Literature DB >> 18804486

Viewpoint invariance in the discrimination of upright and inverted faces.

Alissa Wright1, Jason J S Barton.   

Abstract

Current models of face processing support an orientation-dependent expert face processing mechanism. However, even when upright, faces are encountered from different viewpoints, across which a face processing system must be able to generalize. Different computational models have generated competing predictions of how viewpoint variation might affect the perception of upright versus inverted faces. Our goal was to examine the interaction between viewpoint variation and orientation on face discrimination. Sixteen normal subjects performed an oddity paradigm requiring subjects to discriminate changes in three simultaneously viewed morphed faces presented either upright or inverted. In one type of trial all the faces were seen in frontal view; in the other all faces varied in viewpoint, rotated 45 degrees from each other. After the effects of orientation were adjusted for perceptual difficulty, there were only main effects of orientation and viewpoint, with no interaction between orientation and viewpoint. We conclude that the effects of viewpoint variation on the perceptual discrimination of faces is not different for upright versus inverted faces, indicating that its effects are independent of the expertise that exists for upright faces.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18804486      PMCID: PMC2643878          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.08.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  33 in total

1.  When inverted faces are recognized: the role of configural information in face recognition.

Authors:  H Leder; V Bruce
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2000-05

2.  Inversion leads to quantitative, not qualitative, changes in face processing.

Authors:  Allison B Sekuler; Carl M Gaspar; Jason M Gold; Patrick J Bennett
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-03-09       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  The effects of rotation and inversion on face processing in prosopagnosia.

Authors:  J J Marotta; T J McKeeff; M Behrmann
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Generalization to novel images in upright and inverted faces.

Authors:  Y Moses; S Ullman; S Edelman
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 1.490

5.  The effect of race, inversion and encoding activity upon face recognition.

Authors:  T Valentine; V Bruce
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1986-04

6.  Face recognition by brain-injured patients: a dissociable ability?

Authors:  R K Yin
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1970-11       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  What causes the face inversion effect?

Authors:  M J Farah; J W Tanaka; H M Drain
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Inversion and configuration of faces.

Authors:  J C Bartlett; J Searcy
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Face processing in humans is compatible with a simple shape-based model of vision.

Authors:  Maximilian Riesenhuber; Izzat Jarudi; Sharon Gilad; Pawan Sinha
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Super face-inversion effects for isolated internal or external features, and for fractured faces.

Authors:  M Moscovitch; D A Moscovitch
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2000-02-01       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.