Literature DB >> 3894694

Preoperative evaluation of localized prostatic carcinoma by transrectal ultrasonography.

J E Pontes, S Eisenkraft, H Watanabe, H Ohe, M Saitoh, G P Murphy.   

Abstract

We evaluated 31 patients with clinically localized prostatic carcinoma by transrectal ultrasonography before radical prostatectomy. Results of ultrasonography were reviewed without previous knowledge of the extent of the disease and were compared to the pathological staging obtained by step section of the prostate. Preoperative transrectal ultrasonography was sensitive in detecting capsular and seminal vesicle involvement (89 and 100 per cent, respectively). However, the specificity of the method was low for capsular involvement (50 per cent), probably owing to the inability of this method to detect microscopic disease. This method is a valuable tool in the preoperative evaluation of patients with clinically localized prostatic carcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3894694     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)47127-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  7 in total

Review 1.  Periodic health examination, 1991 update: 3. Secondary prevention of prostate cancer. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination.

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1991-09-01       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Local staging of prostate carcinoma with endorectal coil MRI: correlation with whole-mount radical prostatectomy specimens.

Authors:  C Bartolozzi; I Menchi; R Lencioni; S Serni; A Lapini; G Barbanti; A Bozza; A Amorosi; A Manganelli; M Carini
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  The effectiveness of imaging modalities in clinical staging of localized prostatic carcinoma.

Authors:  T Tarcan; L Türkeri; T Biren; S Küllü; N Gürmen; A Akdaş
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 4.  Ultrasound findings are not useful for defining stage T1c prostate cancer.

Authors:  H Sanders; R el-Galley
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  Imaging of prostate cancer.

Authors:  P L Choyke
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  1995 Nov-Dec

Review 6.  Screening for carcinoma of the prostate: efficacy of available screening tests.

Authors:  I M Thompson; W R Fair
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1989 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 7.  Diagnosis of prostate cancer via nanotechnological approach.

Authors:  Benedict J Kang; Minhong Jeun; Gun Hyuk Jang; Sang Hoon Song; In Gab Jeong; Choung-Soo Kim; Peter C Searson; Kwan Hyi Lee
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2015-10-19
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.