Literature DB >> 8757495

Compound word effects differ in reading, on-line naming, and delayed naming tasks.

A W Inhoff1, D Briihl, J Schwartz.   

Abstract

Bimorphemic compound words (e.g., blueberry), bimorphemic suffixed words (e.g., ceaseless), and monomorphemic controls (e.g., arthritis) were read in neutral sentence contexts in Experiment 1. The main result revealed longer first fixation durations on compound words than on control and suffixed words. Different effects emerged when naming tasks were used. An on-line naming task revealed substantially shorter naming latencies for compound words than for control and suffixed words. Naming latencies for compound and control words were equivalent in a delayed naming task. These results indicate that on-line naming latencies and word-viewing durations may yield diverging results. They also suggest that activation of constituent words of compound words occurs independently from the specification of conventional word meanings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8757495     DOI: 10.3758/bf03200935

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  25 in total

1.  Priming effects that span an intervening unrelated word: implications for models of memory representation and retrieval.

Authors:  S Joordens; D Besner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Automatic processes in word perception: an analysis from illusory conjunctions.

Authors:  W Prinzmetal; H Hoffman; K Vest
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Lexical priming from partial-word previews.

Authors:  A W Inhoff; S Tousman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Lexical access during eye fixations in reading: effects of word-initial letter sequence.

Authors:  S D Lima; A W Inhoff
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: effects of word frequency.

Authors:  A W Inhoff; K Rayner
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-12

6.  Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity.

Authors:  K Rayner; S A Duffy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1986-05

7.  Eye guidance in reading: fixation locations within words.

Authors:  K Rayner
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.490

8.  Seeing morphemes: loss of visibility during the retinal stabilization of compound and pseudocompound words.

Authors:  A W Inhoff; R Topolski
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Morphological analysis of disrupted morphemes: evidence from Hebrew.

Authors:  L B Feldman; S Bentin
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1994-05

10.  Relations among regular and irregular morphologically related words in the lexicon as revealed by repetition priming.

Authors:  C A Fowler; S E Napps; L Feldman
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1985-05
View more
  6 in total

1.  The generation effect: dissociating enhanced item memory and disrupted order memory.

Authors:  Neil W Mulligan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-09

2.  The GO model: a reconsideration of the role of structural units in guiding and organizing text on line.

Authors:  Seth N Greenberg; Alice F Healy; Asher Koriat; Hamutal Kreiner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-06

Review 3.  Are long compound words identified serially via their constituents? Evidence from an eye-movement-contingent display change study.

Authors:  Jukka Hyönä; Raymond Bertram; Alexander Pollatsek
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-06

4.  Eye movements and the use of parafoveal word length information in reading.

Authors:  Barbara J Juhasz; Sarah J White; Simon P Liversedge; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Eye movements during the reading of compound words and the influence of lexeme meaning.

Authors:  Albrecht W Inhoff; Matthew S Starr; Matthew Solomon; Lars Placke
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-04

6.  An Investigation into the Processing of Lexicalized English Blend Words: Evidence from Lexical Decisions and Eye Movements During Reading.

Authors:  Barbara J Juhasz; Rebecca L Johnson; Jennifer Brewer
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2017-04
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.