Literature DB >> 15803230

The impact of a resident's seniority on operative time and length of hospital stay for laparoscopic appendectomy: outcomes used to measure the resident's laparoscopic skills.

M Shabtai1, D Rosin, O Zmora, Y Munz, A Scarlat, E L Shabtai, B Bar Zakai, M Natour, M Ben-Haim, A Ayalon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) frequently is performed by residents during calls. This study aimed at evaluating residents' surgical skills using parameters of operating time, length of hospital stay (LOS), and conversion rate in correlation with the operating team's level of seniority. In addition, this study compared the operating time for LA with that for open appendectomy performed by the same teams, and identified deterministic factors that have an impact on such parameters.
METHODS: All records of patients undergoing appendectomy performed by residents alone during a 32-month period were reviewed retrospectively. Eight residents were assigned to two levels of seniority: juniors <or=3 years (J) and seniors >3 years (S). Operating time and LOS were compared between the three surgical teams, namely, J/J, J/S, and S/J as operating and assistant surgeons, respectively. Operating time, conversion rates, and LOS were compared for the same team combinations.
RESULTS: Residents alone performed 341 (151 laparoscopic and 190 open) appendectomies during on-call hours. Four of the residents had been 3 years or less in residency (J), and four had been in residency more than 3 years (S). The overall mean operating time was 1.33 +/- 0.48 h for LA and 1.2 +/- 0.5 h for open appendectomy (p = 0.016). The operating time correlated with the level of training for both LA (J/J, 1.6 +/- 0.38 h; J/S, 1.41 +/- 0.37 h; S/J, 1. 25 +/- 0.4 h; p = 0.03, ANOVA) and open appendectomy (J/J, 1.53 +/- 0.89 h; J/S, 1.4 +/- 0.63 h; S/J, 0.86 +/- 0.45 h; p = 0.023, ANOVA). The mean LOS was 2.9 +/- 3.1 days for open appendectomy and 2.1 +/- 2.8 days for LA (p = 0.065), and was not different after operation by any of the teams (J/J, J/S, S/J) for either the open or the laparoscopic procedure.
CONCLUSIONS: There is a distinct difference in the surgical skills of residents according to level of seniority, as primarily reflected by operating time. Laparoscopic appendectomy requires longer time to perform in a teaching setting, but the most deterministic factor that dictates operating time is the composition of the surgical team rather than the laparoscopic approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15803230     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-003-9216-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  18 in total

1.  Factors associated with conversion to laparotomy in patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy.

Authors:  Shiuh-Inn Liu; Bettina Siewert; Vassilios Raptopoulos; Richard A Hodin
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Moving from open to laparoscopic appendicectomy.

Authors:  K J Sweeney; F B V Keane
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Learning curves and impact of previous operative experience on performance on a virtual reality simulator to test laparoscopic surgical skills.

Authors:  Teodor P Grantcharov; Linda Bardram; Peter Funch-Jensen; Jacob Rosenberg
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 4.  Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis.

Authors:  S Sauerland; R Lefering; E A Neugebauer
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2002

5.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: results of a retrospective comparison in an Israeli hospital.

Authors:  Jochanan G Peiser; Dan Greenberg
Journal:  Isr Med Assoc J       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 0.892

6.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective comparative study of 227 patients.

Authors:  M Marzouk; M Khater; M Elsadek; A Abdelmoghny
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-03-06       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  The surgeon on call is a strong factor determining the use of a laparoscopic approach for appendectomy.

Authors:  P Cervini; L C Smith; D R Urbach
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-07-29       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: between evidence and common sense.

Authors:  Ernst Eypasch; Stefan Sauerland; Rolf Lefering; Edmund A M Neugebauer
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.588

9.  Minimally invasive techniques in common surgical procedures: implications for training.

Authors:  P H McCormick; W A Tanner; F B V Keane; S Tierney
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2003 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.568

10.  Role of diagnostic laparoscopy in managing acute mesenteric venous thrombosis.

Authors:  Yong Pil Cho; Seung Mun Jung; Myoung Sik Han; Hyuk Jai Jang; Jee Soo Kim; Yong Ho Kim; Sung Gyu Lee
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.719

View more
  9 in total

1.  Laparoscopic appendectomy as an index procedure for surgical trainees: clinical outcomes and learning curve.

Authors:  Alessandro Ussia; Samuele Vaccari; Gaetano Gallo; Ugo Grossi; Riccardo Ussia; Lodovico Sartarelli; Margherita Minghetti; Augusto Lauro; Paolo Barbieri; S Di Saverio; Maurizio Cervellera; Valeria Tonini
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-01-04

2.  Comparison of Appendectomy Outcomes Between Senior General Surgeons and General Surgery Residents.

Authors:  Baha Siam; Abbas Al-Kurd; Natalia Simanovsky; Haitham Awesat; Yahav Cohn; Brigitte Helou; Ahmed Eid; Haggi Mazeh
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 14.766

3.  Impact of Residency Training Level on the Surgical Quality Following General Surgery Procedures.

Authors:  Dominik Loiero; Maja Slankamenac; Pierre-Alain Clavien; Ksenija Slankamenac
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Laparoscopic appendectomy by residents: evaluating outcomes and learning curve.

Authors:  Yap Yan Lin; Asim Shabbir; Jimmy B Y So
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Patient and Procedural Factors That Influence Anesthetized, Nonoperative Time in Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Ross C Puffer; Grant W Mallory; Anthony M Burrows; Timothy B Curry; Michelle J Clarke
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2015-09-29

6.  Feasibility and Safety of Laparoscopic Appendectomy Performed by Residents with No Experience in Open Appendectomy.

Authors:  Ryusei Yamamoto; Yasuji Mokuno; Hideo Matsubara; Hirokazu Kaneko; Shinsuke Iyomasa
Journal:  JMA J       Date:  2019-02-01

7.  Feasibility of safe laparoscopic surgery performed by junior residents without exposure of open appendectomy: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Satya Prakash Meena; Mayank Badkur; Mahaveer S Rodha; Mahendra Lodha; Ashok Puranik; Krashan Kant Premi
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2022-02-16

8.  Laparoscopic appendectomy performed by residents and experienced surgeons.

Authors:  Lapo Bencini; Marco Bernini; Francesco Martini; Michele Rossi; Cinzia Tommasi; Egidio Miranda; Luis Josè Sanchez; Riccardo Naspetti; Roberto Manetti; Angelo Ferrara; Silvia Nesi; Bernardo Boffi; Marco Farsi; Renato Moretti
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2009 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

9.  Learning curve after rapid introduction of laparoscopic appendectomy: are there any risks in surgical resident participation?

Authors:  Eszter Mán; Tibor Németh; Tibor Géczi; Zsolt Simonka; György Lázár
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 5.469

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.