Literature DB >> 15986318

Weighting affected sib pairs by marker informativity.

Daniel Franke1, Andreas Ziegler.   

Abstract

For the analysis of affected sib pairs (ASPs), a variety of test statistics is applied in genomewide scans with microsatellite markers. Even in multipoint analyses, these statistics might not fully exploit the power of a given sample, because they do not account for incomplete informativity of an ASP. For meta-analyses of linkage and association studies, it has been shown recently that weighting by informativity increases statistical power. With this idea in mind, the first aim of this article was to introduce a new class of tests for ASPs that are based on the mean test. To take into account how much informativity an ASP contributes, we weighted families inversely proportional to their marker informativity. The weighting scheme is obtained by use of the de Finetti representation of the distribution of identity-by-descent values. We derive the limiting distribution of the weighted mean test and demonstrate the validity of the proposed test. We show that it can be much more powerful than the classical mean test in the case of low marker informativity. In the second part of the article, we propose a Monte Carlo simulation approach for evaluating significance among ASPs. We demonstrate the validity of the simulation approach for both the classical and the weighted mean test. Finally, we illustrate the use of the weighted mean test by reanalyzing two published data sets. In both applications, the maximum LOD score of the weighted mean test is 0.6 higher than that of the classical mean test.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15986318      PMCID: PMC1224526          DOI: 10.1086/432378

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.025


  34 in total

1.  On a randomization procedure in linkage analysis.

Authors:  H Zhao; K R Merikangas; K K Kidd
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Two-stage global search designs for linkage analysis II: including discordant relative pairs in the study.

Authors:  X Guo; R C Elston
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.135

3.  Mathematical assumptions versus biological reality: myths in affected sib pair linkage analysis.

Authors:  Robert C Elston; Danhong Song; Sudha K Iyengar
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2004-11-11       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Multipoint linkage analysis using affected relative pairs and partially informative markers.

Authors:  J Teng; D Siegmund
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Allele-sharing models: LOD scores and accurate linkage tests.

Authors:  A Kong; N J Cox
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Faster multipoint linkage analysis using Fourier transforms.

Authors:  L Kruglyak; E S Lander
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.479

7.  Simple, robust linkage tests for affected sibs.

Authors:  A S Whittemore; I P Tu
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  A faster and more general hidden Markov model algorithm for multipoint likelihood calculations.

Authors:  R M Idury; R C Elston
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  1997 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 0.444

9.  A search for type 1 diabetes susceptibility genes in families from the United Kingdom.

Authors:  C A Mein; L Esposito; M G Dunn; G C Johnson; A E Timms; J V Goy; A N Smith; L Sebag-Montefiore; M E Merriman; A J Wilson; L E Pritchard; F Cucca; A H Barnett; S C Bain; J A Todd
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  Haseman-Elston weighted by marker informativity.

Authors:  Daniel Franke; André Kleensang; Robert C Elston; Andreas Ziegler
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2005-12-30       Impact factor: 2.797

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.