Literature DB >> 15726238

Clinical and panoramic predictors of femur bone mineral density.

Stuart C White1, Akira Taguchi, David Kao, Sam Wu, Susan K Service, Douglas Yoon, Yoshikazu Suei, Takashi Nakamoto, Keiji Tanimoto.   

Abstract

Dentists are a potentially valuable resource for initial patient screening for signs of osteoporosis, as individuals with osteoporosis have altered architecture of the inferior border of the mandible as seen on panoramic radiographs. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy of combining clinical and dental panoramic radiographic risk factors for identifying individuals with low femoral bone mass. Bone mineral density was measured at the femoral neck and classified as normal, osteopenic or osteoporotic using WHO criteria in 227 Japanese postmenopausal women (33-84 years). Panoramic radiographs were made of all subjects. Mandibular cortical shape and width was determined and trabecular features were measured in each ramus. Mean subject age, height, and weight were significantly different in the three bone-density groups (P<0.0001). A classification and regression trees (CART) analysis using just clinical risk factors identified 136 (87%) of the 157 individuals with femoral osteopenia or osteoporosis. Mean mandible cortical width (P<0.0001), cortical index (P<0.0001) and trabecular features (P=0.02) were also significantly different in the three bone density groups. A CART analysis considering only radiographic features found 130 (83%) of the 157 individuals with femoral osteopenia or osteoporosis, although none of the subjects with osteoporosis was correctly identified. A CART analysis using both clinical and radiographic features found that the most useful risk factors were thickness of inferior border of the mandible and age. This algorithm identified 130 (83%) of the 157 individuals with femoral osteopenia or osteoporosis. The results of this study suggest that 1) clinical information is as useful as panoramic radiographic information for identifying subjects having low bone mass, and 2) dentists have sufficient clinical and radiographic information to play a useful role in screening for individuals with osteoporosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15726238     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-004-1692-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  38 in total

1.  Relationships between mandibular and skeletal bone in a population of normal women.

Authors:  P J Kribbs; C H Chesnut; S M Ott; R F Kilcoyne
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 3.426

2.  Assessment of cancellous bone structure: comparison of strut analysis, trabecular bone pattern factor, and marrow space star volume.

Authors:  P I Croucher; N J Garrahan; J E Compston
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  Usefulness of panoramic radiography in the diagnosis of postmenopausal osteoporosis in women. Width and morphology of inferior cortex of the mandible.

Authors:  A Taguchi; Y Suei; M Ohtsuka; K Otani; K Tanimoto; M Ohtaki
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 4.  Epidemiology of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  S R Cummings; J L Kelsey; M C Nevitt; K J O'Dowd
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 6.222

5.  Oral signs as indicators of possible osteoporosis in elderly women.

Authors:  A Taguchi; K Tanimoto; Y Suei; K Otani; T Wada
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  1995-11

6.  Pantomography in assessment of the osteoporosis risk group.

Authors:  E Klemetti; S Kolmakov; H Kröger
Journal:  Scand J Dent Res       Date:  1994-02

7.  Comparison of eight histomorphometric methods for measuring trabecular bone architecture by image analysis on histological sections.

Authors:  D Chappard; E Legrand; C Pascaretti; M F Baslé; M Audran
Journal:  Microsc Res Tech       Date:  1999 May 15-Jun 1       Impact factor: 2.769

8.  An assessment tool for predicting fracture risk in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  D M Black; M Steinbuch; L Palermo; P Dargent-Molina; R Lindsay; M S Hoseyni; O Johnell
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Relationships between mandibular and skeletal bone in an osteoporotic population.

Authors:  P J Kribbs; C H Chesnut; S M Ott; R F Kilcoyne
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 3.426

10.  Computerized radiographic analysis of osteoporosis: preliminary evaluation.

Authors:  P Caligiuri; M L Giger; M J Favus; H Jia; K Doi; L B Dixon
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  33 in total

1.  Diagnostic capabilities of fractal dimension and mandibular cortical width to identify men and women with decreased bone mineral density.

Authors:  A C Alman; L R Johnson; D C Calverley; G K Grunwald; D C Lezotte; J E Hokanson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  Detecting low bone mineral density from dental radiographs: a mini-review.

Authors:  James Graham
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2015-10-26

3.  Relationship between mandibular condyle and articular eminence cortication with mandibular cortical index on cone-beam CT.

Authors:  Eda Didem Yalcin; Cigdem Bozan
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 1.246

4.  Use of dental panoramic radiographs in identifying younger postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Authors:  Akira Taguchi; Mikio Tsuda; Masahiko Ohtsuka; Ichiro Kodama; Mitsuhiro Sanada; Takashi Nakamoto; Koji Inagaki; Toshihide Noguchi; Yoshiki Kudo; Yoshikazu Suei; Keiji Tanimoto; Anne-Marie Bollen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-12-06       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Computer-aided system for measuring the mandibular cortical width on dental panoramic radiographs in identifying postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density.

Authors:  A Z Arifin; A Asano; A Taguchi; T Nakamoto; M Ohtsuka; M Tsuda; Y Kudo; K Tanimoto
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-03-22       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  The impact of premature birth on the mandibular cortical bone of children.

Authors:  L Paulsson-Björnsson; J Adams; L Bondemark; H Devlin; K Horner; C Lindh
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Strut analysis for osteoporosis detection model using dental panoramic radiography.

Authors:  Jae Joon Hwang; Jeong-Hee Lee; Sang-Sun Han; Young Hyun Kim; Ho-Gul Jeong; Yoon Jeong Choi; Wonse Park
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 2.419

8.  Digital orthopantomograms in osteoporosis detection: mandibular density and mandibular radiographic indices as skeletal BMD predictors.

Authors:  I Savic Pavicin; J Dumancic; T Jukic; T Badel; A Badanjak
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 2.419

9.  Use of digital panoramic radiography as an auxiliary means of low bone mineral density detection in post-menopausal women.

Authors:  C S Valerio; A M Trindade; E T Mazzieiro; T P Amaral; F R Manzi
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 2.419

10.  Coincidence of calcified carotid atheromatous plaque, osteoporosis, and periodontal bone loss in dental panoramic radiographs.

Authors:  Aruna Ramesh; Sheila Soroushian; Rumpa Ganguly
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2013-12-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.