Literature DB >> 17459267

Optimal cost-effective staging evaluations in prostate cancer.

Gregory L Lacy1, Douglas W Soderdahl, Javier Hernandez.   

Abstract

A new diagnosis of prostate cancer presents to both the patient and physician questions regarding the best approach for further assessing the extent of disease prior to selecting a treatment strategy. In addition to the initial clinical data such as serum prostate-specific antigen level, findings on digital rectal examination, and core biopsy Gleason score, several procedures and imaging modalities are available to further stage newly diagnosed prostate cancer. A substantial percentage of the cost of managing prostate cancer is directly related to staging evaluations. Often, staging evaluations are performed that have limited test performance characteristics, subject the patient to unnecessary morbidity, or simply do not provide additional useful clinical information. It is important that the physician be familiar with the indications for the available staging modalities as well as the test performance characteristics in order to proceed appropriately and in an economically judicious fashion. This paper reviews the literature on this topic and summarizes previous experiences with procedures and imaging modalities for staging newly diagnosed prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17459267     DOI: 10.1007/s11934-007-0005-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Urol Rep        ISSN: 1527-2737            Impact factor:   3.092


  58 in total

1.  The value of serum prostate specific antigen determinations before and after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  P H Lange; C J Ercole; D J Lightner; E E Fraley; R Vessella
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Which patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer need a computed tomography scan of the abdomen and pelvis? An analysis based on 588 patients.

Authors:  N Lee; J H Newhouse; C A Olsson; M C Benson; D P Petrylak; P B Schiff; E Bagiella; B Malyszko; R D Ennis
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Immunoscintigraphy with indium-111-capromab pendetide: evaluation before definitive therapy in patients with prostate cancer.

Authors:  M J Manyak; G H Hinkle; J O Olsen; R P Chiaccherini; A W Partin; S Piantadosi; J K Burgers; J H Texter; C E Neal; J A Libertino; G L Wright; R T Maguire
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Incidence of prostate cancer diagnosis in the eras before and after serum prostate-specific antigen testing.

Authors:  S J Jacobsen; S K Katusic; E J Bergstralh; J E Oesterling; D Ohrt; G G Klee; C G Chute; M M Lieber
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-11-08       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 5.  Prostate-specific antigen: a review of the validation of the most commonly used cancer biomarker.

Authors:  Javier Hernández; Ian M Thompson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Local staging of prostatic carcinoma: comparison of transrectal sonography and endorectal MR imaging.

Authors:  J C Presti; H Hricak; P A Narayan; K Shinohara; S White; P R Carroll
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  The accuracy of CT in the staging of carcinoma of the prostate.

Authors:  J F Platt; R L Bree; R E Schwab
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Prostate cancer: local staging with endorectal surface coil MR imaging.

Authors:  M D Schnall; Y Imai; J Tomaszewski; H M Pollack; R E Lenkinski; H Y Kressel
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Sextant prostate biopsies. A histopathologic correlation with radical prostatectomy specimens.

Authors:  P A Peller; D C Young; D P Marmaduke; W L Marsh; R A Badalament
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1995-01-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  The value of pretreatment clinical and biochemical parameters in staging and prognostic stratification of patients with newly diagnosed prostate carcinoma.

Authors:  M P Stokkel; A H Zwinderman; J Zwartendijk; E K Pauwels; B L Van Eck-Smit
Journal:  Int J Biol Markers       Date:  1998 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 3.248

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Advancements in MR imaging of the prostate: from diagnosis to interventions.

Authors:  David Bonekamp; Michael A Jacobs; Riham El-Khouli; Dan Stoianovici; Katarzyna J Macura
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.333

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.