Literature DB >> 33629210

Fractal analysis as a useful predictor for determining osseointegration of dental implant? A retrospective study.

Emrah Soylu1, Aykağan Coşgunarslan2, Selin Çelebi3, Damla Soydan2, Ahmet Emin Demirbaş1, Osman Demir4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The present study aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of fractal analysis on determining the osseointegration of dental implants.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a single center, retrospective clinical trial, patients with dental implants in the mandibular premolar/molar region, ASA I-II and < 65-year-old patients were included. Orthopantomograph (OPG) were taken before implant surgery (t0), within a week of surgery (t1), and 1 (t2) and 2 (t3) months after surgery, respectively. Three regions of interest (ROIs) from mesial, distal, and apical sites of the implants were chosen and fractal analysis (FA) was conducted with the box-counting algorithm using White and Rudolph's method.
RESULTS: A total of 39 patients 19 women and 20 men, with a mean age of 52.2 years (52.3 and 52.1 years, respectively) were included. The mean, minimum and maximum values of mesial (roi1), distal (roi2), and apical (roi3) surfaces were compared. The fractal dimension (FD) values of t1 were significantly lower compared with t0 as they decreased during the first week. FD values gradually increased after the first week although never exceeded the FD values of t0. Also, difference between mean FD values of t0 and t3 were found statistically significant (p < 0.05). DISCUSSION: FA is a promising and noninvasive method to predict osseointegration of a dental implant based on dental radiographs, and it can help shorten the total treatment time.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fractal analysis; Fractal dimension; Implant; Osseointegration

Year:  2021        PMID: 33629210      PMCID: PMC7904985          DOI: 10.1186/s40729-021-00296-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Implant Dent        ISSN: 2198-4034


  30 in total

1.  Fractal dimension from radiographs of peridental alveolar bone. A possible diagnostic indicator of osteoporosis.

Authors:  U E Ruttimann; R L Webber; J B Hazelrig
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol       Date:  1992-07

2.  Early loading of nonsubmerged titanium implants with a chemically modified sand-blasted and acid-etched surface: 6-month results of a prospective case series study in the posterior mandible focusing on peri-implant crestal bone changes and implant stability quotient (ISQ) values.

Authors:  Michael M Bornstein; Christopher N Hart; Sandro A Halbritter; Dean Morton; Daniel Buser
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2009-04-23       Impact factor: 3.932

3.  Immediate vs non-immediate loading post-extractive implants: a comparative study of implant stability quotient (ISQ).

Authors:  L Milillo; C Fiandaca; F Giannoulis; L Ottria; A Lucchese; F Silvestre; M Petruzzi
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2016-11-13

4.  Seven-year follow-up results of TiUnite implants supporting mandibular overdentures: early versus delayed loading.

Authors:  Ilser Turkyilmaz; Tolga F Tozum; Dana M Fuhrmann; Celal Tumer
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2011-07-11       Impact factor: 3.932

5.  Fractal dimension and architecture of trabecular bone.

Authors:  N L Fazzalari; I H Parkinson
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 7.996

6.  A dynamic modal testing technique for noninvasive assessment of bone-dental implant interfaces.

Authors:  J J Elias; J B Brunski; H A Scarton
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  1996 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  Consideration of various bone quality evaluation methods.

Authors:  Kyung-In Jeong; Su-Gwan Kim; Ji-Su Oh; Mi-Ae Jeong
Journal:  Implant Dent       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.454

Review 8.  Osseointegration and its experimental background.

Authors:  P I Brånemark
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 3.426

9.  The differences in panoramic mandibular indices and fractal dimension between patients with and without spinal osteoporosis.

Authors:  F Yaşar; F Akgünlü
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.419

10.  Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man.

Authors:  T Albrektsson; P I Brånemark; H A Hansson; J Lindström
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1981
View more
  6 in total

1.  Use of the Fractal Dimension to Differentiate Epithelium and Connective Tissue in Oral Leukoplakias.

Authors:  Yolanda Guerrero-Sánchez; Francisco Gómez García; Cintia M Chamorro-Petronacci; José M Suárez-Peñaranda; Mario Pérez-Sayáns
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 6.575

2.  Application of Fractal Analysis in Detecting Trabecular Bone Changes in Periapical Radiograph of Patients with Periodontitis.

Authors:  Parisa Soltani; Sajad Sami; Jaber Yaghini; Ehsan Golkar; Francesco Riccitiello; Gianrico Spagnuolo
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2021-10-07

3.  Evaluation of change in trabecular bone structure surrounding dental implants by fractal dimension analysis and comparison with radiomorphometric indicators: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Ilkim Karadag; Hasan Guney Yilmaz
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 4.  Fractal Dimension as a Tool for Assessment of Dental Implant Stability-A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Sukanya Mishra; Manoj Kumar; Lora Mishra; Rinkee Mohanty; Rashmita Nayak; Abhaya Chandra Das; Sambhab Mishra; Saurav Panda; Barbara Lapinska
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 4.964

5.  The effects of vitamin D deficiency on mandibular bone structure: a retrospective radiological study.

Authors:  Meltem Zihni Korkmaz; Hatice Yemenoğlu; Dilara Nil Günaçar; Gülbahar Ustaoğlu; Esra Ateş Yildirim
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 1.852

6.  Surface Evaluation of Orthodontic Brackets Using Texture and Fractal Dimension Analysis.

Authors:  Michał Sarul; Marcin Mikulewicz; Marcin Kozakiewicz; Kamil Jurczyszyn
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 3.623

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.