Literature DB >> 24219635

Genetic regulatory network motifs constrain adaptation through curvature in the landscape of mutational (co)variance.

Tyler D Hether1, Paul A Hohenlohe.   

Abstract

Systems biology is accumulating a wealth of understanding about the structure of genetic regulatory networks, leading to a more complete picture of the complex genotype-phenotype relationship. However, models of multivariate phenotypic evolution based on quantitative genetics have largely not incorporated a network-based view of genetic variation. Here we model a set of two-node, two-phenotype genetic network motifs, covering a full range of regulatory interactions. We find that network interactions result in different patterns of mutational (co)variance at the phenotypic level (the M-matrix), not only across network motifs but also across phenotypic space within single motifs. This effect is due almost entirely to mutational input of additive genetic (co)variance. Variation in M has the effect of stretching and bending phenotypic space with respect to evolvability, analogous to the curvature of space-time under general relativity, and similar mathematical tools may apply in each case. We explored the consequences of curvature in mutational variation by simulating adaptation under divergent selection with gene flow. Both standing genetic variation (the G-matrix) and rate of adaptation are constrained by M, so that G and adaptive trajectories are curved across phenotypic space. Under weak selection the phenotypic mean at migration-selection balance also depends on M.
© 2013 The Author(s). Evolution © 2013 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Divergence with gene flow; G-matrix; M-matrix; evolutionary systems biology; evolvability; quantitative genetics

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24219635      PMCID: PMC3975670          DOI: 10.1111/evo.12313

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  52 in total

1.  Stability of the G-matrix in a population experiencing pleiotropic mutation, stabilizing selection, and genetic drift.

Authors:  Adam G Jones; Stevan J Arnold; Reinhard Bürger
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  An ecologist's guide to the animal model.

Authors:  Alastair J Wilson; Denis Réale; Michelle N Clements; Michael M Morrissey; Erik Postma; Craig A Walling; Loeske E B Kruuk; Daniel H Nussey
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.091

3.  Patterns of quantitative genetic variation in multiple dimensions.

Authors:  Mark Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2008-08-10       Impact factor: 1.082

4.  From genotype to phenotype: systems biology meets natural variation.

Authors:  Philip N Benfey; Thomas Mitchell-Olds
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-04-25       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Common SNPs explain a large proportion of the heritability for human height.

Authors:  Jian Yang; Beben Benyamin; Brian P McEvoy; Scott Gordon; Anjali K Henders; Dale R Nyholt; Pamela A Madden; Andrew C Heath; Nicholas G Martin; Grant W Montgomery; Michael E Goddard; Peter M Visscher
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2010-06-20       Impact factor: 38.330

6.  The mutation matrix and the evolution of evolvability.

Authors:  Adam G Jones; Stevan J Arnold; Reinhard Bürger
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Negative feedback confers mutational robustness in yeast transcription factor regulation.

Authors:  Charles M Denby; Joo Hyun Im; Richard C Yu; C Gustavo Pesce; Rachel B Brem
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Epistasis--the essential role of gene interactions in the structure and evolution of genetic systems.

Authors:  Patrick C Phillips
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 53.242

9.  Hierarchical cluster-based partial least squares regression (HC-PLSR) is an efficient tool for metamodelling of nonlinear dynamic models.

Authors:  Kristin Tøndel; Ulf G Indahl; Arne B Gjuvsland; Jon Olav Vik; Peter Hunter; Stig W Omholt; Harald Martens
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2011-06-01

10.  Adaptation by introgression.

Authors:  Michael L Arnold; Noland H Martin
Journal:  J Biol       Date:  2009-10-13
View more
  1 in total

1.  A broad mutational target explains a fast rate of phenotypic evolution.

Authors:  Fabrice Besnard; Joao Picao-Osorio; Clément Dubois; Marie-Anne Félix
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 8.140

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.