Literature DB >> 12648430

Laparoscopic and robotic surgical training in urology.

András Hoznek1, Ran Katz, Matthew Gettman, Laurent Salomon, Patrick Antiphon, Alexandre de la Taille, René Yiou, Dominique Chopin, Clément-Claude Abbou.   

Abstract

The most important change in urology during the past decade was the development of minimally invasive surgery, particularly laparoscopy. However, the main drawback of laparoscopy is a steep learning curve, which results from the significant changes in the surgical environment. Although laparoscopy can provide important advantages for the patient, including decreased length of hospitalization, decreased analgesic requirement, and a shortened postoperative convalescence, one concern has been whether laparoscopic techniques should be learned solely in the operating room. For example, sports, music, and aviation are practiced before an actual performance is ever undertaken. In this review, the advantages and limitations of all available training modalities in minimally invasive surgery are described. Testing basic laparoscopic skills on inanimate models, becoming familiar with the principles of dissection and hemostasis on living animals, and studying surgical anatomy on cadavers should be considered as indispensable and complementary elements for laparoscopic training in the future. In addition, telementoring with the help of modern image processing and virtual reality eventually may become the basis of tomorrow's surgical instruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12648430     DOI: 10.1007/s11934-003-0040-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Urol Rep        ISSN: 1527-2737            Impact factor:   2.862


  49 in total

1.  3-D vision improves performance in a pelvic trainer.

Authors:  H T Tevaearai; X M Mueller; L K von Segesser
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 10.093

2.  A laparoscopic surgical training and accreditation program up and running.

Authors:  D Munday; J Kerin
Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.100

3.  Training postgraduate urologists in laparoscopic surgery: the current challenge.

Authors:  Arieh L Shalhav; Mark D Dabagia; Theodore T Wagner; Michael O Koch; James E Lingeman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Laparoscopic and robot assisted radical prostatectomy: establishment of a structured program and preliminary analysis of outcomes.

Authors:  Mani Menon; Alok Shrivastava; Ashutosh Tewari; Richard Sarle; Ashok Hemal; James O Peabody; Guy Vallancien
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic skills: is there a difference in the learning curve?

Authors:  Paulos Yohannes; Paul Rotariu; Peter Pinto; Arthur D Smith; Benjamin R Lee
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  A method of objectively evaluating improvements in laparoscopic skills.

Authors:  J Y Chung; J M Sackier
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Immersive virtual reality used as a platform for perioperative training for surgical residents.

Authors:  D B Witzke; J D Hoskins; M J Mastrangelo; W O Witzke; U B Chu; S Pande; A E Park
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2001

8.  Telerobotic assisted laparoscopic surgery: initial laboratory and clinical experience.

Authors:  L R Kavoussi; R G Moore; A W Partin; J S Bender; M E Zenilman; R M Satava
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Laparoscopic practice patterns among North American urologists 5 years after formal training.

Authors:  P M Colegrove; H N Winfield; J F Donovan; W A See
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Formidable challenges to teaching advanced laparoscopic skills.

Authors:  M Medina
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2001 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

View more
  8 in total

1.  Major urological oncological surgeries can be performed using minimally invasive robotic or laparoscopic methods with similar early perioperative outcomes compared to conventional open methods.

Authors:  Samuel Sterrett; Tony Mammen; Tanya Nazemi; Anton Galich; Gregory Peters; Lynette Smith; K C Balaji
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Surgical skills training in the laparoscopic era: the use of a helping hand.

Authors:  R M Nataraja; N Ade-Ajayi; J I Curry
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2006-09-19       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 3.  Training for MIS in pediatric urology: proposition of a structured training curriculum.

Authors:  Maria Escolino; Francesco Turrà; Alessandro Settimi; Ciro Esposito
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2016-10

4.  Cryosurgery, an alternative treatment option for organ-confined prostate cancer: current beliefs and practice patterns of urologists.

Authors:  Michael Kongnyuy; Daniel M Halpern; Kaitlin E Kosinski; Aaron E Katz
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 2.370

5.  The role of percutaneous endopyelotomy for ureteropelvic junction obstruction.

Authors:  N J Rukin; D A Ashdown; P Patel; S Liu
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  A warm-up laparoscopic exercise improves the subsequent laparoscopic performance of Ob-Gyn residents: a low-cost laparoscopic trainer.

Authors:  Ann T Do; Michael F Cabbad; Angela Kerr; Eli Serur; Robert R Robertazzi; Miljan R Stankovic
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2006 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

Review 7.  Methods for laparoscopic training using animal models.

Authors:  Roland F van Velthoven; Paul Hoffmann
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.862

8.  Coordinated multiple cadaver use for minimally invasive surgical training.

Authors:  Sarah D Blaschko; H Mark Brooks; S Michael Dhuy; Cynthia Charest-Shell; Ralph V Clayman; Elspeth M McDougall
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2007 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.