.152

3.  Repetitive reaching training combined with transcranial Random Noise Stimulation in stroke survivors with chronic and severe arm paresis is feasible: a pilot, triple-blind, randomised case series.

Authors:  Kathryn S Hayward; Sandra G Brauer; Kathy L Ruddy; David Lloyd; Richard G Carson
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 4.262

4.  TMS-Induced Central Motor Conduction Time at the Non-Infarcted Hemisphere Is Associated with Spontaneous Motor Recovery of the Paretic Upper Limb after Severe Stroke.

Authors:  Maurits H J Hoonhorst; Rinske H M Nijland; Cornelis H Emmelot; Boudewijn J Kollen; Gert Kwakkel
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-05-15

5.  The efficacy of SMART Arm training early after stroke for stroke survivors with severe upper limb disability: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Sandra G Brauer; Kathryn S Hayward; Richard G Carson; Andrew G Cresswell; Ruth N Barker
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 2.474

6.  Interhemispheric Pathways Are Important for Motor Outcome in Individuals with Chronic and Severe Upper Limb Impairment Post Stroke.

Authors:  Kathryn S Hayward; Jason L Neva; Cameron S Mang; Sue Peters; Katie P Wadden; Jennifer K Ferris; Lara A Boyd
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 3.599

7.  A Bout of High Intensity Interval Training Lengthened Nerve Conduction Latency to the Non-exercised Affected Limb in Chronic Stroke.

Authors:  Beraki Abraha; Arthur R Chaves; Liam P Kelly; Elizabeth M Wallack; Katie P Wadden; Jason McCarthy; Michelle Ploughman
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 4.566

8.  The Strength of the Corticospinal Tract Not the Reticulospinal Tract Determines Upper-Limb Impairment Level and Capacity for Skill-Acquisition in the Sub-Acute Post-Stroke Period.

Authors:  Ulrike Hammerbeck; Sarah F Tyson; Prawin Samraj; Kristen Hollands; John W Krakauer; John Rothwell
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2021-07-04       Impact factor: 3.919

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.