Literature DB >> 24802628

Fractal analysis for the assessment of trabecular peri-implant alveolar bone using panoramic radiographs.

Mert Zeytinoğlu1, Betül İlhan, Nesrin Dündar, Hayal Boyacioğlu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: There is no consensus on the relationship between fractal dimension and trabecular bone complexity. Our aims were to examine the changes in fractal dimension (FD) from peri-implant alveolar bone on digital panoramic radiographs 6 and 12 months after prosthodontic loading and to compare these with baseline values calculated just after loading.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three panoramic radiographs taken from 76 implant patients taken (1) after prosthodontic loading (3 months ± 2 weeks after insertion = baseline), (2) 6 months ± 2 weeks after loading, and (3) 12 months ±2 weeks after loading were considered for the study. Panoramic images were obtained using storage phosphor plates of the Digora PCT system and saved into a computer. Three regions of interest from mesial, distal, and apical areas were selected for each implant on three consecutive panoramic images. Statistical analysis of the data was performed using two-way repeated measures ANOVA, independent t test and paired t test, and pairwise comparisons (P < 0.05).
RESULTS: Mean FD values at baseline were 1.202, 1.224, and 1.199 for apical, mesial, and distal areas. The FD values were calculated as 1.121, 1.113, and 1.128 at the 6th month. The differences between values calculated at baseline and the 6th month were statistically significant for all aspects, indicating a significant decrease in FD 6 months after prosthodontic loading (P < 0.05). FD values calculated at the 12th month were 1.121, 1.110, and 1.121 for apical, mesial, and distal aspects, respectively, with no significant differences from corresponding values obtained at the 6th month (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: FD values of trabecular bone around implants 6 months after prosthodontic loading are significantly lower than the baseline values. However, no significant decrease or increase was observed at 12 months, which revealed comparable results with peri-implant alveolar bone at 6 months. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Trabecular bone around successful dental implants exhibits lower fractal dimension values 6 months after prosthodontic loading and displays stable bony microstructure at 12 months of follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24802628     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-014-1245-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  40 in total

1.  The trabecular structure of developing human mandible.

Authors:  A. Wojtowicz; S. Chaberek; A. Pirino; A. Montella; P. Bandiera; A. Kinsner; K. Ostrowski
Journal:  Clin Orthod Res       Date:  2001-08

2.  Fractal dimension and lacunarity analysis of dental radiographs.

Authors:  F Yasar; F Akgünlü
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Direct measurement of trabecular bone anisotropy using directional fractal dimension and principal axes of inertia.

Authors:  Won-Jin Yi; Min-Suk Heo; Sam-Sun Lee; Soon-Chul Choi; Kyung-Hoe Huh; Seung-Pyo Lee
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2007-03-26

4.  Damping factor for monitoring the bone interface at dental implants.

Authors:  Mario Veltri; Piero Balleri; Marco Ferrari
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2007-09-20       Impact factor: 5.977

5.  Analysis of texture in macroradiographs of osteoarthritic knees using the fractal signature.

Authors:  J A Lynch; D J Hawkes; J C Buckland-Wright
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Alveolar process fractal dimension and postcranial bone density.

Authors:  T E Southard; K A Southard; A Lee
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2001-04

7.  A new method for automatic recognition of the radiographic trabecular pattern.

Authors:  W G Geraets; P F Van der Stelt; C J Netelenbos; P J Elders
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Multifractal radiographic analysis of osteoporosis.

Authors:  P Caligiuri; M L Giger; M Favus
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  CBCT fractal dimension changes at the apex of immediate implants placed using undersized drilling.

Authors:  Oscar González-Martín; Ernesto A Lee; Mario Veltri
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 5.977

10.  The differences in panoramic mandibular indices and fractal dimension between patients with and without spinal osteoporosis.

Authors:  F Yaşar; F Akgünlü
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.419

View more
  16 in total

1.  Evaluation of trabecular pattern of mandible using fractal dimension, bone area fraction, and gray scale value: comparison of cone-beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography.

Authors:  Guldane Magat; Sevgi Ozcan Sener
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 1.852

2.  Computer-based automatic classification of trabecular bone pattern can assist radiographic bone quality assessment at dental implant site.

Authors:  Laura Ferreira Pinheiro Nicolielo; Jeroen Van Dessel; G Harry van Lenthe; Ivo Lambrichts; Reinhilde Jacobs
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Retrospective fractal analyses of one-year follow-up data obtained after single-visit nonsurgical endodontic retreatment on periapical radiographs.

Authors:  Samet Tosun; Emrah Karataslioglu; Mustafa Mert Tulgar; Gözde Derindag
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-07-24       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Evaluation of mandibular bone changes in multiple myeloma patients on dental panoramic radiographs.

Authors:  Rıdvan Akyol; Gamze Şirin Sarıbal; Mehmet Amuk
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 1.882

5.  Trabecular structure designation using fractal analysis technique on panoramic radiographs of patients with bisphosphonate intake: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Kemal Özgür Demiralp; Emine Şebnem Kurşun-Çakmak; Seval Bayrak; Nihat Akbulut; Cemal Atakan; Kaan Orhan
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 1.852

6.  Fractal properties of the trabecular pattern of the mandible in chronic renal failure.

Authors:  Ismail Gumussoy; Ozkan Miloglu; Erdem Cankaya; Ibrahim S Bayrakdar
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.419

7.  Use of fractal analysis in dental images: a systematic review.

Authors:  Camila Nao Kato; Sâmila G Barra; Núbia Pk Tavares; Tânia Mp Amaral; Cláudia B Brasileiro; Ricardo A Mesquita; Lucas G Abreu
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 2.419

8.  Fractal analysis of subchondral bone changes of the hand in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Shahin Zandieh; Joerg Haller; Reinhard Bernt; Klaus Hergan; Eva Rath
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.889

9.  A Comparison between the Implant Stability Quotient and the Fractal Dimension of Alveolar Bone at the Implant Site.

Authors:  Tomasz Kulczyk; Agata Czajka-Jakubowska; Agnieszka Przystańska
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Image-based Bone Density Classification Using Fractal Dimensions and Histological Analysis of Implant Recipient Site.

Authors:  Elie Hayek; Georges Aoun; Hassem Geha; Ibrahim Nasseh
Journal:  Acta Inform Med       Date:  2020-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.