Literature DB >> 2040457

Mixed model analysis of a selection experiment for food intake in mice.

K Meyer1, W G Hill.   

Abstract

Data from 23 generations of mice selected for increased and reduced appetite were analysed by Restricted Maximum Likelihood fitting an animal model with litters as additional random effects. Traits considered were food intake between 4 and 6 weeks of age adjusted for 4-week body weight (AFI), the selection criterion, and body weight at 6 weeks (6WW). Selection was carried out within families. A high and a low selection line and a control were maintained in each of three replicates. Analyses were performed for each replicate separately taking subsets of the data spanning different numbers of generations. Overall estimates of heritabilities were 0.15 for AFI, which agreed well with realized heritability estimates, and 0.42 for 6WW. The litter variance, expressed as a proportion of the phenotypic variance, was 0.21 for both traits, yielding intraclass correlations of full-sibs of 0.29 and 0.42, respectively. Similar results were obtained for variances of each trait using univariate and multivariate analyses. From the latter, estimates of correlations between the two traits were 0.46 for additive genetic, -0.19 for litter and 0.31 for residual effects, resulting in a phenotypic correlation of 0.23. Analyses of data from generations 2-7, 8-13 and 14-23 separately showed a marked decrease in genetic variance and heritability in later generations for both traits. Heritabilities of AFI, for instance, were 0.24, 0.10 and 0.07, respectively. These changes could not be attributed to the effects of inbreeding or of selection in an infinitesimal model and suggested that some change in variance due to change in gene frequency had occurred during the course of the experiment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2040457     DOI: 10.1017/s0016672300029062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Res        ISSN: 0016-6723            Impact factor:   1.588


  9 in total

1.  Evolution of the additive genetic variance-covariance matrix under continuous directional selection on a complex behavioural phenotype.

Authors:  Vincent Careau; Matthew E Wolak; Patrick A Carter; Theodore Garland
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Quantitative genetic variation in body size of mice from new mutations.

Authors:  P D Keightley; W G Hill
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Characterizing the evolution of genetic variance using genetic covariance tensors.

Authors:  Emma Hine; Stephen F Chenoweth; Howard D Rundle; Mark W Blows
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  Developments in statistical analysis in quantitative genetics.

Authors:  Daniel Sorensen
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 1.082

Review 5.  Comparing mutational variabilities.

Authors:  D Houle; B Morikawa; M Lynch
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Genetic and statistical analyses of strong selection on polygenic traits: what, me normal?

Authors:  M Turelli; N H Barton
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Natural selection stops the evolution of male attractiveness.

Authors:  Emma Hine; Katrina McGuigan; Mark W Blows
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-02-14       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Divergent selection for natural antibodies in poultry in the presence of a major gene.

Authors:  Henk Bovenhuis; Tom V L Berghof; Marleen H P W Visker; Joop A J Arts; Jeroen Visscher; Jan J van der Poel; Henk K Parmentier
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 4.297

9.  Understanding and using quantitative genetic variation.

Authors:  William G Hill
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 6.237

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.