Literature DB >> 17569054

Value of magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer diagnosis.

Friedrich Aigner1, Leo Pallwein, Alexandre Pelzer, Georg Schaefer, Georg Bartsch, Dieter zur Nedden, Ferdinand Frauscher.   

Abstract

MRI has shown its potential in prostate cancer (PCa) imaging. MRI is able to demonstrate zonal anatomy with excellent contrast resolution. Furthermore it can detect PCa dependent not only on tumor-size, histological grading, PSA levels, but also on technical equipment and reader's experience. Non-palpable PCas in the inner and outer gland can be detected by this technique. Another potential is that MRI is helpful for tumor staging and treatment planning as well as response evaluation. Besides the morphological information, MRI can give functional information based on metabolic evaluation with proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy and of tumor angiogenesis based on dynamic contrast-material enhanced MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging. In addition MRI can be used for targeted prostate biopsies; however, the clinical practicability is questionable. Furthermore many data about the value of MRI for PCa diagnosis are based on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) biopsy findings. Since there is lack of accuracy in fusing MRI images with TRUS images these limit the results of MRI for cancer diagnosis. However, in the future MRI may play an additional role in planning and monitoring minimally invasive PCa therapies. Although, MRI of the prostate seems to be useful, nevertheless this method remains expensive and lacks availability regarding the oncoming requirements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17569054     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-007-0187-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  70 in total

1.  Extraprostatic spread of clinically localized prostate cancer: factors predictive of pT3 tumor and of positive endorectal MR imaging examination results.

Authors:  François Cornud; Thierry Flam; Laurent Chauveinc; Khaled Hamida; Yves Chrétien; Annick Vieillefond; Olivier Hélénon; Jean François Moreau
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Usefulness of diffusion-weighted MRI with echo-planar technique in the evaluation of cellularity in gliomas.

Authors:  T Sugahara; Y Korogi; M Kochi; I Ikushima; Y Shigematu; T Hirai; T Okuda; L Liang; Y Ge; Y Komohara; Y Ushio; M Takahashi
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Wash-in rate on the basis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: usefulness for prostate cancer detection and localization.

Authors:  Jeong Kon Kim; Seong Sook Hong; Young Jun Choi; Seong Ho Park; Hanjong Ahn; Choung-Soo Kim; Kyoung-Sik Cho
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Carcinoma of the prostate: prognostic evaluation of certain pathologic features in 208 radical prostatectomies. Examined by the step-section technique.

Authors:  D P Byar; F K Mostofi
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1972-07       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Prostate cancer: prediction of extracapsular extension with endorectal MR imaging and three-dimensional proton MR spectroscopic imaging.

Authors:  K K Yu; J Scheidler; H Hricak; D B Vigneron; C J Zaloudek; R G Males; S J Nelson; P R Carroll; J Kurhanewicz
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Are transition zone biopsies still necessary to improve prostate cancer detection? Results from the tyrol screening project.

Authors:  Alexandre E Pelzer; Jasmin Bektic; Andreas P Berger; Ethan J Halpern; Florian Koppelstätter; Andrea Klauser; Peter Rehder; Wolfgang Horninger; Georg Bartsch; Ferdinand Frauscher
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2005-08-10       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  MR-guided transgluteal biopsies with an open low-field system in patients with clinically suspected prostate cancer: technique and preliminary results.

Authors:  Stephan Zangos; Katrin Eichler; Kerstin Engelmann; Mukhtiar Ahmed; Sebastian Dettmer; Christopher Herzog; Wasilios Pegios; A Wetter; Thomas Lehnert; Martin G Mack; Thomas J Vogl
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-09-04       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Optimization of prostate biopsy strategy using computer based analysis.

Authors:  M E Chen; P Troncoso; D A Johnston; K Tang; R J Babaian
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Prostate cancer: detection of extracapsular extension by genitourinary and general body radiologists at MR imaging.

Authors:  Michael Mullerad; Hedvig Hricak; Liang Wang; Hui-Ni Chen; Michael W Kattan; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-05-27       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Comparison of sonoelastography guided biopsy with systematic biopsy: impact on prostate cancer detection.

Authors:  Leo Pallwein; Michael Mitterberger; Peter Struve; Wolfgang Horninger; Friedrich Aigner; Georg Bartsch; Johann Gradl; Matthias Schurich; Florian Pedross; Ferdinand Frauscher
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  4 in total

1.  Accuracy of preoperative endorectal MRI in predicting extracapsular extension and influence on neurovascular bundle sparing in radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Matthias C Roethke; Matthias P Lichy; Michaela Kniess; Matthias K Werner; Claus D Claussen; Arnulf Stenzl; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; David Schilling
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Multiparametric MRI-targeted TRUS prostate biopsies using visual registration.

Authors:  Philippe Puech; Adil Ouzzane; Vianney Gaillard; Nacim Betrouni; Benoit Renard; Arnauld Villers; Laurent Lemaitre
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 3.  Novel trends in transrectal ultrasound imaging of prostate gland carcinoma.

Authors:  Tomasz Szopiński; Andrzej Nowicki; František Záťura; Tomasz Gołąbek; Piotr Chłosta
Journal:  J Ultrason       Date:  2014-09-30

4.  Evaluation of the normal-to-diseased apparent diffusion coefficient ratio as an indicator of prostate cancer aggressiveness.

Authors:  Andrei Lebovici; Silviu A Sfrangeu; Diana Feier; Cosmin Caraiani; Ciprian Lucan; Mihai Suciu; Florin Elec; Gheorghita Iacob; Mircea Buruian
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 1.930

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.