Literature DB >> 8803746

Impact of an interactive video on decision making of patients with ischemic heart disease.

L Liao1, J G Jollis, E R DeLong, E D Peterson, K G Morris, D B Mark.   

Abstract

An experimental pilot study using repeated measures to examine the impact of an interactive video program on the decision making of patients with ischemic heart disease was carried on at a tertiary care center and a Veterans Affairs hospital. The patients (n = 80, mean age 61.1 years, 77% male, 75% white, 26.7% with acute myocardial infarction), who had undergone diagnostic cardiac catheterization and were found to have significant coronary artery disease (> or = 75% stenosis in at least one vessel), watched the Shared Decision-Making Program (SDP) for Ischemic Heart Disease (IHD), a novel interactive video system designed to provide information necessary for patients to participate actively in decision making. This program compares medical therapy, angioplasty, and bypass surgery through a physician narrator, patient testimonials, and empirically-based, patient-specific outcome estimates of short-time complications and long-term survival. Before and after viewing the SDP, patients completed surveys containing multiple choice questions and Likert scales. They rated the program as more helpful than all other decision aids except the physician, and after viewing the SDP they expressed increased confidence in their treatment choice and decreased confidence in alternative options (p = .0001). The greatest effects appeared to be concentrated in those patients with less education (p = .04), and the program appeared to increase anxiety in nonwhite patients compared with white patients (p = 0.07).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8803746     DOI: 10.1007/bf02600051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  18 in total

1.  Adult open heart surgery in New York State. An analysis of risk factors and hospital mortality rates.

Authors:  E L Hannan; H Kilburn; J F O'Donnell; G Lukacik; E P Shields
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-12-05       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Measuring patients' desire for autonomy: decision making and information-seeking preferences among medical patients.

Authors:  J Ende; L Kazis; A Ash; M A Moskowitz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1989 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Multivariate prediction of in-hospital mortality associated with coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group.

Authors:  G T O'Connor; S K Plume; E M Olmstead; L H Coffin; J R Morton; C T Maloney; E R Nowicki; D G Levy; J F Tryzelaar; F Hernandez
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Coronary arteriography and coronary bypass survey among whites and other racial groups relative to hospital-based incidence rates for coronary artery disease: findings from NHDS.

Authors:  E Ford; R Cooper; A Castaner; B Simmons; M Mar
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  The evolution of medical and surgical therapy for coronary artery disease. A 15-year perspective.

Authors:  R M Califf; F E Harrell; K L Lee; J S Rankin; M A Hlatky; D B Mark; R H Jones; L H Muhlbaier; H N Oldham; D B Pryor
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1989-04-14       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Circumcision and informed consent. Is more information always better?

Authors:  J J Christensen-Szalanski; W T Boyce; H Harrell; M M Gardner
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Continuing evolution of therapy for coronary artery disease. Initial results from the era of coronary angioplasty.

Authors:  D B Mark; C L Nelson; R M Califf; F E Harrell; K L Lee; R H Jones; D F Fortin; R S Stack; D D Glower; L R Smith
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 8.  Physicians in health care management: 8. The patient-physician partnership: decision making, problem solving and the desire to participate.

Authors:  R B Deber
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1994-08-15       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Decision making during serious illness: what role do patients really want to play?

Authors:  L F Degner; J A Sloan
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 6.437

10.  Racial inequalities in the use of procedures for patients with ischemic heart disease in Massachusetts.

Authors:  M B Wenneker; A M Epstein
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1989-01-13       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Understanding risk and lessons for clinical risk communication about treatment preferences.

Authors:  A Edwards; G Elwyn
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2001-09

2.  Perceptions of benefit and risk of patients undergoing first-time elective percutaneous coronary revascularization.

Authors:  E S Holmboe; D A Fiellin; E Cusanelli; M Remetz; H M Krumholz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Shared decision making in the real world.

Authors:  R B Deber
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Improving health care by understanding patient preferences: the role of computer technology.

Authors:  P F Brennan; I Strombom
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1998 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  The risks of multimedia methods: effects of actor's race and gender on preferences for health states.

Authors:  L A Lenert; J Ziegler; T Lee; C Unfred; R Mahmoud
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 6.  Computer-based approaches to patient education: a review of the literature.

Authors:  D Lewis
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  Modeling emotion and behavior in animated personas to facilitate human behavior change: the case of the HEART-SENSE game.

Authors:  B G Silverman; J Holmes; S Kimmel; C Branas; D Ivins; R Weaver; Y Chen
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2001-09

Review 8.  A systematic review of information in decision aids.

Authors:  Deb Feldman-Stewart; Sarah Brennenstuhl; Kathryn McIssac; Joan Austoker; Agathe Charvet; Paul Hewitson; Karen R Sepucha; Tim Whelan
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 9.  Personalised risk communication for informed decision making about taking screening tests.

Authors:  Adrian G K Edwards; Gurudutt Naik; Harry Ahmed; Glyn J Elwyn; Timothy Pickles; Kerry Hood; Rebecca Playle
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-02-28

10.  Development and preliminary evaluation of a clinical guidance programme for the decision about prophylactic oophorectomy in women undergoing a hysterectomy.

Authors:  I Pell; J Dowie; A Clarke; A Kennedy; V Bhavnani
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2002-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.