Literature DB >> 15785951

Interruption from irrelevant auditory and visual onsets even when attention is in a focused state.

Rob H J van der Lubbe1, Albert Postma.   

Abstract

The common view on the interplay between exogenous and endogenous orienting holds that abrupt onsets are not capable of attracting attention when they occur outside the current focus of attention. Does this also apply to sudden irrelevant auditory onsets and when irrelevant visual onsets occur far in the periphery? In addition, does focused attention also reduce the alerting effect of auditory onsets, or vice versa, do highly alerting stimuli distort the attentional state? Crossmodal and unimodal variants of the Posner paradigm were examined in two experiments with targets and irrelevant onsets occurring at 28.3 and 19.3 degrees from fixation. Either centrally presented arrows indicated the forthcoming position of visual targets to be discriminated, or warning cues signaled the likely moment of target occurrence. The targets could be preceded by peripheral auditory or visual onsets that were to be ignored. Crossmodal and unimodal exogenous orienting effects of these irrelevant onsets were observed while participants focused at the relevant side. In addition, no evidence was found that the alerting effect of auditory onsets was dependent on focused attention. Our findings indicate that, at least under the current conditions, neither crossmodal nor unimodal orienting effects of peripheral events dissipate when attention is in a focused state.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15785951     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-2267-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  23 in total

1.  The dynamics of shifting visuospatial attention revealed by event-related potentials.

Authors:  A C Nobre; G N Sebestyen; C Miniussi
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Focused attention reduces the effect of lateral interference in multi-element arrays.

Authors:  R H Van der Lubbe; P J Keuss
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2001

3.  Neural substrates of perceptual enhancement by cross-modal spatial attention.

Authors:  John J McDonald; Wolfgang A Teder-Sälejärvi; Francesco Di Russo; Steven A Hillyard
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Top-down search strategies cannot override attentional capture.

Authors:  Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-02

5.  Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: time course of activation and resistance to interruption.

Authors:  H J Müller; P M Rabbitt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.

Authors:  G R Loftus; M E Masson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-12

7.  Central and peripheral precuing of forced-choice discrimination.

Authors:  M Cheal; D R Lyon
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1991-11

8.  Spatial maps of directed visual attention.

Authors:  H C Hughes; L D Zimba
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Interactions between exogenous auditory and visual spatial attention.

Authors:  M Schmitt; A Postma; E De Haan
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2000-02

10.  Cross-modal selective attention: on the difficulty of ignoring sounds at the locus of visual attention.

Authors:  C Spence; J Ranson; J Driver
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2000-02
View more
  13 in total

1.  Multisensory integration affects ERP components elicited by exogenous cues.

Authors:  Valerio Santangelo; Rob H J Van der Lubbe; Marta Olivetti Belardinelli; Albert Postma
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Spatial attention triggered by unimodal, crossmodal, and bimodal exogenous cues: a comparison of reflexive orienting mechanisms.

Authors:  Valerio Santangelo; Rob H J Van der Lubbe; Marta Olivetti Belardinelli; Albert Postma
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-02-18       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Competition between auditory and visual spatial cues during visual task performance.

Authors:  Thomas Koelewijn; Adelbert Bronkhorst; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Capturing spatial attention with multisensory cues.

Authors:  Valerio Santangelo; Cristy Ho; Charles Spence
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-04

5.  Dual-task conditions modulate the efficiency of selective attention mechanisms in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Elena K Festa; William C Heindel; Brian R Ott
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-07-17       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Interactions between voluntary and involuntary attention modulate the quality and temporal dynamics of visual processing.

Authors:  Michael A Grubb; Alex L White; David J Heeger; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-04

7.  Cue contrast modulates the effects of exogenous attention on appearance.

Authors:  Stuart Fuller; Yunsoo Park; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Interactions between endogenous and exogenous attention during vigilance.

Authors:  Katherine A MacLean; Stephen R Aichele; David A Bridwell; George R Mangun; Ewa Wojciulik; Clifford D Saron
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Same, but different: Binding effects in auditory, but not visual detection performance.

Authors:  Lars-Michael Schöpper; Christian Frings
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Endogenous orienting modulates the Simon effect: critical factors in experimental design.

Authors:  Elger L Abrahamse; Rob H J Van der Lubbe
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2007-03-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.