Literature DB >> 8798003

Local staging of prostate carcinoma with endorectal coil MRI: correlation with whole-mount radical prostatectomy specimens.

C Bartolozzi1, I Menchi, R Lencioni, S Serni, A Lapini, G Barbanti, A Bozza, A Amorosi, A Manganelli, M Carini.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the accuracy of endorectal coil MRI in the local staging of prostate carcinoma. A total of 73 patients with biopsy-proven prostate carcinoma were examined at 0.5 T prior being submitted to radical prostatectomy. The gold standard was provided in all patients by findings at whole-mount sectioning of the surgical specimens. At pathology 28 patients had stage T2, 30 had stage T3a/b, and 15 had stage T3c lesions. Overall accuracy of endorectal coil MRI in defining local tumor stage was 82% (60 of 73 patients). Of 73 patients, 5 (7%) were underestimated and 8 (11%) overestimated. The sensitivity and the specificity of endorectal coil MRI in diagnosing capsular penetration were 95% and 82%, respectively. Seminal vesicle invasion was detected with 80% sensitivity and 93% specificity. Our data indicate that endorectal coil MRI is an accurate method for local staging of prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8798003     DOI: 10.1007/bf00180606

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  35 in total

1.  Morphologic analysis of surgical margins with positive findings in prostatectomy for adenocarcinoma of the prostate.

Authors:  G E Voges; J E McNeal; E A Redwine; F S Freiha; T A Stamey
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1992-01-15       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Prostatic disorders: MR imaging at 1.5 T.

Authors:  M E Phillips; H Y Kressel; C E Spritzer; P H Arger; A J Wein; D Marinelli; L Axel; W B Gefter; H M Pollack
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Hypoechoic lesions of the prostate: clinical relevance of tumor size, digital rectal examination, and prostate-specific antigen.

Authors:  F Lee; S Torp-Pedersen; P J Littrup; R D McLeary; T A McHugh; A P Smid; P J Stella; G S Borlaza
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Preoperative evaluation of localized prostatic carcinoma by transrectal ultrasonography.

Authors:  J E Pontes; S Eisenkraft; H Watanabe; H Ohe; M Saitoh; G P Murphy
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  The mechanisms and prognostic significance of seminal vesicle involvement by prostate cancer.

Authors:  M Ohori; P T Scardino; S L Lapin; C Seale-Hawkins; J Link; T M Wheeler
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 6.394

6.  Invasion of the neurovascular bundle by prostate cancer: evaluation with MR imaging.

Authors:  C M Tempany; A D Rahmouni; J I Epstein; P C Walsh; E A Zerhouni
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Patient survival and local recurrence rate following radical prostatectomy for prostatic carcinoma.

Authors:  R G Middleton; J A Smith; R B Melzer; P E Hamilton
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Prostate carcinoma: assessment of diagnostic criteria for capsular penetration on endorectal coil MR images.

Authors:  E K Outwater; R O Petersen; E S Siegelman; L G Gomella; C E Chernesky; D G Mitchell
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Preoperative assessment of prostatic carcinoma by computerized tomography. Weaknesses and new perspectives.

Authors:  C E Engeler; N F Wasserman; G Zhang
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Prostate cancer: local staging with endorectal surface coil MR imaging.

Authors:  M D Schnall; Y Imai; J Tomaszewski; H M Pollack; R E Lenkinski; H Y Kressel
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  15 in total

1.  Endorectal coil MR imaging findings in hemospermia.

Authors:  R Lencioni; S Ortori; D Cioni; G Morelli; E Ceretti; M Cosottini; I Menchi; C Bartolozzi
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 2.  Three-dimensional magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging of brain and prostate cancer.

Authors:  J Kurhanewicz; D B Vigneron; S J Nelson
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2000 Jan-Apr       Impact factor: 5.715

3.  Reproducibility of image interpretation in MRI of the prostate: application of the sextant framework by two different radiologists.

Authors:  Ullrich Mueller-Lisse; Ulrike Mueller-Lisse; Juergen Scheidler; Gerhardt Klein; Maximilian Reiser
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-04-20       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Optimal cost-effective staging evaluations in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Gregory L Lacy; Douglas W Soderdahl; Javier Hernandez
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Elastic registration of multimodal prostate MRI and histology via multiattribute combined mutual information.

Authors:  Jonathan Chappelow; B Nicolas Bloch; Neil Rofsky; Elizabeth Genega; Robert Lenkinski; William DeWolf; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Preoperative mp-MRI of the prostate provides little information about staging of prostate carcinoma in daily clinical practice.

Authors:  Andrea Billing; Alexander Buchner; Christian Stief; Alexander Roosen
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-11-29       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Seminal vesicle invasion in prostate cancer: evaluation by using multiparametric endorectal MR imaging.

Authors:  Fatma Nur Soylu; Yahui Peng; Yulei Jiang; Shiyang Wang; Christine Schmid-Tannwald; Ila Sethi; Scott Eggener; Tatjana Antic; Aytekin Oto
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Imaging in the diagnosis and management of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Samir S Taneja
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2004

Review 9.  Value of magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Friedrich Aigner; Leo Pallwein; Alexandre Pelzer; Georg Schaefer; Georg Bartsch; Dieter zur Nedden; Ferdinand Frauscher
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-06-14       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 10.  Role of magnetic resonance methods in the evaluation of prostate cancer: an Indian perspective.

Authors:  Naranamangalam R Jagannathan; Virendra Kumar; Rajeev Kumar; Sanjay Thulkar
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 2.310

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.