Literature DB >> 8807518

Laparoscopic training in residency program.

A Hawasli1, R Featherstone, L Lloyd, M Vorhees.   

Abstract

The use of laparoscopy in general surgery has provided surgeons with a new approach to multiple procedures. New techniques are being developed daily. Laparoscopic training for surgical residents must be incorporated into their curriculum. To decrease the risks of training residents on patients and to decrease operative time, a program of videoscopic "bench" training exercises, to improve eye-hand coordination, was instituted for junior residents. Between July and September 1995, nine surgical residents participated in this proficiency videoscopic study. At the end of the study, there was a statistically significant improvement in the residents performance by an average of 37% (P = 0.0109). This program proved to be both effective and economical. It can be reproduced and easily incorporated into any surgical residency program.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8807518     DOI: 10.1089/lps.1996.6.171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laparoendosc Surg        ISSN: 1052-3901


  11 in total

1.  Evaluation of endoscopic and laparoscopic training practices in surgical residency programs.

Authors:  J M Marks; M S Nussbaum; T A Pritts; D E Scheeres
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-06-12       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Determinants of competency judgments by experienced laparoscopic surgeons.

Authors:  G L Adrales; M B Donnelly; U B Chu; D B Witzke; J D Hoskins; M J Mastrangelo; A Gandsas; A E Park
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-12-29       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  The impact of a resident's seniority on operative time and length of hospital stay for laparoscopic appendectomy: outcomes used to measure the resident's laparoscopic skills.

Authors:  M Shabtai; D Rosin; O Zmora; Y Munz; A Scarlat; E L Shabtai; B Bar Zakai; M Natour; M Ben-Haim; A Ayalon
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-06-23       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Construct validity of individual and summary performance metrics associated with a computer-based laparoscopic simulator.

Authors:  Justin D Rivard; Ashley S Vergis; Bertram J Unger; Krista M Hardy; Chris G Andrew; Lawrence M Gillman; Jason Park
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-01-18       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Methods of training using pelvic trainers.

Authors:  Ran Katz
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.862

6.  Laparoscopic and robotic surgical training in urology.

Authors:  András Hoznek; Ran Katz; Matthew Gettman; Laurent Salomon; Patrick Antiphon; Alexandre de la Taille; René Yiou; Dominique Chopin; Clément-Claude Abbou
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.862

7.  Implications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for surgical residency training.

Authors:  D Böckler; J Geoghegan; M Klein; Q Weissmann; M Turan; L Meyer; J Scheele
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  1999 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

8.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy conversion rates two decades later.

Authors:  Sujit Vijay Sakpal; Supreet Singh Bindra; Ronald S Chamberlain
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2010 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

9.  Face, content, and construct validity of a novel chicken model for laparoscopic ureteric reimplantation.

Authors:  Abhishek G Singh; Shrikant J Jai; Arvind P Ganpule; Mohankumar Vijayakumar; Ravindra B Sabnis; Mahesh R Desai
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep

Review 10.  Simulation-based training in laparoscopic urology - Pros and cons.

Authors:  Abhishek Gajendra Singh
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2018 Oct-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.