Literature DB >> 11238409

Whole-genome effects of ethyl methanesulfonate-induced mutation on nine quantitative traits in outbred Drosophila melanogaster.

H P Yang1, A Y Tanikawa, W A Van Voorhies, J C Silva, A S Kondrashov.   

Abstract

We induced mutations in Drosophila melanogaster males by treating them with 21.2 mm ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS). Nine quantitative traits (developmental time, viability, fecundity, longevity, metabolic rate, motility, body weight, and abdominal and sternopleural bristle numbers) were measured in outbred heterozygous F3 (viability) or F2 (all other traits) offspring from the treated males. The mean values of the first four traits, which are all directly related to the life history, were substantially affected by EMS mutagenesis: the developmental time increased while viability, fecundity, and longevity declined. In contrast, the mean values of the other five traits were not significantly affected. Rates of recessive X-linked lethals and of recessive mutations at several loci affecting eye color imply that our EMS treatment was equivalent to approximately 100 generations of spontaneous mutation. If so, our data imply that one generation of spontaneous mutation increases the developmental time by 0.09% at 20 degrees and by 0.04% at 25 degrees, and reduces viability under harsh conditions, fecundity, and longevity by 1.35, 0.21, and 0.08%, respectively. Comparison of flies with none, one, and two grandfathers (or greatgrandfathers, in the case of viability) treated with EMS did not reveal any significant epistasis among the induced mutations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11238409      PMCID: PMC1461548     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  22 in total

1.  Comparing evolvability and variability of quantitative traits.

Authors:  D Houle
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Heterozygous effects on fitness of EMS-treated chromosomes in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  M J Simmons; E W Sheldon; J F Crow
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  Comparing mutational variabilities.

Authors:  D Houle; B Morikawa; M Lynch
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 4.  Properties of spontaneous mutations affecting quantitative traits.

Authors:  A García-Dorado; C López-Fanjul; A Caballero
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.588

5.  Fitness effects of EMS-induced mutations on the X chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster. I. Viability effects and heterozygous fitness effects.

Authors:  J A Mitchell
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Mutation rate and dominance of genes affecting viability in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  T Mukai; S I Chigusa; L E Mettler; J F Crow
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1972-10       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Viability mutations induced by ethyl methanesulfonate in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  T Mukai
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1970-06       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Genotype-environment interactions and the estimation of the genomic mutation rate in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  A S Kondrashov; D Houle
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1994-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Mutational specificity of ethyl methanesulfonate in excision-repair-proficient and -deficient strains of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  A Pastink; E Heemskerk; M J Nivard; C J van Vliet; E W Vogel
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1991-10

10.  Molecular characterization of spontaneous mutations at the scarlet locus of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  J F ten Have; M M Green; A J Howells
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1995-12-20
View more
  12 in total

1.  Estimating mutation rate: how to count mutations?

Authors:  Yun-Xin Fu; Haying Huai
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  Measurements of spontaneous rates of mutations in the recent past and the near future.

Authors:  Fyodor A Kondrashov; Alexey S Kondrashov
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Interactions between stressful environment and gene deletions alleviate the expected average loss of fitness in yeast.

Authors:  Lukasz Jasnos; Katarzyna Tomala; Dorota Paczesniak; Ryszard Korona
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Dietary stress does not strengthen selection against single deleterious mutations in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  K MacLellan; L Kwan; M C Whitlock; H D Rundle
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 3.821

5.  Populations with elevated mutation load do not benefit from the operation of sexual selection.

Authors:  B Hollis; D Houle
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 2.411

6.  Epistatic interactions among herbicide resistances in Arabidopsis thaliana: the fitness cost of multiresistance.

Authors:  Fabrice Roux; Christine Camilleri; Sandra Giancola; Dominique Brunel; Xavier Reboud
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-07-14       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 7.  Using phenotypic plasticity to understand the structure and evolution of the genotype-phenotype map.

Authors:  Luis-Miguel Chevin; Christelle Leung; Arnaud Le Rouzic; Tobias Uller
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 1.633

8.  Direct estimate of the mutation rate and the distribution of fitness effects in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  D M Wloch; K Szafraniec; R H Borts; R Korona
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Spontaneous mutational variation for body size in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Ricardo B R Azevedo; Peter D Keightley; Camilla Laurén-Määttä; Larissa L Vassilieva; Michael Lynch; Armand M Leroi
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Contrasting properties of gene-specific regulatory, coding, and copy number mutations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: frequency, effects, and dominance.

Authors:  Jonathan D Gruber; Kara Vogel; Gizem Kalay; Patricia J Wittkopp
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.