Literature DB >> 27246520

An Investigation into the Processing of Lexicalized English Blend Words: Evidence from Lexical Decisions and Eye Movements During Reading.

Barbara J Juhasz1, Rebecca L Johnson2, Jennifer Brewer3.   

Abstract

New words enter the language through several word formation processes [see Simonini (Engl J 55:752-757, 1966)]. One such process, blending, occurs when two source words are combined to represent a new concept (e.g., SMOG, BRUNCH, BLOG, and INFOMERCIAL). While there have been examinations of the structure of blends [see Gries (Linguistics 42:639-667, 2004) and Lehrer (Am Speech 73:3-28, 1998)], relatively little attention has been given to how lexicalized blends are recognized and if this process differs from other types of words. In the present study, blend words were matched to non-blend control words on length, familiarity, and frequency. Two tasks were used to examine blend processing: lexical decision and sentence reading. The results demonstrated that blend words were processed differently than non-blend control words. However, the nature of the effect varied as a function of task demands. Blends were recognized slower than control words in the lexical decision task but received shorter fixation durations when embedded in sentences.

Keywords:  Blends; Eye movements; Lexical decision; Visual word recognition; Word formation processes

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27246520     DOI: 10.1007/s10936-016-9436-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res        ISSN: 0090-6905


  16 in total

1.  Lemmas and lexemes: the evidence from blends.

Authors:  A S Laubstein
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1999 Jun 1-15       Impact factor: 2.381

2.  The role of morphological constituents in reading Finnish compound words.

Authors:  A Pollatsek; J Hyönä; R Bertram
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  The processing and representation of Dutch and English compounds: peripheral morphological and central orthographic effects.

Authors:  Nivja H de Jong; Laurie B Feldman; Robert Schreuder; Matthew Pastizzo; R Harald Baayen
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2002 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.381

4.  Compound fracture: the role of semantic transparency and morphological headedness.

Authors:  Gary Libben; Martha Gibson; Yeo Bom Yoon; Dominiek Sandra
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  The effects of morphology on the processing of compound words: evidence from naming, lexical decisions and eye fixations.

Authors:  Barbara J Juhasz; Matthew S Starr; Albrecht W Inhoff; Lars Placke
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2003-05

6.  How strongly do word reading times and lexical decision times correlate? Combining data from eye movement corpora and megastudies.

Authors:  Victor Kuperman; Denis Drieghe; Emmanuel Keuleers; Marc Brysbaert
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 2.143

7.  Reading polymorphemic Dutch compounds: toward a multiple route model of lexical processing.

Authors:  Victor Kuperman; Robert Schreuder; Raymond Bertram; R Harald Baayen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Reading Finnish compound words: eye fixations are affected by component morphemes.

Authors:  J Hyönä; A Pollatsek
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Parafoveal processing during reading is reduced across a morphological boundary.

Authors:  Denis Drieghe; Alexander Pollatsek; Barbara J Juhasz; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-04-20

10.  The English Lexicon Project.

Authors:  David A Balota; Melvin J Yap; Michael J Cortese; Keith A Hutchison; Brett Kessler; Bjorn Loftis; James H Neely; Douglas L Nelson; Greg B Simpson; Rebecca Treiman
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2007-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.