Literature DB >> 9609495

Improving health care by understanding patient preferences: the role of computer technology.

P F Brennan1, I Strombom.   

Abstract

If nurses, physicians, and health care planners knew more about patients' health-related preferences, care would most likely be cheaper, more effective, and closer to the individuals' desires. In order for patient preferences to be effectively used in the delivery of health care, it is important that patients be able to formulate and express preferences, that these judgments be made known to the clinician at the time of care, and that these statements meaningfully inform care activities. Decision theory and health informatics offer promising strategies for eliciting subjective values and making them accessible in a clinical encounter in a manner that drives health choices. Computer-based elicitation and reporting tools are proving acceptable to patients and clinicians alike. It is time for the informatics community to turn their attention toward building computer-based applications that support clinicians in the complex cognitive process of integrating patient preferences with scientific knowledge, clinical practice guidelines, and the realities of contemporary health care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9609495      PMCID: PMC61299          DOI: 10.1136/jamia.1998.0050257

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  19 in total

1.  Developing and testing a multimedia presentation of a health-state description.

Authors:  M K Goldstein; A E Clarke; D Michelson; A M Garber; M R Bergen; L A Lenert
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1994 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.583

2.  Women's and men's preferences for cardiac rehabilitation program features.

Authors:  S M Moore; F M Kramer
Journal:  J Cardiopulm Rehabil       Date:  1996 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.081

3.  What role do patients wish to play in treatment decision making?

Authors:  R B Deber; N Kraetschmer; J Irvine
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1996-07-08

4.  Patient reactions to a program designed to facilitate patient participation in treatment decisions for benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  M J Barry; F J Fowler; A G Mulley; J V Henderson; J E Wennberg
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Patient practice variation. A call for research.

Authors:  D R Longo
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Developing shared decision-making programs to improve the quality of health care.

Authors:  J F Kasper; A G Mulley; J E Wennberg
Journal:  QRB Qual Rev Bull       Date:  1992-06

7.  The use and impact of a computer-based support system for people living with AIDS and HIV infection.

Authors:  D H Gustafson; R P Hawkins; E W Boberg; E Bricker; S Pingree; C L Chan
Journal:  Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care       Date:  1994

8.  A comparison of problem lists generated by physicians, nurses, and patients: implications for CPR systems.

Authors:  S B Henry; W L Holzemer
Journal:  Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care       Date:  1995

9.  Using a pen-based computer to collect health-related quality of life and utilities information.

Authors:  P P Le; I S Kohane; J C Weeks
Journal:  Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care       Date:  1995

10.  Patient use of a computer for prevention in primary care practice.

Authors:  R B Williams; M Boles; R E Johnson
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  1995-07
View more
  52 in total

Review 1.  Consumer health informatics.

Authors:  G Eysenbach
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-06-24

2.  A proposed ontology for online healthcare surveys.

Authors:  Syed Z Huq; Bryant T Karras
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2003

Review 3.  Current Science on Consumer Use of Mobile Health for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Lora E Burke; Jun Ma; Kristen M J Azar; Gary G Bennett; Eric D Peterson; Yaguang Zheng; William Riley; Janna Stephens; Svati H Shah; Brian Suffoletto; Tanya N Turan; Bonnie Spring; Julia Steinberger; Charlene C Quinn
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Electronic feedback messages for home spirometry lung transplant recipients.

Authors:  Sarah J Pangarakis; Kathleen Harrington; Ruth Lindquist; Cynthia Peden-McAlpine; Stanley Finkelstein
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.210

5.  Why should regulators consider using patient preferences in benefit-risk assessment?

Authors:  Janine A van Til; Maarten J Ijzerman
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Knowing what to do: international perspectives on the roles of clinical guidelines and patient preferences in patient care.

Authors:  P F Brennan
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1998 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  Leveraging electronic tablets for general pediatric care: a pilot study.

Authors:  V Anand; S McKee; T M Dugan; S M Downs
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 2.342

8.  Perceptions and preferences for long-acting injectable and implantable medications in comparison to short-acting medications for opioid use disorders.

Authors:  Elizabeth C Saunders; Sarah K Moore; Olivia Walsh; Stephen A Metcalf; Alan J Budney; Emily Scherer; Lisa A Marsch
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2020-01-21

9.  Patients' preferences for osteoarthritis treatment: the value of stated-preference studies.

Authors:  Mickael Hiligsmann; Daniel Pinto; Elaine Dennison; Nasser Al-Daghri; Charlotte Beaudart; Jaime Branco; Olivier Bruyère; Philip G Conaghan; Cyrus Cooper; Gabriel Herrero-Beaumont; Famida Jiwa; Willem Lems; Rene Rizzoli; Thierry Thomas; Nicola Veronese; Jean-Yves Reginster
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 3.636

10.  How to integrate individual patient values and preferences in clinical practice guidelines? A research protocol.

Authors:  Trudy van der Weijden; France Légaré; Antoine Boivin; Jako S Burgers; Haske van Veenendaal; Anne M Stiggelbout; Marjan Faber; Glyn Elwyn
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2010-02-02       Impact factor: 7.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.