Literature DB >> 16261280

The long-term predictive value of bone mineral density measurements for fracture risk is independent of the site of measurement and the age at diagnosis: results from the Prospective Epidemiological Risk Factors study.

Yu Z Bagger1, László B Tankó, Peter Alexandersen, Henrik B Hansen, Gerong Qin, Claus Christiansen.   

Abstract

Although the utility of bone mass measurements has been the subjects of extensive investigations, the number of studies comparing the predictive value of bone mass measurement at different skeletal sites in the same cohort with a large number of clinically verified endpoints is limited. Furthermore, scant information is available on how age at the time of diagnosis influence the risk of future fractures posed by low bone mineral density (BMD). We have followed 5,564 Danish postmenopausal women for a mean period of 7.3 years. Bone mineral content (BMC) at the forearm and BMD at the spine and hip were assessed at baseline. Vertebral fractures were assessed on digitalized images of lateral X-rays of the thoracic and lumbar spine, whereas non-vertebral fractures were self-reported. At follow-up, 17.6% of the women revealed an incidental vertebral fracture and 14.2% reported a new non-vertebral fracture. The absolute risk per 1,000 person-years of osteoporotic fracture increased significantly with decreasing bone mass at all three skeletal sites (P<0.001). Osteoporotic BMD (T-score < or =-2.5) had similar predictive values of fractures regardless of the skeletal site of measurement. Furthermore, the absolute risk of osteoporotic fractures increased significantly with increasing age at the same level of bone mass. Interestingly, the relative risk (RR) of vertebral fracture accompanying 1 SD decrease in spine BMD was similar across different age groups: <55 years (RR:2.1, 95% CI 1.3-3.3), 55-64 years (RR:2.3, 95%CI 1.7-3.2), 65-74 years (RR:2.0; 95%CI 1.5-2.6). Furthermore, women with any prior osteoporotic fracture had a 2.4-fold (95% CI 2.01-2.75, P<0.001) increased risk of a new vertebral fracture. Both age and prior fracture are strong predictors of future fractures. The long-term predictive value of bone mass measurement is independent of the site of measurement and the age at diagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16261280     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-005-0009-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  26 in total

1.  The relationship between bone density and incident vertebral fracture in men and women.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Guidelines for diagnosis and management of osteoporosis. The European Foundation for Osteoporosis and Bone Disease.

Authors:  J A Kanis; P Delmas; P Burckhardt; C Cooper; D Torgerson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  The diagnosis of osteoporosis.

Authors:  J A Kanis; L J Melton; C Christiansen; C C Johnston; N Khaltaev
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  A comparison of single and multi-site BMC measurements for assessment of spine fracture probability.

Authors:  R D Wasnich; P D Ross; J W Davis; J M Vogel
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 5.  Epidemiology of fractures and assessment of fracture risk.

Authors:  D M Black; C Cooper
Journal:  Clin Lab Med       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.935

6.  Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Authors:  S R Cummings; D M Black; M C Nevitt; W Browner; J Cauley; K Ensrud; H K Genant; L Palermo; J Scott; T M Vogt
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-01-09       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 7.  Diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk.

Authors:  John A Kanis
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Baseline measurement of bone mass predicts fracture in white women.

Authors:  S L Hui; C W Slemenda; C C Johnston
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1989-09-01       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  D Marshall; O Johnell; H Wedel
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-05-18

10.  Predicting various fragility fractures in women by forearm bone densitometry: a follow-up study.

Authors:  P Gärdsell; O Johnell; B E Nilsson; B Gullberg
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.333

View more
  24 in total

1.  Age-related trends in hip geometry in Sri Lankan women: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Sarath Lekamwasam; Janaka Lenora
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2007-10-25       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Corticosteroid use and bone mineral accretion in children with asthma: effect modification by vitamin D.

Authors:  Sze Man Tse; H William Kelly; Augusto A Litonjua; Mark L Van Natta; Scott T Weiss; Kelan G Tantisira
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 10.793

3.  Osteoporosis onset differences between rural and metropolitan populations: correlation to fracture type, severity, and treatment efficacy.

Authors:  Thomas Pagonis; Panagiotis Givissis; Athanasios Pagonis; Georgios Petsatodis; Anastasios Christodoulou
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Changes in bone mineral density may predict the risk of fracture differently in older adults according to fall history.

Authors:  Sarah D Berry; Robert R McLean; Marian T Hannan; L Adrienne Cupples; Douglas P Kiel
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2014-11-29       Impact factor: 5.562

Review 5.  Which fractures are most attributable to osteoporosis?

Authors:  Amy H Warriner; Nivedita M Patkar; Jeffrey R Curtis; Elizabeth Delzell; Lisa Gary; Meredith Kilgore; Ken Saag
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 6.437

6.  Vertebral fracture risk (VFR) score for fracture prediction in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  M Lillholm; A Ghosh; P C Pettersen; M de Bruijne; E B Dam; M A Karsdal; C Christiansen; H K Genant; M Nielsen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Prevalence of vertebral fracture in elderly men and women with osteopenia.

Authors:  Christian Muschitz; Janina Patsch; Elisabeth Buchinger; Elise Edlmayr; Günther Nirnberger; Vasilis Evdokimidis; Reinhart Waneck; Peter Pietschmann; Heinrich Resch
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.704

8.  The threshold force required for femoral impaction grafting in revision hip surgery.

Authors:  Olivia M Flannery; John R Britton; Peter O'Reilly; Nicholas Mahony; Patrick J Prendergast; Paddy J Kenny
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.717

9.  A computer-based measure of irregularity in vertebral alignment is a BMD-independent predictor of fracture risk in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  P C Pettersen; M de Bruijne; J Chen; Q He; C Christiansen; L B Tankó
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  From relative risk to absolute fracture risk calculation: the FRAX algorithm.

Authors:  Eugene V McCloskey; Helena Johansson; Anders Oden; John A Kanis
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.