Literature DB >> 20024575

Men and women exhibit a similar time to task failure for a sustained, submaximal elbow extensor contraction.

Douglas J Dearth1, Jonathan Umbel, Richard L Hoffman, David W Russ, Thad E Wilson, Brian C Clark.   

Abstract

Sex differences in muscle fatigue-resistance have been observed in a variety of muscles and under several conditions. This study compared the time to task failure (TTF) of a sustained isometric elbow extensor (intensity 15% of maximal strength) contraction in young men (n = 12) and women (n = 11), and examined if their neurophysiologic adjustments to fatigue differed. Motor-evoked potential amplitude (MEP), silent period duration, interference electromyogram (EMG) amplitude, maximal muscle action potential (M (max)), heart rate, and mean arterial pressure were measured at baseline, during the task, and during a 2-min ischemia period. Men and women did not differ in TTF (478.2 +/- 31.9 vs. 500.4 +/- 41.3 s; P = 0.67). We also performed an exploratory post hoc cluster analysis, and classified subjects as low (n = 15) or high endurance (n = 8) based on TTF (415.3 +/- 16.0 vs. 626.7 +/- 25.8 s, respectively). The high-endurance group exhibited a lower MEP and EMG at baseline (MEP 16.3 +/- 4.1 vs. 37.2 +/- 3.0% M (max), P < 0.01; EMG 0.98 +/- 0.18 vs. 1.85 +/- 0.26% M (max), P = 0.03). These findings suggest no sex differences in elbow extensor fatigability, in contrast to observations from other muscle groups. The cluster analyses results indicated that high- and low-endurance groups displayed neurophysiologic differences at baseline (before performing the fatigue task), but that they did not differ in fatigue-induced changes in their neurophysiologic adjustments to the task.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20024575     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-009-1323-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  33 in total

Review 1.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation in neurology.

Authors:  Masahito Kobayashi; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 44.182

Review 2.  TMS and drugs.

Authors:  Ulf Ziemann
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Supraspinal fatigue does not explain the sex difference in muscle fatigue of maximal contractions.

Authors:  Sandra K Hunter; Jane E Butler; Gabrielle Todd; Simon C Gandevia; Janet L Taylor
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2006-05-25

Review 4.  Sex differences in human skeletal muscle fatigue.

Authors:  A L Hicks; J Kent-Braun; D S Ditor
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 6.230

5.  Impaired response of human motoneurones to corticospinal stimulation after voluntary exercise.

Authors:  S C Gandevia; N Petersen; J E Butler; J L Taylor
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1999-12-15       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 6.  The physiological basis of transcranial motor cortex stimulation in conscious humans.

Authors:  V Di Lazzaro; A Oliviero; F Pilato; E Saturno; M Dileone; P Mazzone; A Insola; P A Tonali; J C Rothwell
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.708

7.  Sex differences in human skeletal muscle fatigue are eliminated under ischemic conditions.

Authors:  David W Russ; Jane A Kent-Braun
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2003-01-31

8.  Mechanisms of fatigue differ after low- and high-force fatiguing contractions in men and women.

Authors:  Tejin Yoon; Bonnie Schlinder Delap; Erin E Griffith; Sandra K Hunter
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.217

Review 9.  Sex differences and mechanisms of task-specific muscle fatigue.

Authors:  Sandra K Hunter
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 6.230

10.  Central fatigue explains sex differences in muscle fatigue and contralateral cross-over effects of maximal contractions.

Authors:  Peter G Martin; Jodie Rattey
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 3.657

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Performance Fatigability: Mechanisms and Task Specificity.

Authors:  Sandra K Hunter
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 6.915

Review 2.  The Relevance of Sex Differences in Performance Fatigability.

Authors:  Sandra K Hunter
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 5.411

3.  Sex differences in human fatigability: mechanisms and insight to physiological responses.

Authors:  S K Hunter
Journal:  Acta Physiol (Oxf)       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 6.311

4.  Using a System-Based Monitoring Paradigm to Assess Fatigue during Submaximal Static Exercise of the Elbow Extensor Muscles.

Authors:  Kaci E Madden; Dragan Djurdjanovic; Ashish D Deshpande
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  Sex differences in muscle fatigue following isokinetic muscle contractions.

Authors:  Miguel Gomes; Paulo Santos; Paulo Correia; Pedro Pezarat-Correia; Goncalo V Mendonca
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Sex differences in fatigability of dynamic contractions.

Authors:  Sandra K Hunter
Journal:  Exp Physiol       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 2.969

7.  Cortical and spinal mechanisms of task failure of sustained submaximal fatiguing contractions.

Authors:  Petra S Williams; Richard L Hoffman; Brian C Clark
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.