Literature DB >> 25432525

Preoperative mp-MRI of the prostate provides little information about staging of prostate carcinoma in daily clinical practice.

Andrea Billing1, Alexander Buchner, Christian Stief, Alexander Roosen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the staging accuracy of preoperative multiparametric MRI (mp-MRI), its influence on the technique of radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP), and its value for daily clinical practice.
METHODS: A total of 106 patients underwent RRP (January 2011-June 2012) and had preoperative MRI staging data available for review. Staging results acquired by mp-MRI were correlated to both biopsy and histopathology results. Surgical reports were reviewed for intraoperative aspect of tumor extension, technique of RRP (nerve sparing or extended), and extent of lymphadenectomy.
RESULTS: The accuracy of diagnosing extracapsular extension (ECE) was 72.2 %, with an overall sensitivity and specificity of 30.0 and 93.3 %, respectively. The negative predictive value was 72.7 %. The sensitivity and specificity to diagnose positive seminal vesical invasion (SVI) were 63.6 and 92.9 %, respectively. Neither higher field force nor the use of an endorectal coil could enhance the accuracy of mp-MRI. In case of awareness of an existing MRI, there was a significantly higher percentage of nerve protection (left: 93 %; right: 89 % vs. left 75 %; right: 75 %). The higher percentage of nerve sparing surgery did not result in a higher level of positive resection margins.
CONCLUSIONS: In routine clinical practice, mp-MRI at non-academic centers has very limited clinical value in predicting ECE and SVI. Our data support the current recommendations against the widespread preoperative use of mp-MRI because it is not adding reliable predictive information on the extent of prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25432525     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-014-1448-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  26 in total

1.  Dynamic TurboFLASH subtraction technique for contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the prostate: correlation with histopathologic results.

Authors:  G J Jager; E T Ruijter; C A van de Kaa; J J de la Rosette; G O Oosterhof; J R Thornbury; S H Ruijs; J O Barentsz
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Consensus criteria for the use of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis and staging of prostate cancer: not ready for routine use.

Authors:  Axel Heidenreich
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Differentiation of noncancerous tissue and cancer lesions by apparent diffusion coefficient values in transition and peripheral zones of the prostate.

Authors:  Chiho Sato; Shinji Naganawa; Tatsuya Nakamura; Hisashi Kumada; Shunichi Miura; Osamu Takizawa; Takeo Ishigaki
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Transition zone prostate cancers: features, detection, localization, and staging at endorectal MR imaging.

Authors:  Oguz Akin; Evis Sala; Chaya S Moskowitz; Kentaro Kuroiwa; Nicole M Ishill; Darko Pucar; Peter T Scardino; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-03-28       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 5.  Imaging in prostate cancer diagnosis: present role and future perspectives.

Authors:  Francesco Pinto; Angelo Totaro; Alessandro Calarco; Emilio Sacco; Andrea Volpe; Marco Racioppi; Alessandro D'Addessi; Gaetano Gulino; PierFrancesco Bassi
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 2.089

6.  Diagnosis of prostate cancer in patients with an elevated prostate-specific antigen level: role of endorectal MRI and MR spectroscopic imaging.

Authors:  Nick G Costouros; Fergus V Coakley; Antonio C Westphalen; Aliya Qayyum; Benjamin M Yeh; Bonnie N Joe; John Kurhanewicz
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Radical retropubic prostatectomy with reduced morbidity: an anatomic approach.

Authors:  P C Walsh
Journal:  NCI Monogr       Date:  1988

8.  Local staging of prostatic carcinoma: comparison of transrectal sonography and endorectal MR imaging.

Authors:  J C Presti; H Hricak; P A Narayan; K Shinohara; S White; P R Carroll
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Prostate cancer: incremental value of endorectal MR imaging findings for prediction of extracapsular extension.

Authors:  Liang Wang; Michael Mullerad; Hui-Ni Chen; Steven C Eberhardt; Michael W Kattan; Peter T Scardino; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-05-27       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012.

Authors:  Jelle O Barentsz; Jonathan Richenberg; Richard Clements; Peter Choyke; Sadhna Verma; Geert Villeirs; Olivier Rouviere; Vibeke Logager; Jurgen J Fütterer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  10 in total

1.  Management of low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Henk van der Poel; Laurence Klotz; Christian G Stief
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Intraoperative frozen section monitoring during nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: evaluation of partial secondary resection of neurovascular bundles and its effect on oncologic and functional outcome.

Authors:  Georgios Hatzichristodoulou; Stefan Wagenpfeil; Gregor Weirich; Michael Autenrieth; Tobias Maurer; Mark Thalgott; Thomas Horn; Matthias Heck; Kathleen Herkommer; Jürgen E Gschwend; Hubert Kübler
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Accuracy of preoperative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prediction of unfavorable pathology in patients with localized prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Hakmin Lee; Chan Kyo Kim; Byung Kwan Park; Hyun Hwan Sung; Deok Hyun Han; Hwang Gyun Jeon; Byong Chang Jeong; Seong Il Seo; Seong Soo Jeon; Han Yong Choi; Hyun Moo Lee
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Validation of the current eligibility criteria for focal therapy in men with localized prostate cancer and the role of MRI.

Authors:  Raisa S Pompe; Bieke Kühn-Thomä; Yamini Nagaraj; Valia Veleva; Felix Preisser; Sami-Ramzi Leyh-Bannurah; Markus Graefen; Hartwig Huland; Derya Tilki; Georg Salomon
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Integration of MRI to clinical nomogram for predicting pathological stage before radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Cedric Lebacle; Françoise Roudot-Thoraval; Anissa Moktefi; Mohamed Bouanane; Alexandre De La Taille; Laurent Salomon
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  [Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer].

Authors:  Annika Herlemann; Christian G Stief
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 7.  Current role of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the management of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Nikolas Christopher Katelaris; Damien Michael Bolton; Mahesha Weerakoon; Liam Toner; Phillip Mark Katelaris; Nathan Lawrentschuk
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2015-04-06

8.  Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System in prostate cancer staging and planning for radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Mieszko Kozikowski; Bartłomiej Zagożdżon; Magdalena Gola; Jakub Dobruch
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 1.195

9.  External Validation and Comparison of Two Nomograms Predicting the Probability of Lymph Node Involvement in Patients subjected to Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy and Concomitant Lymph Node Dissection: A Single Tertiary Center Experience in the MRI-Era.

Authors:  Nicola Frego; Marco Paciotti; Nicolò Maria Buffi; Davide Maffei; Roberto Contieri; Pier Paolo Avolio; Vittorio Fasulo; Alessandro Uleri; Massimo Lazzeri; Rodolfo Hurle; Alberto Saita; Giorgio Ferruccio Guazzoni; Paolo Casale; Giovanni Lughezzani
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-02-25

Review 10.  Magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer: Comparative studies including radical prostatectomy specimens and template transperineal biopsy.

Authors:  Liam Toner; Mahesha Weerakoon; Damien M Bolton; Andrew Ryan; Nikolas Katelaris; Nathan Lawrentschuk
Journal:  Prostate Int       Date:  2015-10-19
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.