Literature DB >> 8756965

Audiovisual links in endogenous covert spatial attention.

C Spence1, J Driver.   

Abstract

In 7 experiments we investigated cross-modal links for endogenous covert spatial orienting in hearing and vision. Participants judged the elevation (up vs. down) of auditory or visual targets regardless of their laterality or modality. When participants were informed that targets were more likely on 1 side, elevation judgments were faster on that side, even if the modality of the target was uncertain. When participants expected a target on a particular side in just 1 modality, corresponding shifts of covert attention also took place in the other modality, as evidenced by faster elevation judgments on that side. However, it was possible to "split" auditory and visual attention when targets in the 2 modalities were expected on constant but opposite sides throughout a block, although covert orienting effects were larger when targets were expected on the same side in both modalities. These results show that although endogenous covert attention does not operate exclusively within a supramodal system, there are strong spatial links between auditory and visual attention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8756965     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.22.4.1005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  58 in total

1.  Tactile dominance in speeded discrimination of textures.

Authors:  Steve Guest; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-04-05       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Space-independent modality-driven attentional capture in auditory, tactile and visual systems.

Authors:  Massimo Turatto; Giovanni Galfano; Bruce Bridgeman; Carlo Umiltà
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-12-05       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Principles of cross-modal competition: evidence from deficits of attention.

Authors:  Brenda Rapp; Sharma K Hendel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-03

4.  Unimodal and crossmodal effects of endogenous attention to visual and auditory motion.

Authors:  Anton L Beer; Brigitte Röder
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over frontal eye fields disrupts visually cued auditory attention.

Authors:  Daniel T Smith; Stephen R Jackson; Chris Rorden
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 8.955

6.  Interruption from irrelevant auditory and visual onsets even when attention is in a focused state.

Authors:  Rob H J van der Lubbe; Albert Postma
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-03-23       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  An object-centred reference frame for control of grasping: effects of grasping a distractor object on visuomotor control.

Authors:  Sandhiran Patchay; Patrick Haggard; Umberto Castiello
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-23       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Low-level integration of auditory and visual motion signals requires spatial co-localisation.

Authors:  Georg F Meyer; Sophie M Wuerger; Florian Röhrbein; Christoph Zetzsche
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-09-06       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Separate attentional resources for vision and audition.

Authors:  David Alais; Concetta Morrone; David Burr
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-06-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Control mechanisms mediating shifts of attention in auditory and visual space: a spatio-temporal ERP analysis.

Authors:  Jessica J Green; Wolfgang A Teder-Sälejärvi; John J McDonald
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-08-02       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.