Literature DB >> 8751872

Genome scanning for linkage: an overview.

A S Whittemore1.   

Abstract

Several different methods for linkage analysis are shown to arise from a single likelihood function L for the observed allele-sharing data at multiple markers in a chromosomal region. These include classical parametric lod score methods, nonparametric or "model-free" affected pedigree-member (APM) methods, and the Gaussian process method. Setting the methods in the context of the likelihood function L clarifies their underlying assumptions. A test statistic derived from L, the efficient score statistic, is introduced. It is asymptotically equivalent to the lod score, but it can be easier to compute when the penetrances and frequencies of alleles of the trait gene are not known. APM test statistics and the Gaussian lod score are shown to be special cases of efficient score statistics. This unified framework facilitates exploration of a range of models for the effects of a putative trait-predisposing gene, and it facilitates sensitivity analyses to examine the consequences of model misspecification.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8751872      PMCID: PMC1914900     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.025


  17 in total

1.  Power of sib-pair and sib-trio linkage analysis with assortative mating and multiple disease loci.

Authors:  W M Sribney; M Swift
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Sib-pair linkage tests for disease susceptibility loci: common tests vs. the asymptotically most powerful test.

Authors:  D J Schaid; T G Nick
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.135

3.  The problem of ascertainment for linkage analysis.

Authors:  V J Vieland; S E Hodge
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  The affected-pedigree-member method of linkage analysis.

Authors:  D E Weeks; K Lange
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  A resolution of the ascertainment sampling problem. I. Theory.

Authors:  W J Ewens; N C Shute
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 1.570

6.  A comparison of sib-pair linkage tests for disease susceptibility loci.

Authors:  W C Blackwelder; R C Elston
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.135

7.  Gaussian models for genetic linkage analysis using complete high-resolution maps of identity by descent.

Authors:  E Feingold; P O Brown; D Siegmund
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Some developments on the affected-pedigree-member method of linkage analysis.

Authors:  P J Ward
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  The generalized sib pair IBD distribution: its use in the detection of linkage.

Authors:  B K Suarez; J Rice; T Reich
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 1.670

10.  Construction of multilocus genetic linkage maps in humans.

Authors:  E S Lander; P Green
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  22 in total

1.  Assessment of linkage disequilibrium by the decay of haplotype sharing, with application to fine-scale genetic mapping.

Authors:  M S McPeek; A Strahs
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Linkage analysis in the presence of errors IV: joint pseudomarker analysis of linkage and/or linkage disequilibrium on a mixture of pedigrees and singletons when the mode of inheritance cannot be accurately specified.

Authors:  H H Göring; J D Terwilliger
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-03-23       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  All LODs are not created equal.

Authors:  D R Nyholt
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-07-06       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  A statistical method for identification of polymorphisms that explain a linkage result.

Authors:  Lei Sun; Nancy J Cox; Mary Sara McPeek
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-01-08       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Inherent bias toward the null hypothesis in conventional multipoint nonparametric linkage analysis.

Authors:  Nicholas J Schork; Tiffany A Greenwood
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2004-01-19       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Ascertainment-adjusted maximum likelihood estimation for the additive genetic gamma frailty model.

Authors:  Wanlong Sun; Hongzhe Li
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.588

7.  Computer simulation is an undervalued tool for genetic analysis: a historical view and presentation of SHIMSHON--a Web-based genetic simulation package.

Authors:  David A Greenberg
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 0.444

Review 8.  Genomic similarity and kernel methods I: advancements by building on mathematical and statistical foundations.

Authors:  Daniel J Schaid
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2010-07-03       Impact factor: 0.444

9.  Weighting affected sib pairs by marker informativity.

Authors:  Daniel Franke; Andreas Ziegler
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2005-06-28       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  Genetic linkage analysis of a dichotomous trait incorporating a tightly linked quantitative trait in affected sib pairs.

Authors:  Jian Huang; Yanming Jiang
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-03-17       Impact factor: 11.025

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.