Literature DB >> 16526993

Methods of training using pelvic trainers.

Ran Katz1.   

Abstract

During the past decade, the clinical applications of laparoscopic surgery in urology have been growing steadily. The laparoscopic version of various procedures, such as nephrectomy, is becoming the standard of care. This has led to an increased need for laparoscopic training in urology and focused the attention on the various modalities for laparoscopic skill acquisition. The common training modalities for laparoscopy are box trainers, animal and cadaveric laparoscopy, and virtual reality simulators. Each modality carries its own benefits to the practicing surgeon. The box trainers are the first practiced and are basic training simulators. They were first designed to help with training in basic laparoscopic skills and to assist surgeons in getting acquainted with instruments. However, these simple boxes are being upgraded constantly by tissue- and organ-specific models, allowing the surgeon to train in a convenient and cost-effective environment. This article describes the ways to work with box trainers, from basic skills to advanced laparoscopic tasks, and discusses the contribution of these trainers to real surgery as well as their role in defining criterion levels of surgical performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16526993     DOI: 10.1007/s11934-006-0067-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Urol Rep        ISSN: 1527-2737            Impact factor:   2.862


  38 in total

1.  3-D vision improves performance in a pelvic trainer.

Authors:  H T Tevaearai; X M Mueller; L K von Segesser
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 10.093

2.  Vesicourethral anastomosis during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the running suture method.

Authors:  A Hoznek; L Salomon; R Rabii; M R Ben Slama; A Cicco; P Antiphon; C C Abbou
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.942

3.  Skill assessment of urological laparoscopic surgeons: can criterion levels of surgical performance be determined using the pelvic box trainer?

Authors:  Ran Katz; Andras Hoznek; Laurent Salomon; Patrick Antiphon; Alexandre de la Taille; Claude Clement Abbou
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2005-01-01       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Multicenter construct validity for southwestern laparoscopic videotrainer stations.

Authors:  James R Korndorffer; John L Clayton; Seifu T Tesfay; William C Brunner; Rafael Sierra; J Bruce Dunne; Daniel B Jones; Robert V Rege; Cheri L Touchard; Daniel J Scott
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.192

5.  Survey from skills-based hands on learning courses demonstrates increased laparoscopic caseload and clinical laparoscopic suturing.

Authors:  Gyan Pareek; Sean P Hedican; Jay T Bishoff; Steven J Shichman; J Stuart Wolf; Stephen Y Nakada
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  How to build your own laparoscopic trainer.

Authors:  Anthony J R Blacker
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.942

7.  The Heilbronn laparoscopic training program for laparoscopic suturing: concept and validation.

Authors:  Dogu Teber; Yoram Dekel; Thomas Frede; Jan Klein; Jens Rassweiler
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.942

8.  A method of objectively evaluating improvements in laparoscopic skills.

Authors:  J Y Chung; J M Sackier
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Evaluating surgical competency with the American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination, skill testing, and intraoperative assessment.

Authors:  D J Scott; R J Valentine; P C Bergen; R V Rege; R Laycock; S T Tesfay; D B Jones
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.982

10.  Training and assessment of laparoscopic skills.

Authors:  Jeremy L Emken; Elspeth M Mcdougall; Ralph V Clayman
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2004 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

View more
  6 in total

1.  Gynaecological laparoscopy courses in the United Arab Emirates.

Authors:  H M Elbiss; S George; I Sidky; F M Abu-Zidan
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 0.927

2.  Virtual reality does not meet expectations in a pilot study on multimodal laparoscopic surgery training.

Authors:  Felix Nickel; Vasile V Bintintan; Tobias Gehrig; Hannes G Kenngott; Lars Fischer; Carsten N Gutt; Beat P Müller-Stich
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Evaluation of the laparoscopic component of GESEA Programme in two different groups: Obstetrics and Gynaecology Residents versus Participants in the Annual GESEA Diploma Course in Clermont Ferrand, France.

Authors:  B Bustos; R Avilés; S Paracchini; B Pereira; R Botchorishvili; B Rabischong
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2020-08-05

4.  [Preparation for clinical introduction of advanced laparoscopic procedures: laparoscopic renal autotransplantation].

Authors:  O Reichelt; A Borkowetz; A Chyhrai; E Tanovic; T Weirich; T Müller; H Schubert; J Schubert
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Are you good enough for your patients? The European certification model in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  R Campo; C R Molinas; R L De Wilde; H Brolmann; S Brucker; L Mencaglia; P Odonovan; D Wallwiener; A Wattiez
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2012

6.  Implementation of minimal invasive gynaecological surgery certification will challenge gynaecologists with new legal and ethical issues.

Authors:  V Tanos; R Socolov; P Demetriou; M Kyprianou; A Watrelot; Y Van Belle; R Campo
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2016-06-27
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.