Literature DB >> 18594994

Differences in precision in bone mineral density measured by SXA and DXA: the NOREPOS study.

Lisa Forsén1, Gro K Rosvold Berntsen, Haakon E Meyer, Grethe S Tell, Vinjar Fønnebø.   

Abstract

The aims were to compare the precision (reliability) in single X-ray (SXA) and dual X-ray (DXA) absorptiometry, and to compare smallest detectable difference (SDD). An additional aim was to examine determinants for precision in bone mineral density (BMD). BMD was measured by SXA (DTX-100, Osteometer) in the forearm and by DXA (Lunar Expert) in the forearm and in the hip. Two measurements were performed at each site/method, and 195 of 207 participants had complete datasets. Participants were aged 47-49 and 71-74 years. The precision was estimated by Root Mean Square Standard Deviation (RMS SD) with 95% Confidence Interval (95%CI) and the corresponding coefficients of variation (CV%). Determinants (age, gender, BMD) were analysed by multiple linear regression with log (SD) and log (CV) as dependent variables. RMS SD tended to be largest in older women and in those with low BMD. RMS SD for SXA and DXA forearm was 4.6 (4.2-5.1) and 6.8 (6.1-7.4) and the corresponding CVs 1.0% and 1.4%. RMS SD for DXA hip was 11.0 (9.9-12.0) with CV 1.2%. To detect a 3% change in BMD one would need two repeated measurements by DXA in the distal forearm at each of two consultations, but only one measurement by SXA in the distal forearm and also only one measurement by DXA in the hip. Precision differed by type of densitometer affecting the number of repeated measurements needed to detect a given BMD difference.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18594994     DOI: 10.1007/s10654-008-9271-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0393-2990            Impact factor:   8.082


  32 in total

1.  Precision of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in determining bone mineral density and content of various skeletal sites.

Authors:  H Sievänen; P Oja; I Vuori
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry of the forearm: reproducibility and correlation with single-photon absorptiometry.

Authors:  M S Leboff; G E Fuleihan; J E Angell; S Chung; K Curtis
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry of the forearm in preterm and term infants: evaluation of the methodology.

Authors:  H Sievänen; M C Backström; A L Kuusela; R S Ikonen; M Mäki
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.756

4.  What is the influence of weight change on forearm bone mineral density in peri- and postmenopausal women? The health study of Nord-Trondelag, Norway.

Authors:  Siri Forsmo; Jørn Aaen; Berit Schei; Arnulf Langhammer
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2006-08-03       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Quality control of DXA instruments in multicenter trials.

Authors:  K G Faulkner; M R McClung
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Quality assurance for bone densitometry research studies: concept and impact.

Authors:  C C Glüer; K G Faulkner; M J Estilo; K Engelke; J Rosin; H K Genant
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Higher bone mineral density in rural compared with urban dwellers: the NOREPOS study.

Authors:  H E Meyer; G K R Berntsen; A J Søgaard; A Langhammer; B Schei; V Fønnebø; S Forsmo; G S Tell
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2004-12-01       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Evaluation of peripheral dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: comparison with single photon absorptiometry of the forearm and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of the spine or femur.

Authors:  P A Mole; M E McMurdo; C R Paterson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  D Marshall; O Johnell; H Wedel
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-05-18

Review 10.  Precision assessment and radiation safety for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: position paper of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.

Authors:  Sanford Baim; Charles R Wilson; E Michael Lewiecki; Marjorie M Luckey; Robert W Downs; Brian C Lentle
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.963

View more
  11 in total

1.  The Shanghai Changfeng Study: a community-based prospective cohort study of chronic diseases among middle-aged and elderly: objectives and design.

Authors:  Xin Gao; Albert Hofman; Yu Hu; Huandong Lin; Chouwen Zhu; Johannes Jeekel; Xuejuan Jin; Jiyao Wang; Jian Gao; Yiqing Yin; Naiqing Zhao
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 8.082

2.  Precision of total and regional body fat estimates from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometer measurements.

Authors:  L A Kaminsky; C Ozemek; K L Williams; W Byun
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 4.075

3.  Effect of weight loss on bone health in overweight/obese postmenopausal breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Adetunji T Toriola; Jingxia Liu; Patricia A Ganz; Graham A Colditz; Lin Yang; Sonya Izadi; Michael J Naughton; Anna L Schwartz; Kathleen Y Wolin
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Weight loss and distal forearm fractures in postmenopausal women: the Nord-Trøndelag health study, Norway.

Authors:  T K Omsland; B Schei; A B Grønskag; A Langhammer; L Forsén; C G Gjesdal; H E Meyer
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-03-07       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  New studies, technology, and the progress of epidemiology.

Authors:  Albert Hofman
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 8.082

6.  The Generation R Study: design and cohort update 2010.

Authors:  Vincent W V Jaddoe; Cock M van Duijn; Albert J van der Heijden; Johan P Mackenbach; Henriëtte A Moll; Eric A P Steegers; Henning Tiemeier; Andre G Uitterlinden; Frank C Verhulst; Albert Hofman
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 8.082

7.  The Rotterdam Study: 2012 objectives and design update.

Authors:  Albert Hofman; Cornelia M van Duijn; Oscar H Franco; M Arfan Ikram; Harry L A Janssen; Caroline C W Klaver; Ernst J Kuipers; Tamar E C Nijsten; Bruno H Ch Stricker; Henning Tiemeier; André G Uitterlinden; Meike W Vernooij; Jacqueline C M Witteman
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 8.082

8.  Bone mineral density and risk of cardiovascular disease in men and women: the HUNT study.

Authors:  Laxmi Bhatta; Aivaras Cepelis; Sigrid A Vikjord; Vegard Malmo; Lars E Laugsand; Håvard Dalen; Arnulf Langhammer; Imre Janszky; Linn B Strand; Ben M Brumpton
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 8.082

9.  The Rotterdam Study: 2010 objectives and design update.

Authors:  Albert Hofman; Monique M B Breteler; Cornelia M van Duijn; Harry L A Janssen; Gabriel P Krestin; Ernst J Kuipers; Bruno H Ch Stricker; Henning Tiemeier; André G Uitterlinden; Johannes R Vingerling; Jacqueline C M Witteman
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 8.082

10.  A Digital Model to Simulate Effects of Bone Architecture Variations on Texture at Spatial Resolutions of CT, HR-pQCT, and μCT Scanners.

Authors:  T Lowitz; O Museyko; V Bousson; W A Kalender; J-D Laredo; K Engelke
Journal:  J Med Eng       Date:  2014-05-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.